Hume On Miracles Essay

1688 words - 7 pages

David Hume provided one of the most compelling arguments to debunk the notion of miraculous events which are so dear to the heart of Christians in particular. Throughout this paper, I will argue that belief in miracles is justified. In order to make this argument, I will first examine Hume’s view that belief in miracles is not warranted. Then I will consider an opposing view that belief in miracles is justifiable through God’s constant activity in the world around us. Finally, I will contradict Hume’s view by arguing he gives a false definition of a miracle and if we do assume Hume’s view, no new facts could ever be proven.Hume understands a miracle as being a specific act by God that breaks a law of nature which has been created by God. He argues that we should not believe miracles ever happen. They could, but it is always more reasonable or wise to believe of any particular alleged miracle that it did not happen. He suggests it is more probable that someone has made a mistake or has lied.Hume goes on to explain himself by saying, "A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence" (p. 116). The main evidence we have for any belief is our own experience, but we must be skeptical about this since it might not represent the whole truth. When we base our beliefs on other people's testimony about their experiences, we should be even more skeptical as one must keep in mind that not all witnesses are reliable.Hume considers the case when there is disagreement in our experience of the testimony presented to us. In this case, we should weigh the different sides against each other. The case of the laws of nature having no exceptions is backed by all the science we have studied and by human experience. Hume explains that if an exception has been presented at some time to one or more of these laws, then this exception is based on the testimony of a few people who lived ‘far away and long ago’ (p. 116). He declares it is obvious that smart people will always put their faith in modern science versus an exception presented long ago.Hume explains that not all stories of miracles can be true. There are stories claiming to prove almost every religion there ever has been, and they cannot all be true. He begs the question, why believe one set of stories rather than another? Choosing one religion over another would be an arbitrary decision. Hume says a wise person will instead believe none of them (p. 116). The Bible is not necessarily more reliable than any other religious book, and they cannot all be true since what they say is often quite incompatible.Therefore, Hume is able to make his case against miracles for two sole reasons. First of all, we must consider the probability of the event reported and the credibility of the reporter. Second of all, miracles, as violations of natural law, are less likely to occur than any set of natural events required to explain the known facts. However, with many religions considering miracles to...

Find Another Essay On Hume on Miracles

Hume’s Reasons for Rejecting Miracles Essay

1250 words - 5 pages that miracles have no rational background. Hume was an empiricist, in other words, he believed that all knowledge is based on evidence that we gain through our senses. He argues that if a miracle goes against a law of nature, then it represents a single piece of evidence that goes against all the rest. So, for example, if we let go of a heavy object, it falls to the ground. That observation, repeated many times

The Existence of Miracles Essay

1070 words - 4 pages The Existence of Miracles When bringing the existence of miracles into question it is necessary to firstly establish a definition of a miracle and exactly what purpose they serve. As with many issues, theologians are divided on an actual definition of what a miracle really is. Paul Tillich (1886-1965) claimed that: "A genuine miracle is first of all an event which is astonishing, unusual, Shaking without

What is a Miracle?

1001 words - 4 pages has been recorded that there have been cases when they have suddenly regained one hundred percent health straight after the visit. This is surely strong evidence for the existence of miracles. On the other hand, Hume has made several criticisms in his book, Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and the Principle of Morals. He believes that miracles are transgressions of the law of nature but says that we cannot be sure what a natural

David Hume's Argument Against Belief in the Existence of Miracles

2170 words - 9 pages David Hume was a British empiricist, meaning he believed all knowledge comes through the senses. He argued against the existence of innate ideas, stating that humans have knowledge only of things which they directly experience. These claims have a major impact on his argument against the existence of miracles, and in this essay I will explain and critically evaluate this argument. In his discussion 'Of Miracles' in Section X of An Enquiry

Thomas Hume's Views on Miracles

1432 words - 6 pages There are different types of miracles and they exist to those who have a reason to believe in them. Thomas Hume believes that miracles are not real. He says that there is a reasonable explanation behind all “miracles” and a logical way to explain them. Survivors of almost unimaginable circumstances on the contrary equate their very survival to some sort of phenomenon or miracle. On one hand there is a philosopher with rational knowledge on why


1353 words - 5 pages ) Something done by God which is usually done by the working, but without the operation of the principles of nature. However Newtonian physics cause a stumbling block for the violation of natural laws as according to Newton these are “laws which never shall be broken” therefore we arrive at the conclusion that according to Newton miracles do not happen. If it is a violation of natural law and Hume agrees. On the other hand it can

Miracles happening in today's world? It is all a matter of faith

1156 words - 5 pages Do you believe in miracles?Do miracles really exist these days? Yet once upon a time when Christ was here on earth they did. Living people experienced these phenomenon's it is all a matter of faith. A miracle is "a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity, or by the interposition of some invisible agent" (Hume, 123n). Theologians of the Old & New Testament religions consider only God-willed contravention of the

Negative Impact of God on the Minds of David Hume, Christopher Smart, and William Cowper

1679 words - 7 pages , and never can observe anything but the perception. When my perceptions are removed for any time, as by sound sleep, so long am I insensible of myself, and may truly be said not to exist. (Rossi 2645) Hume believes that existing is a state of mind, not necessarily a state of being. It is not until he is conscious of his perceptions that he believes he truly exists. Hume also wrote on the subject of miracles. Hume’s simple

Of Mircacles

805 words - 3 pages David Hume wrote An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding in 1748 and contained in this was an essay entitled “Of Miracles”. David Hume was a Scottish Philosopher that lived in the 18th century he was born on May 7th, 1711 and would die on August 25th, 1776. He was from a philosophical school known as Empiricism, which basically means that everything originates through sense experience. He believed that everything we know ultimately started

David Hume

1638 words - 7 pages is very deviant and twisted. A person cannot trust a person these days no matter what. Also I know Hume stresses that there must be proof for a miracle to even be considered being real, but isn't a miracle based on a person's faith? Miracles are only performed by one individual, God. He is the performer of all the so called miracles even if he is dead. I believe miracles are a very real thing and should be also in today's society.Hume's concepts

Miracles - Identify a philosopher and examine their understanding of the term miracle. Examine arguments that can be used to discredit belief in miracles. How is belief in miracles still strong?

2604 words - 10 pages of a matter of fact is based on past experiences and customs. Therefore, he had cause to believe that if something defies the laws of nature, meaning that it goes against past experience, then it is improbable. When considering the validity of an eyewitness testimony, Hume argued that it was more probable that the person was lying than that an actual miracle had taken place.Hume vehemently denied the existence of miracles systematically through

Similar Essays

David Hume On Miracles Essay

1326 words - 5 pages Hume’s empiricist ideology clearly informed his position on the topic of miracles. In the following, I will examine Hume’s take on empiricism. From this it will be possible to deduce how Hume’s empiricism played a prominent role in influencing his belief on miracles. First, what were the principles of Hume’s empiricism? Hume claims that everyone is born with a blank slate (tabula rasa). The tabula rasa receives impressions which are products of

David Hume: On Miracles Essay

1897 words - 8 pages In explaining Hume’s critique of the belief in miracles, we must first understand the definition of a miracle. The Webster Dictionary defines a miracle as: a supernatural event regarded as to define action, one of the acts worked by Christ which revealed his divinity an extremely remarkable achievement or event, an unexpected piece of luck. Therefore, a miracle is based on one’s perception of past experiences, what everyone sees. It is based

David Hume On The Existence Of Miracles

1866 words - 8 pages . These miracles or signs from God can help to show divine favour, and to support our moral beliefs and ideology, to let us know that we are on the path of righteousness for those who believe. But what then, constitutes a miracle? A miracle, according to Hume, is a violation of the laws of nature, something that cannot happen, but does. (Hume, 1777,E10.12) I believe that Hume believes that the the laws of nature, cannot ever be violated, for

Of Miracles By David Hume Essay

975 words - 4 pages the same force, though bore indirectly, to overthrow every other system.? If the miracles try to destroy a system, a religion, it destroys the credit of the miracles themselves, and the system in which they were established. Since most religions are based on miracles and try to destroy each other with contrary miracles and then we as humans have no reasoning on which miracle to believe in. Therefore what I think that Hume is trying to say is