This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Human Reproductive Cloning Should Be Banned

1053 words - 4 pages

Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned

The issues concerning human reproductive cloning are shrouded in controversy, perhaps overshadowing the true advantages of cloning technology. Therapeutic cloning, which is often misunderstood as reproductive cloning, is less controversial than the latter as it does not involve the creating of an individual being. Instead, vital stem cells are extracted from human embryos, in order to generate tissues and organs for transplant.

The goal of this process is strictly to harvest stem cells, resulting in the creation of “cloned organs”, which can be used to treat heart disease, Alzheimer’s, and cancer.
However, because reproductive cloning involves the creation of a specific being with specific characteristics it is much more controversial, and has much more at stake than therapeutic cloning. There are definitely advantages of reproductive cloning: individuals with fertility problems would be able to produce biologically related children, and couples who risk passing genetic disease to offspring would be able to have healthy children. However, cloning technology is still primitive, and although several attempts have yielded successful clones, human reproductive cloning should be temporarily banned because it is highly inefficient, extremely dangerous, and ethically irresponsible.

Although many mammalian species have been successfully cloned, cloning procedures are still primitive, and thus, are prone to failure. Certain species, including humans, are more resistant to somatic cell nuclear transfer than others are, and therefore have a lower success rate. Scottish scientists at the Roslin Institute went through 276 nuclear transfer procedures in order to produce Dolly the Sheep in 1997. Dr. Michael Soules, director of reproductive endocrinology at the University of Washington, claims, “It's the height of medical stupidity and arrogance to think you could successfully clone a human being today. . . concerns can be addressed when reproductive cloning has been shown to be safe in animals, which it has not yet." (Paulson) The success rate by means of reproductive cloning remains pale in comparison to natural procreation, and thus does not justify cloning as a form of procreation for the time being. The current success rate for reproductive cloning stands at one or two viable offspring per 100 experiments, and until the success rate drastically increases, cloning humans would be potentially dangerous and unethical.

The dangers that arise from reproductive cloning are numerous, and are enough to validate the banning of human reproductive cloning altogether. During mammalian reproductive cloning, a large proportion of clones suffered from weakened immune systems, which greatly compromised the animal’s ability to fight off infection, disease, and other disorders. “Animal experiments in cloning all indicate that a cloned twin is at high risk of congenital defects, multiple health problems and perhaps...

Find Another Essay On Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned

Should reproductive cloning be allowed? Essay

710 words - 3 pages destroys and dehumanizes the child, the clone, and all humans at large. Humans will now become careless about the value of their life and the life of another, due to the fact that they could “simply” be replaced by cloning. Most supporters of human cloning don’t honestly asses the great disadvantages that it holds. The many downfalls and moral impediments in the allowance of reproductive cloning of humans should be in the

Human Cloning Should Be Banned (Negative)- Argumentative Speach

1763 words - 7 pages that there are still human and have the same rights as their siblings. Society has already accepted illegitimate son's, it will be a small matter of time after they start cloning people that society will indeed accept them as people aswell.The case that has indeed captured the hearts and mind of many sci-fi authors, what will happen if a powerful leader gets his hand on technology could bring down evil onto his country. Thing is that in our

Should Human Cloning Be Pursued?

1209 words - 5 pages cell divide into a blastocyst (“What Is Cloning?”). There are two main controversial types of cloning that come from SCNT which are reproductive and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning involves the creation of another life and should be banned. “In therapeutic cloning … there [is no] implantation into the uterus to create a child” (Murnaghan). It is used to create stem cells for medical use and can save lives. The medical possibilities of

Should Human Cloning be Permitted?

2064 words - 9 pages approximately ten to fifteen percent of couples of reproductive age throughout the developing world (“The Ethics of Human Cloning”). Infertility, in its worst cases, can bring some degree of shame or incompleteness for both the sexes and may also develop into psychological problems in some couples. Therefore, reproductive cloning should be practiced for curing the infertility of couples and satisfying their emotional and psychological need for

Human Cloning Should be Condemned

614 words - 2 pages Human Cloning Should be Condemned   On November 25, 2001, the news that a firm called Advanced Cell Technology had created human embryos by cloning added new urgency to Congress's and the nation's deliberations on this issue.   This past summer, by a 265-to-162 margin, the House of Representatives passed a carefully worded ban on human cloning (H.R. 2505) which President Bush has said he will sign into law. The leadership

Human Cloning Should be Permitted

1435 words - 6 pages Human Cloning Should be Permitted What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed

Human Cloning - Is it right? Is it wrong? This essay debates human cloning from a Christian perspective. The final answer is no; human cloning should be banned

706 words - 3 pages . God created us with our own qualities. We aren't perfect. We shouldn't expect to be. We shouldn't try to correct how God has made us. If we do, we are saying that He who created the Universe and its complexity has made a mistake. That isn't possible.Scientists have high hopes about cloning and what it might bring. They are talking about setting back the biological clocks and even giving immortality. Regenerating human parts is one of these

Reproductive Human Stem Cell Cloning

1353 words - 6 pages The argument on whether human cloning/stem cell research should be deemed acceptable still exists. Those that are in favor of artificial reproduction claim that the benefits of human cloning far outweigh the negatives. Those opposed of accepting stem cell research lift up the argument that it is unnatural and cruel. This particular procedure is a technological process that involves “copying” a human’s nuclear DNA, this type of cloning is known

Human Cloning Should Not be Permitted

4387 words - 18 pages continuing cloning research and those who are staunchly opposed to it.  Meanwhile, despite public opinion, science trudges on behind closed doors working to clone the first human. This paper will first provide a thorough, but brief, introduction into the topic of cloning itself, including its history and its mechanisms; then, through a series of carefully thought out points, it will illustrate why human cloning should not be allowed to continue at

Human Cloning Should Not Be Regulated

1084 words - 4 pages these breakthroughs in their sights, would be forced to take their experiments underground to avoid political repercussions.           The opposition insists on the regulation of cloning and is suggesting a permanent ban, arguing that cloning in any way is unethical.  Some take the position that scientists can not be trusted, ethically, to know when the experiments should stop, therefore, the scientific community would be unable to effectively

Through the Looking Glass: The Case for Human Reproductive Cloning

2137 words - 9 pages who are clones can even lead a more fulfilled life than their normal counterparts. Those who object human cloning do mainly so based upon assumptions of moral or ethical injustice that occur after the cloning itself has already taken place, not the cloning itself. The practice of human reproductive cloning should not be banned until it can be fully implemented and understood, for scientific progress should not be stopped before it has come to

Similar Essays

Should Human Cloning Be Banned? Essay

937 words - 4 pages definition of a clone is an individual grown from a single body cell of its parent and having the same gene as its parent (Berube 282). ? Human cloning should be banned whether it is reproductive cloning or therapeutic cloning According to the Economist, attempting to clone a human would certainly end in disaster. The clones would be at high risk for stillbirths or sudden deaths. In animal cloning, for example, every one hundred eggs are used

Should Human Cloning Be Banned? Essay

783 words - 4 pages . Although some scientists and ethicists agree with human cloning, there are more evidence that human cloning yields negative results. Opponents of banned human cloning claim that human have the right to clone themselves. They insist that human cloning is problem of individual choice and individual choice should be guaranteed if individual choice do not damage to other people. (Kerry, 2006) Also, they claim that human have right to choose the

Should Human Reproductive Cloning Be Legal

1004 words - 5 pages . By allowing scientists to have their way with reproductive cloning, we would be treating everyone involved, such as: surrogate mothers, donors of DNA, and the clones themselves, all as a tool. Everyone included would be subjugated to the scientists’ way. By going against both chief views of Kantianism, this first option is for all intents and purposes, null. The second option is that human cloning should not be permissible and should be banned

Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned

2939 words - 12 pages Proposition: Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned.The news of the successful cloning of an adult sheep, in which the sheeps DNA was inserted into an unfertilized sheep egg to produce a lamb with identical DNA, has generated an outpour of ethical concerns. These concerns are not about Dolly, the now famous sheep, nor even about the considerable impact cloning may have on the animal breeding industry, but rather about the possibility of cloning