Hunger And Nuclear War Essay

1173 words - 5 pages

Hunger, in addition to nuclear war, is complex issue which humanity is mostly concerned about in the world. One might claim that famine is the worst issue as there is no evidence if a nuclear war will occur, while the rate of starvation will rise higher and higher (Seebohm 1984, 3). Statistically, the total number of people suffering from hunger globally equals to approximately 1.02 billion (FAO 2009 quoted in Sui-Lin Nah and Chi-Fai Chau 2010, 544). Annually, famine and malnutrition, as major reasons, account for more than 50% of the mortality of children, which is around 6 million (FAO 2005 quoted in Sui-Lin Nah and Chi-Fai Chau 2010, 544). In the case of India, there are 1.2 billion inhabitants. A quarter of them are facing the problem of hunger seriously (Colin Clark 1972, 2019). As there is an accelerated growth and prosperity in India’s economy, the country is proposing possible ways of alleviating famine. One of India’s suggestions is the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the MGNREGA. Discussing advantages and limits of the program, this paper will demonstrate that India’s guarantee scheme can be considered a good solution for famine.
The government of India has suggested an approach called the MGNREGA for poverty reduction. This program was launched in September 2005 by the central government of India. The major focus of the scheme is that it provides 100 days of paid employment to every household from rural areas. The goal of the act is to increase earnings of the villagers. Adult members of households do a wide range of laborious work which does not require any specific skills. What is more, the program has covered sufficient amounts of slow-developing rural areas of India: 200 – in the first stage, 130 – in the second stage, the remaining part – in the third stage (Pulak Mishra, Bhagirath Behera and Narayan Chandra Nayak 2010, 458).
As the actual emphasis of the MGNREGA is a minimization of poverty, there should be a question as to how these two situations are linked. Poverty and hunger are concepts which are closely connected with each other. Precisely, if there is an existence of poverty, there is a high probability of hunger. N. C. Saxena (2002, 6) cites that “Hunger can thus be a cause as well as a result of poverty” which leads to claim that one of these concepts, for example, poverty should be eradicated in order to alleviate the consequences of hunger.
Although the national project was launched less than a decade ago, much has been written and discussed about it providing evidence of success during the guarantee scheme’s implementation. From the beginning of the program, around one-third of the people from rural areas of India were provided with work under the NREGS in 2009-2010. A noticeable fact is that in a survey taken in six states, almost 70% of the participants replied that the scheme was helpful for them in preventing hunger (Drèze and Khera 2009 quoted in Mark Curtis, Celso Marcatto and Swati...

Find Another Essay On Hunger and Nuclear War

Disarmament:Good or Bad? Essay

1233 words - 5 pages that no country needs to make any more. Nuclear weapons are not just a manly symobol they are a weapons of mass destruction and should be as secure as possible. With other countries that could go nuclear or want to go nuclear now is not the time to disarm. The first nuclear bomb was made in the 1940's which was called the Manhattan Project. They built this bomb in order to end World War 2. After the United States dropped this bomb on

Atomic Essay

726 words - 3 pages Atomic Essay "Are nuclear weapons necessary?" No they are not. Nuclear weapons are capable of destroying all life on this planet, and there will never be a situation where that is necessary. Three examples of why nuclear weapons are unnecessary are: the amount of funds spent on nuclear weapons is staggering and could be better spent, tension from the cold war is relaxing and with that nuclear weapons no longer serve any purpose, as

The Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

1524 words - 6 pages more states retain nuclear weapons, the threat of such weapons falling into the hands of terrorists becomes a reality for all the nations of the world. The danger that a country in possession of nuclear weapons could use it on an enemy country remains as long as nuclear weapons exist. Existing and emerging rivalries between states present the possibility of war, which could be carried out using such destructive nuclear weapons. As the world becomes

War: Nuclear Power

1292 words - 5 pages The Cold War was a time of great tension all over the world. From 1945 to 1989, the United States was the leader and nuclear power and was competing with the Soviet Union to create huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons. However, even though the Cold War ended, nuclear weapons are still a threat. Countries around the world strive to create nuclear power, and they do not promise to use it for peaceful purposes. Some examples of the struggles

Post Cold Wat Nuclear Deterrence

2227 words - 9 pages than burdensome reminders of the cold war (Destler 1). Nuclear weapons have lost their relevance since they are no longer needed to fend off communists and are now counterproductive to American policy as well as international policy (Destler 1). While deterrence is still vital, the presence of nuclear arms is no longer perceived as a necessity. Post-cold war deterrence has included preventive diplomacy (such as embargos), and military deterrence

Nuclear Weaponry

1260 words - 5 pages Dexter Gordon once said, “In nuclear war all men are cremated equal”. Since the era when the first bow and arrow was created, humanity has been treading on the fine path of incessant vehemence. There are a countless number of reasons why people participate in altercations, from petty issues such as who lost the keys to more momentous disagreements such as those of Civil Rights or rightful independence. Today in the 21st century, not only have

Nuclear Weapon Funding in US Defense Budget

2509 words - 10 pages the Senate approved defense funding totals (excluding war costs) that were very close to President Obama’s so-called “base budget” (non-war) request, regardless of the BCA cap” (Pat Towell, Amy Belasco). With the proposed cuts, some nuclear security experts now question whether Obama, who made nuclear security a pet issue during his time in the Senate and launched the biennial Nuclear Security Summit process, remains committed to the issue

Nuclear Power

848 words - 3 pages transferred to civil nuclear power projects after World War II. That is why the standard statement from government or nuclear industry representatives after a nuclear accident usually starts with the phrase "There is (or has been) no danger to the public".Instead of issuing warnings or taking precautions, nuclear power plant operators and civil and military authorities try to conceal the truth. In almost 50 years of nuclear operations, they have

Does the Non-State actor represent a new challenge to nuclear proliferation?

865 words - 3 pages proliferation.References:1. James D. Kiras, 2006, Special operations and strategy from World War II to the War on Terrorism, London, p4802. Jon Wolfsthal and Tom Collina ,2002, "Nuclear Terrorism and Warhead Control In Russia" Arms Control Today, Carnegie, P1423. Peter, Willetts 1996 The Conscience of the World: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations in the UN System, Brookings Institution Press, p426 PAGE 4

Nuclear Power: Is it necessary?

990 words - 4 pages fission bomb is usually used. A fusion reaction releases about four times more energy per unit mass than a fission reaction. The United States supervised the development of the atomic bomb under the code name Manhattan Project, during World War II. The first nuclear chain reaction occurred in December 1942, at the University of Chicago. Soon after the first bomb test, atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945

Nuclear Limitations and Disarmament

983 words - 4 pages nuclear bomb, then that country would be putting a strain on the trust between the two ruling nuclear superpowers. One superpower will strongly disapproves, while the other power would choose the new nuclear country as another member of their “team”. Then the trust of cease fire comes into play, because the new nuclear country might decide to attack, and if given new weapons or more powerful ones, then that could lead into world wide war. The

Similar Essays

Christianity And Acceptance Of Conventional And Nuclear War

840 words - 3 pages Christianity and Acceptance of Conventional and Nuclear War Conventional war and nuclear war are different from others, but some Christians believe that both can take place while other Christians find nuclear war unacceptable but Conventional war is, I will explore this in detail. Some Christians think Conventional and nuclear war is acceptable because they are similar to each other in certain ways, although

The Unparalleled Effect Of Nuclear Technologies And Politics On The Outcome Of The Cold War

1349 words - 5 pages Of all the contending issues that fed the flames of the conflict that made up the core of the Cold War, none of them affected the outcome so much as the development and testing of nuclear arms and the politics surrounding their handling. After the long years of fighting during World War II, many of the old world powers were greatly weakened. The United States’ detonation of Little Boy and Fat Man over Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively

Have You Ever Thought About Nuclear War And How It Affects Your Everyday Life?

1360 words - 5 pages Nuclear War Have you ever thought about nuclear war and how it affects your everyday life? In a madder of minutes large parts of are country can be taken out by nuclear bombs. Nuclear consists of many different types of nuclear artillery and, many types of planes and submarines. Also it consists of many effects, accidents, and a history of attacks. These aspects of nuclear war range far from any other type of war.First, are the types of

Nuclear Deterrence Is The Best Defense Against Nuclear War

1240 words - 5 pages Nuclear Deterrence is the Best Defense Against Nuclear War In 1945, a great technological innovation was dropped over Japan, the atomic bomb. Ever since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world has faced the threat of nuclear attack. In reaction to this, world governments have been forced to find a defense against nuclear attack. One solution to the danger of nuclear attack is the use of nuclear deterrence. Nuclear deterrence is