Human Cloning Should Be Condemned Essay

614 words - 2 pages

Human Cloning Should be Condemned

 

On November 25, 2001, the news that a firm called Advanced Cell Technology had created human embryos by cloning added new urgency to Congress's and the nation's deliberations on this issue.

 

This past summer, by a 265-to-162 margin, the House of Representatives passed a carefully worded ban on human cloning (H.R. 2505) which President Bush has said he will sign into law. The leadership of the Senate nonetheless has refused to take action on this measure, or even to consider a temporary moratorium on human cloning research. Further delay will only encourage some researchers to take further irresponsible steps toward the laboratory manufacture and destruction of human life. Such inaction is morally irresponsible and could result in irreversible harm to our society.

 

Creating human life in the laboratory by cloning should be condemned because it reduces human beings to mere products of a manufacturing technique. When cloning is done to attempt a live birth, the child is produced and wanted not for his or her own sake, but because he or she will carry traits that someone else values and wants to replicate. When cloning is done to pursue medical research, the reduction of human life to a mere instrument is even more complete, for a new human being is created solely to be destroyed for his or her cells and tissues. Even if medical benefits could be derived from such destruction, it is never morally permissible to achieve good ends through evil actions.

 

Neither practice should be allowed in a society that claims to respect inherent human dignity. As a representative of the Holy See recently stated to a committee of the United Nations General Assembly: "The act of cloning... is actually a form of imposing dominion over another human being which denies the human...

Find Another Essay On Human Cloning Should be Condemned

Human Cloning Should be Permitted Essay

1435 words - 6 pages Human Cloning Should be Permitted What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed

Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned

1053 words - 4 pages Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned The issues concerning human reproductive cloning are shrouded in controversy, perhaps overshadowing the true advantages of cloning technology. Therapeutic cloning, which is often misunderstood as reproductive cloning, is less controversial than the latter as it does not involve the creating of an individual being. Instead, vital stem cells are extracted from human embryos, in order to generate

Human Cloning Should Not be Permitted

4387 words - 18 pages continuing cloning research and those who are staunchly opposed to it.  Meanwhile, despite public opinion, science trudges on behind closed doors working to clone the first human. This paper will first provide a thorough, but brief, introduction into the topic of cloning itself, including its history and its mechanisms; then, through a series of carefully thought out points, it will illustrate why human cloning should not be allowed to continue at

Should Human Reproductive Cloning Be Legal

1004 words - 5 pages , she should not be part of the child’s life. This sort of repeal of parenthood for the surrogate mother would be devastating. We would create a great amount of turmoil for this woman and we completely disregard that she has rights as well as a human being. I decided upon using Kant’s ethical theory, also known as Kantianism to discuss the topic of human reproductive cloning. This theory is applicable to the topic because it is based on doing

Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned

2939 words - 12 pages Proposition: Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned.The news of the successful cloning of an adult sheep, in which the sheeps DNA was inserted into an unfertilized sheep egg to produce a lamb with identical DNA, has generated an outpour of ethical concerns. These concerns are not about Dolly, the now famous sheep, nor even about the considerable impact cloning may have on the animal breeding industry, but rather about the possibility of cloning

Human Cloning Should Not Be Regulated

1084 words - 4 pages these breakthroughs in their sights, would be forced to take their experiments underground to avoid political repercussions.           The opposition insists on the regulation of cloning and is suggesting a permanent ban, arguing that cloning in any way is unethical.  Some take the position that scientists can not be trusted, ethically, to know when the experiments should stop, therefore, the scientific community would be unable to effectively

Human Cloning Should Be Banned (Negative)- Argumentative Speach

1763 words - 7 pages that there are still human and have the same rights as their siblings. Society has already accepted illegitimate son's, it will be a small matter of time after they start cloning people that society will indeed accept them as people aswell.The case that has indeed captured the hearts and mind of many sci-fi authors, what will happen if a powerful leader gets his hand on technology could bring down evil onto his country. Thing is that in our

Human Cloning - Is it right? Is it wrong? This essay debates human cloning from a Christian perspective. The final answer is no; human cloning should be banned

706 words - 3 pages . God created us with our own qualities. We aren't perfect. We shouldn't expect to be. We shouldn't try to correct how God has made us. If we do, we are saying that He who created the Universe and its complexity has made a mistake. That isn't possible.Scientists have high hopes about cloning and what it might bring. They are talking about setting back the biological clocks and even giving immortality. Regenerating human parts is one of these

Should reproductive cloning be allowed?

710 words - 3 pages destroys and dehumanizes the child, the clone, and all humans at large. Humans will now become careless about the value of their life and the life of another, due to the fact that they could “simply” be replaced by cloning. Most supporters of human cloning don’t honestly asses the great disadvantages that it holds. The many downfalls and moral impediments in the allowance of reproductive cloning of humans should be in the

Human Cloning Can Be Beneficial

2475 words - 10 pages the human body to be used for organ transplants.’ Before going into the advantages of human cloning, one should know what the process of cloning involves. Many of the people say that it is the creation of another identical individual, but this definition is not enough. There have been many experiments and proposed methods for cloning but only one of them has been successful so far. This technique is called “Nuclear Transfer” or “Nuclear

Should cloning be legalized? Arguments pro-cloning and anti-cloning

963 words - 4 pages are two basic types of cloning: The more widely known, reproductive cloning, and the more obscure therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning uses biotechnology to make a copy of a molecule, cell, tissue, plant, animal or perhaps someday a human. The idea that humans might someday be cloned moved further away from science fiction towards genuine scientific possibility on July 5th, 1996. On this day, the first cloned mammal, Dolly the sheep, was

Similar Essays

Should Human Cloning Be Pursued? Essay

1209 words - 5 pages continue so that it can be used to save lives improve the practice of medicine. Reproductive cloning on the other hand is unethical and should never be allowed. Measures need to be taken to control research on therapeutic cloning, and cloning in general, so that the creation of a human clone never happens. Works Cited Bush, George W. "President Bush’s Speech on Cloning." White House. 10 Apr. 2002. PBS. Web. 28 Feb. 2014.

Should Human Cloning Be Banned? Essay

783 words - 4 pages . Although some scientists and ethicists agree with human cloning, there are more evidence that human cloning yields negative results. Opponents of banned human cloning claim that human have the right to clone themselves. They insist that human cloning is problem of individual choice and individual choice should be guaranteed if individual choice do not damage to other people. (Kerry, 2006) Also, they claim that human have right to choose the

Should Human Cloning Be Banned? Essay

937 words - 4 pages Physicians and scientists joined the chorus of “Thou Shalt Not Clone Humans!”(Pence 1). Since the creation of Dolly, there has been a long debate about the correct practice of biotechnology and inspiring the expectable imaginations of the public (MacKinnon 3). In the end, we always come back to one specific debate. Should human cloning be banned? Cloning is immoral and we would see clones as products for our use or as “test tube babies”. The

Should Human Cloning Be Permitted? Essay

2064 words - 9 pages people oppose the practice of human cloning owing to different scientific, religious and ethical perspectives. People in favor of human cloning claim that it will not only facilitate biologists in medical field but it will also allow infertile couples to have children and let other people to bring back their loved ones. However, it should not be legalized because it is considered immoral and unethical in many religions; it diminishes the genetic