This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Human Suffering In Inferno And King Lear

1911 words - 8 pages

Both Shakespeare’s King Lear and Dante’s Inferno explore the reasons for, and results of, human suffering. Each work postulates that human suffering comes as a result of choices that are made: A statement that is not only applicable to the characters in each of the works, but also to the readers. The Inferno and King Lear speak universal truths about the human condition: that suffering is inevitable and unavoidable. While both King Lear and the Inferno concentrate on admonitions and lamentations of human suffering, one of the key differences between the works is that Inferno conveys an aspect of hope that is not nearly as prevalent in King Lear.
Through Lear, Shakespeare expertly portrays the inevitability of human suffering. The “little nothings,” seemingly insignificant choices that Lear makes over the course of the play, inevitably evolve into unstoppable forces that change Lear’s life for the worse. He falls for Goneril’s and Regan’s flattery and his pride turns him away from Cordelia’s unembellished affection. He is constantly advised by Kent and the Fool to avoid such choices, but his stubborn hubris prevents him from seeing the wisdom hidden in the Fool’s words: “Prithee, tell him, so much the rent of his land comes to: he will not believe a fool” (Shakespeare 21). This leads to Lear’s eventual “unburdening,” as foreshadowed in Act I. This unburdening is exacerbated by his failure to recognize and learn from his initial mistakes until it is too late. Lear’s lack of recognition is, in part, explained by his belief in a predestined life controlled completely by the gods: “It is the stars, the stars above us govern our conditions” (Shakespeare 101). The elder characters in King Lear pin their various sufferings on the will of a higher being; The concept that it is by their own action that they suffer is foreign to them: “These late eclipses in the sun and moon portend no good to us” (Shakespeare 14). By not recognizing their own hands in the events taking place, Lear and Gloucester cause additional turmoil for themselves and those around them. Similarly, in Inferno, Capaneus is a man whose punishment comes as a result of his own defiance. Zeus struck down Capaneus for defying a prophecy stating that he would not conquer the city of Thebes. As a result of his arrogance, Capaneus’ anger becomes his own punishment:
“O Capaneus, since your blustering pride will not be stilled, you are made to suffer more: no torment other than your rage itself could punish your gnawing pride more perfectly” (Dante 198).
Capaneus remains defiant of the Gods, and is one of the only sinners to do so, even as he lies in hell with the other blasphemers: “What I once was, alive, I still am, dead!” (Dante 197). Both Lear and Capaneus show repeated instances of hubris and stubbornness throughout their respective stories, and both fail to see their own faults. Each was forewarned about the consequences of his actions, yet each traveled down the path that would bring...

Find Another Essay On Human Suffering in Inferno and King Lear

Action and Observation in Shakespeare's King Lear

2386 words - 10 pages , Penguin 1992, p. 390 8 Kiernan Ryan, 'King Lear: The Subversive Imagination' in New Casebooks: King Lear, ed. Kiernan Ryan, Macmillan 1993, p.80 9 A. C. Bradley, Shakespearian Tragedy, Macmillan 1908, p.55 10 W. H. Auden, The Dyer's Hand and Other Essays, Vintage New York 1989, p.201 11 Harold Bloom, Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, Fourth Estate 1999, p.481 12 William Blake, 'The Marriage of Heaven and Hell' (plate 3 lines 11-12) in The Complete Poems, Penguin 1977, p.181  

King Lear and Madness in the Renaissance

1628 words - 7 pages divine inspiration (Skultans 20), but by the eighteenth century madness was viewed as no more than degradation and shame. In testimony to this, the eighteenth century's favorite version of King Lear was a version rewritten by Nahum Tate to include a happy ending (Byrd 7-8). In this version Lear recovers from his illness, wins the battle and reigns again: by suffering madness Lear pays for his sins and is returned to health and prosperity. In

Reckless Love in King Lear and 1984

2397 words - 10 pages Do the relationships in ones life define the individual himself or even the fate of that individual or are the relationships a reflection of the individuals characteristics, personality and choices? In the literary masterpieces, King Lear and 1984, the character relationships are the essence of the stories themselves. In each of these pieces, both Winston, the protagonist of 1984, and the major characters in King Lear are put through a series of

Kingship in King Lear and King Henry IV, Part I

1736 words - 7 pages inform his audience that King Lear cannot learn to properly love his people because he cannot recognize love’s quality, which explains why he doesn’t appreciate the genuine nature of Cordelia’s love for him. The treatment of both kings in King Henry IV, Part I and King Lear as failures to their title provides enough proof to infer that Shakespeare supported the notion that kingship is vulnerable to the human condition and to the imperfection of

Values In King Lear

1293 words - 6 pages King Lear can be valued in different ways and for different reasons. The story of King Lear encompasses many different ideas and themes pertaining to the central and sub plots. Whilst there are many different ways of reading Shakespeare's King Lear there are three prevalent readings in which to observe the main idea's put across. These readings are a family reading, a nihilistic reading and a Christian reading. There are three main scenes

form in king lear

1244 words - 5 pages Artistic Form in King LearKing Lear has remained one of Shakespeare's best works, and one of the best tragedies of all time, since the beginning of the 17th century; however, some early critics believe that certain elements of the story do not satisfy the criteria for a proper tragedy. The two plot elements under speculation are the subplot and the catastrophic ending. The primary focus of the story is set on the elderly King Lear, whose pride

Humanity In King Lear

1088 words - 4 pages Humanity in King Lear The play King Lear was written in the early sixteen hundreds by William Shakespeare. Despite its age, King Lear is nevertheless a powerful tragedy, which uses many theatrical effects to portray the essence of what it means to be human. Since Lear's characteristics are authoritarian, arrogant and self-centred, Shakespeare displays to the audience what it is like to be human. Since Lear has these characteristics, he banishes

Justice in King Lear

1434 words - 6 pages from either a fatalistic ormoralistic point of view, depending on their beliefs about thepresence or absence of a higher power. The theme of justice inrelation to higher powers can be illustrated from the perspectiveof King Lear, Gloucester, and Edgar.When reading King Lear, it is helpful to understand theElizabethan 'Chain of Being' in which nature is viewed as order.Rosenblatt (1984) states that there was a belief in anestablished hierarchy

Blindness in King Lear

980 words - 4 pages Blindness is one of the main themes in King Lear and is a recurring trait that is by several characters in the play. Blindness is represented literally, with Gloucester, and figuratively, with King Lear, in the play. In King Lear, Lear himself undergoes several shocking and unpleasant experiences due to his own figurative blindness. These experiences include his daughters, Goneril and Regan, treating him with disrespect and being locked out in

Love in King Lear

1044 words - 5 pages often known to write about the many rewards and dangers of loves in his works, a great example of this can be seen in one of his most well-known plays called King Lear. King Lear is about an aging British king who divides his kingdom between two out of his three daughters based on their flattery, the kings early retirement causes tragic consequences for every character. Throughout the play almost all of the characters, including King Lear, suffers

Fate in "King Lear"

1223 words - 5 pages FateIn the play King Lear fate decides where each person will go, how they live and how they die. Each character in the play believes in god or a higher power that is responsible for the good and unfortunate events in their lives. Fate places situations on each of them and it is up to the characters to decide how they will play out the situation. Each character blames the gods for their ill fortunes and complicated lives. When one lives under

Similar Essays

Shakespeare's King Lear Suffering Of Cordelia In King Lear

1503 words - 6 pages The tragedy of Shakespeare’s King Lear is made far more tragic and painful by the presence and suffering of the king's youngest daughter, Cordelia. While our sympathy for the king is somewhat restrained by his brutal cruelty towards others, there is nothing to dampen our emotional response to Cordelia's suffering. Nothing, that is, at first glance. Harley Granville-Barker justifies her irreconcilable fate thus: "the tragic truth about life to

Analyzing Shakespeare´S Account Of Human Nature In King Lear In Comparison With Other Authors

1697 words - 7 pages portray that human nature is either entirely good or entirely evil. He seems to suggest, however, that it is not impossible for one to move from one end of the spectrum of human nature to the other, as multiple characters go through somewhat of a metamorphosis where their nature is changed. In this paper I analyze and present Shakespeare’s account of human nature in King Lear in comparison with other authors that we have read throughout our year

Shakespeare's King Lear Goneril And Cordelia In King Lear

952 words - 4 pages The Characters of Goneril and Cordelia in King Lear   Nothing makes a story like a good villain, or in this case, good villainess. They are the people we love to hate and yearn to watch burn. Goneril, of Shakespeare’s King Lear, is no exception. Her evils flamed from the very beginning of the play with her lack of sincerity in professing her love for her father: "Sir, I love you more than word can wield the matter; Dearer than

Comparing Lear And Gloucester In Shakespeare's King Lear

1928 words - 8 pages      In Shakespeare's classic tragedy, King Lear, there are several characters who do not see the reality of their situation. Two such characters are Lear and Gloucester. Both characters exhibit a blindness to the world around them. Lear does not see clearly the truth of his daughters mentions, while Gloucester is also blinded by Edmond's treachery. This failure to see reality leads to Lear's intellectual blindness, which is his insanity, and