This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Human Nature As Viewed By Thomas Hobbes And David Hume

2046 words - 8 pages

Human Nature as Viewed by Thomas Hobbes and David Hume

Thomas Hobbes in Chapter 13 of Leviathan, and David Hume in Section 3 of An Enquiry Concerning the Princples of Morals, give views of human nature. Hobbes’ view captures survivalism as significant in our nature but cannot account for altruism. We cover Hobbes’ theory with a theory of Varied Levels of Survivalism, explaining a larger body of behavior with the foundation Hobbes gives. Hume gives a scenario which does not directly prove fruitful, but he does capture selfless behavior.

We will give Hobbes’ view of human nature as he describes it in Chapter 13 of Leviathan. We will then give an argument for placing a clarifying layer above the Hobbesian view in order to account for acts of altruism.

Hobbes views human nature as the war of each man against each man. For Hobbes, the essence of human nature can be found when we consider how man acts apart from any government or order. Hobbes describes the world as “a time of war, where every man is enemy to every man.” (Hobbes mp. 186) In such a world, there are “no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” (Hobbes mp. 186) Hobbes believes that laws are what regulate us from acting in the same way now. He evidences that our nature is this way by citing that we continue to lock our doors for fear of theft or harm. Hobbes gives a good argument which is in line with what we know of survivalism, and evidences his claim well. Hobbes claims that man is never happy in having company, unless that company is utterly dominated. He says, “men have no pleasure, (but on the contrary a great deal of grief) in keeping company, where there is no power able to over-awe them all.” (Hobbes mp. 185) Hobbes argues that we are constantly diffident of other men. In order to ensure survival, we must dominate our competitors. We have natural instincts to dominate other men, according to Hobbes, and this is part of what constitutes our human nature.

Hobbes views human nature as very mechanistic, requiring that our actions have direct benefit to us. One may argue against Hobbes that he does not provide explanation for why some people in our current society act altruistically. For example, many people have been known to risk life and limb to save another. Hobbes may respond that those people are foolish aberrations from survivalism. One could also respond that altruistic acts do benefit those who do them, either by bettering one’s reputation, or giving one mental satisfaction. This is not adequate enough to explain why one would donate organs upon death, when one’s reputation is no longer of any use to them. Take another example: while driving one sees an unknown stranger standing in the road and swerves out of the way into a tree. Regardless of the outcome, the driver risks her own life in an effort to...

Find Another Essay On Human Nature as Viewed by Thomas Hobbes and David Hume

A Treatise of Human Nature: David Hume´s Philosophy

932 words - 4 pages , convey to him these impressions; but proceed not so absurdly, as to endeavor to produce the impressions by exciting the ideas" (Pg. 9, Paragraph 8). This is reasonable, as none of us can truly envision a sour taste without first having experienced it via our sense of taste. The only possible contradiction to this that Hume can find is that of gradient colors. If presented with a progression of shades of blue, with one shade missing, it is not difficult for us to conjure the idea of this missing shade, even if we have never seen it before. Works Cited: Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. (1739).

The Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes: The State of Nature as an Exemplum

1648 words - 7 pages In the Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes's theory of the state of nature serves as an exemplum; an account that legitimizes and argues for the authority of the state, by providing the logic behind sovereignty. The theory illustrates the point that without government, man is in hell (an awful and evil state of nature), where peace, order and liberty are impossible. His purpose in writing the Leviathan, and in describing man's state of nature, should be

Thomas Hobbes' Laws of Nature

807 words - 3 pages Thomas Hobbes: What Is The Difference Between Obligations In foro interno and In foro externo, and When Do We Have Such Obligations? According to Thomas Hobbes, there are certain laws of nature which exist in the absence of an organized government. These laws are extremely cut throat, and place people in extremely dangerous situations where their lives are in danger. Government is the answer to this dangerous situation, but it is here that

Thomas Hobbes' State of Nature in Leviathan

1799 words - 7 pages is in the form of a government. The reason it is used in the singular is that his belief leads to a single sovereign ruler. Hobbes does not leave things here; his working towards a government is a methodical movement. Hobbes begins to define what man is like by defining laws and rights of nature. These portions can read like legalese as he is making some nuanced distinctions. The nuance between right and law is made clear on page 189 of

Thomas Hobbes' State of Nature in Leviathan

841 words - 3 pages According to the view Thomas Hobbes presents within the selected passaged in the Leviathan, we live in a narcissistic society where man’s condition is primarily driven by ego and where the achievement of personal goals is deemed paramount. Within the State of Nature that is, outside of civil society we have a right to all things ‘even to one another’s body’, and there would be no agreed authority to ensure the moral grounds of our decisions

Comparing Thomas Reid and David Hume on the topic of the mind-body problem

851 words - 3 pages Is there an "I", or a "self"? What exactly does this "self" refer to? These are questions raised by personal identity that many philosophers have attempted to answer. Most people would probably believe that they have a self, but there are people and philosophers that think differently. One such philosopher opposed to the idea of a self is David Hume. On the other side of the argument, Thomas Reid, another philosopher, believed that there is

Thomas Hobbes' First Three Laws of Nature and the Fool's Objection

1547 words - 6 pages Hobbes' First Three Laws of Nature and the Fool's Objection Thomas Hobbes begins The Leviathan by establishing the idea that all men are created equal, although every man perceives himself as smarter than the next. As Hobbes says: "[men] will hardly believe there are many so wise as themselves; for they see their own wit at hand, and other men's at a distance" (25). He then argues for psychological egoism, describing mankind as driven by

In this discussion we will look at the meaning and nature of the social contract as seen from the point of view of political theorists, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke

2024 words - 8 pages questions are addressed by both Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan, and by John Locke in Two Treatises of Government. Both Hobbes and Locke wrote of that period prior to the formation of societies, referred to as the State of Nature, when individuality, rather than collectivity, described mankind. Each also wrote of how mankind was able to leave the State of Nature and form civil societies. This transition from the State of Nature to government was

Discuss: Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, BK III, Part 1, section 1

2558 words - 10 pages ', rather than a universal one. As such, it would be fair to suggest that in this passage Hume has no regard for such philosophical concepts as Absolute Good. From this it can be concluded that, since the individual is responsible for classifying an act of character rather than some innate idea of good and evil, this is a form of moral subjectivism.While this is seemingly apparent it remains to be seen if this is a reoccurring theme in Hume's work, or

An Examination of Thomas Hobbes' Moral Philosophy with an Emphasis on the Escape from the State of Nature

996 words - 4 pages focused central purpose throughout. He seeks to caution society of the inherent horrors of the "State of Nature" , a state which he sees as one of "continuall feare, and danger of violent death". Thankfully, Hobbes further strives to instruct mankind in how to avoid and escape this state.This negative perception of man's natural state stems from Hobbes' opinion that human beings are not naturally "good". In fact, Hobbes went so far as to say that

analysis Thomas Hobbes?s claim ?a state of nature is, or would be, a state of war of everyone against everyone.?

1422 words - 6 pages ;   Having explained the reason behind Thomas Hobbes’s argument we can much accurately analyze his claim. Over all Thomas Hobbes has made a well put argument. His argument that human behavior is driven by desires is a realistic look to human nature. Simply by looking at today’s world it is possible to see the consumption being made by human beings. As Thomas Hobbes says there is no complete satisfaction us humans. As soon as human

Similar Essays

Morality. Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes And David Hume Were All After The Truth

608 words - 2 pages Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are well known philosophers of the time. These three men were after the truth. The truth about life. The truth about how one exists. The truth about the world around them. They questioned, thought, and reasoned. This is what they did. There goal was to arrive at true and certain knowledge.Descartes and Hobbes were both rationalists. They did not trust their senses. Senses deceive and cover up the

Morality. Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes And David Hume Were All After The Truth

565 words - 2 pages COMPARACIÓN ENTRE RENÉ DESCARTES Y DAVID HUME. - Por un lado, Descartes es un autor perteneciente a la Modernidad (S. XVII), mientras que Hume es un ilustrado (S. XVIII) y fue contemporáneo de Rousseau. - Por otro, Descartes era racionalista (como Spinoza y Leibniz). Es decir, para él, el origen de todo conocimiento se debía la razón y las ideas innatas que ésta contiene. Sin embargo, Hume fue

Comparison Of Thomas Hobbes And John Locke: Human Nature

1546 words - 6 pages Amidst the bloodshed of the English Civil War, Thomas Hobbes realizes the chaotic state of humanity, which gravitates towards the greatest evil. Hobbes’ underlying premises of human nature–equality, egotism, and competition–result in a universal war among men in their natural state. In order to escape anarchy, Hobbes employs an absolute sovereignty. The people willingly enter a social contract with one another, relinquishing their rights to the

State Of Nature And Freedom: Leviathan By Thomas Hobbes

1793 words - 8 pages State of Nature and Freedom In the Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes places limits on the freedom of individuals in the social contract, as well as individuals in the state of nature. Hobbes writes that in the state nature, “the liberty each man hath to use his own power as he will himself for the preservation of his own nature; doing anything which, in his own judgement and reason, he shall conceive to be the aptest means there unto” (ch. 14, ¶1). An