This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Human Cloning Should Not Be Regulated

1084 words - 4 pages

          For centuries, man has been genetically modifying everything from food to dogs by using a process called selective breeding.  This process takes the best of what you have and makes more of it, or mixes the best of one with the best of another to see what happens.  Even though this process is relatively refined, it is still subject to trial and error.  Today’s cloning technology allows scientists to identify the genetic quality that they want to reproduce and insert it directly into a plant or animal, effectively eliminating the trial and error phase of selective breeding.  Regulating cloning, or worse, banning it altogether, would limit the progress of scientific advancement significantly.  The potential benefits for society range from increasing the viability of crops to curing the world of genetic diseases.  If cloning were banned altogether, the scientific community, with these breakthroughs in their sights, would be forced to take their experiments underground to avoid political repercussions.
          The opposition insists on the regulation of cloning and is suggesting a permanent ban, arguing that cloning in any way is unethical.  Some take the position that scientists can not be trusted, ethically, to know when the experiments should stop, therefore, the scientific community would be unable to effectively regulate themselves.  There has yet to be an organization, that all agrees upon, to enforce regulations on the scientific community in regards to this issue.  Another fear of the opposition, is that government funding and/or funding from the private sector would determine which research would move forward according to its profitability factor, putting the wants and needs of society secondary to monetary gain.
          Without regulation scientists would be free to make advances in cloning research that would benefit society.  Since the discovery of DNA, scientific technologies have been moving forward to find ways to benefit society with its knowledge.  The techniques used by scientists in the field of genetic engineering are quickly becoming standard practice in modifying plants and animals for the greater good.  According to "Cloning plants" in Farm Industry News, 15 Feb. 1999, researchers at USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in Woodward, Oklahoma, along with Russian scientists, have patented a hybrid between corn and its distant relative, eastern gamagrass, which can naturally clone itself.  The successful development of this hybrid should lead to the development of hybrid corn lines that can reproduce themselves. Eventually, these advancements should lead to an increase in viable crops and the reduction of labor and processing costs in the farming industry.  Cloning plants is not limited to farming advancements.  Gene splicing and cross species genetic engineering are scientific tools that may be used one day to create a plant that can produce human insulin, and then, cloning could be used to mass produce...

Find Another Essay On Human Cloning Should Not Be Regulated

Human Cloning Should be Condemned Essay

614 words - 2 pages should be condemned because it reduces human beings to mere products of a manufacturing technique. When cloning is done to attempt a live birth, the child is produced and wanted not for his or her own sake, but because he or she will carry traits that someone else values and wants to replicate. When cloning is done to pursue medical research, the reduction of human life to a mere instrument is even more complete, for a new human being is created

Should Human Cloning Be Banned? Essay

937 words - 4 pages Physicians and scientists joined the chorus of “Thou Shalt Not Clone Humans!”(Pence 1). Since the creation of Dolly, there has been a long debate about the correct practice of biotechnology and inspiring the expectable imaginations of the public (MacKinnon 3). In the end, we always come back to one specific debate. Should human cloning be banned? Cloning is immoral and we would see clones as products for our use or as “test tube babies”. The

Should Human Cloning be Permitted?

2064 words - 9 pages people oppose the practice of human cloning owing to different scientific, religious and ethical perspectives. People in favor of human cloning claim that it will not only facilitate biologists in medical field but it will also allow infertile couples to have children and let other people to bring back their loved ones. However, it should not be legalized because it is considered immoral and unethical in many religions; it diminishes the genetic

Human Cloning Should be Permitted

1435 words - 6 pages Human Cloning Should be Permitted What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed

Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned

1053 words - 4 pages Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned The issues concerning human reproductive cloning are shrouded in controversy, perhaps overshadowing the true advantages of cloning technology. Therapeutic cloning, which is often misunderstood as reproductive cloning, is less controversial than the latter as it does not involve the creating of an individual being. Instead, vital stem cells are extracted from human embryos, in order to generate

Should Human Reproductive Cloning Be Legal

1004 words - 5 pages , she should not be part of the child’s life. This sort of repeal of parenthood for the surrogate mother would be devastating. We would create a great amount of turmoil for this woman and we completely disregard that she has rights as well as a human being. I decided upon using Kant’s ethical theory, also known as Kantianism to discuss the topic of human reproductive cloning. This theory is applicable to the topic because it is based on doing

Embryonic Stem Cells Should NOT Be Used for Cloning

1511 words - 6 pages the cloning of mice and other cloned animals. In fact, it has been hard to get good data on the life span of clones because most of them die at such an early age. The same side effects would be prevalent in human clones. For this reason, many do not and should not condone human cloning. Also, the mental effects on the clone themselves would be significant. The mere way in which the clone is brought into existence would have effects on how he

Human Cloning Should Be Banned (Negative)- Argumentative Speach

1763 words - 7 pages that I can see here is that clones are human, they are not some robot, or piece of machinery, unless you take out the 'human' factor.So you're wondering about the physiological effect on them. Well considering we haven't actually had the opportunity to talk to one I think this might be difficult to answer. Even still, once you're a clone that does not mean you're no longer human. Clones are just humans, which instead were created in a cold hard

Human Reproduction Should Not be Controlled

1577 words - 6 pages Human Reproduction Should Not be Controlled There are many ways that human reproduction can be controlled either for better or for worse. One of the ways of controlling human reproduction is with in vitro fertilisation (IVF), this is widely used across the country for various reasons, for example IVF can be used to help infertile couples, single women, gay couples and many others to have children. IVF is quite a

Human Torture Should Not Be Allowed

1555 words - 6 pages The world should not sit down and ignore the blatant violation of basic human rights. Without human rights the world would be in total chaos. Yet torture, the most maleficent violation of human rights, continues to be used as a means of interrogation. Even here, in the United States of America, officials look to torture to get the information they need out of foreign prisoners of war. Torture, even under the direst conditions, should never be

Human Torture Should Not be Continued

2662 words - 11 pages not stop being torture simply because it hides behind fancy phrases and elaborate regulations. The techniques that are involved when subjecting people to torture may have changed over the years but one thing has remained constant. Physically or emotionally inflicting harm on another human being should never be an option. Regardless of the reasons for torture, the fact remains that it is not entirely effective and the information obtained is

Similar Essays

Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned

2939 words - 12 pages Proposition: Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned.The news of the successful cloning of an adult sheep, in which the sheeps DNA was inserted into an unfertilized sheep egg to produce a lamb with identical DNA, has generated an outpour of ethical concerns. These concerns are not about Dolly, the now famous sheep, nor even about the considerable impact cloning may have on the animal breeding industry, but rather about the possibility of cloning

Human Cloning Should Not Be Permitted

4387 words - 18 pages continuing cloning research and those who are staunchly opposed to it.  Meanwhile, despite public opinion, science trudges on behind closed doors working to clone the first human. This paper will first provide a thorough, but brief, introduction into the topic of cloning itself, including its history and its mechanisms; then, through a series of carefully thought out points, it will illustrate why human cloning should not be allowed to continue at

Should Human Cloning Be Pursued? Essay

1209 words - 5 pages procedures and forced to live his/her life completely for the purpose of another. “Allowing cloning would be taking a significant step toward a society in which human beings are grown for spare body parts, and children are engineered to custom specifications; and that’s not acceptable” (Bush). Reproductive cloning could also be abused by people who want to create genetically superior children. Using reproductive cloning you could clone the world’s

Should Human Cloning Be Banned? Essay

783 words - 4 pages . Although some scientists and ethicists agree with human cloning, there are more evidence that human cloning yields negative results. Opponents of banned human cloning claim that human have the right to clone themselves. They insist that human cloning is problem of individual choice and individual choice should be guaranteed if individual choice do not damage to other people. (Kerry, 2006) Also, they claim that human have right to choose the