This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Immanuel Kant's Theory Essay

769 words - 3 pages

Immanuel Kant's Theory

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) discussed many ethical systems and reasoning’s some were based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. In Kant’s eyes, reason is directly correlated with morals and ideals. Actions of any sort, he believed, must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason, and no action performed for appropriateness or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. A moral act is an act done for the "right" reasons. Kant would argue that to make a promise for the wrong reason is not moral you might as well not make the promise. You must follow a certain code in order to find truth behind your actions. Kant believed that you should treat everyone with value, dignity, and respect.
Our reasoning ability will always allow us to know what our duty is. Kant described two types of common commands given by reason: the hypothetical imperative, which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end; and the categorical imperative, which dictates a course of action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant in these words: "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will and general natural law." Therefore, before proceeding to act, we must decide what rule we need to follow if we were to act, whether we are willing for that rule to be followed by everyone all over. Kant believes that moral rules have no exceptions. It is wrong to kill in all situations, even those of self-defense. This belief comes from the Universal Law theory. Since we would never want murder to become a universal law, then it has to be not moral at all. Kant believes killing could never be universal, therefore it is wrong in each and every situation. There are never any extenuating circumstances, such as self-defense. I believe Kant is right in making certain moral and ethical codes exempt from being a universal law because there shouldn’t be different rules for different laws. The rules and laws should apply to every situation.
An act is either wrong or right, based on his universality law. For example, giving money to a...

Find Another Essay On Immanuel Kant's Theory

Comparsion Of John Stewary Mill And Emanuel Kants Philosophies On Morality

2288 words - 10 pages a better understanding to them and their theories individually.Mill holds an empiricist theory while Kant holds a rationalist theory. Kant grounds morality in forms that he believes, are necessary to free and rational practical judgment. Mill's utilitarian theory is a form of consequentialism because the rightness or wrongness of an act is determined by the consequences. Kant's ethics of pure duty is the basis for his categorical imperative

Immanuel Kant: A Philosopher Who Influenced Society

1018 words - 4 pages come into conflict since performing one’s duty does not necessarily make someone or others happy. The characters' actions are typical of Immanuel Kant's philosophy of the categorical imperious: actions are essentially good and do not find justification in their effects, or does one expect recompense for his actions. The conclusions of Immanuel Kant and G. E. Moore respect what they saw as the proper foundation for moral systems seems to have been at

Enlightenment

712 words - 3 pages Enlightenment Do we at present live in enlightened age? What is enlightenment? Immanuel Kant attempts to clarify the meaning of enlightenment while composing the essay, "What is Enlightenment?". The goal of Kant's essay was to discuss what the nature of enlightenment was. It also taught one how enlightenment can be brought about in the general public. Kant explains that, "enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred

An Examination of Deontology and Utilitarianism in Deeply Moral Situations

1305 words - 5 pages given situation, without any rational deliberation. As a result, a paradox arises, as the woman will not be acting from duty if her decision is influenced by inclination; yet, Kant's theory fails to acknowledge that her ability to reason adequately is hindered by her inevitable emotional response to the deeply moral situation. Alternatively, for a utilitarian, the chosen course of action should be the one that elicits the greatest

The Nature of Existence and the Existence of Nature

1863 words - 8 pages further the truth and subsequently progress in our eternal quest for knowledge. Works Cited Rohlf, Michael. "Immanuel Kant." Stanford University. Stanford University, 20 May 2010. Web. Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?”. The Longman Anthology Of World Literature Vol D 2nd Edition. April Alliston. Pearson, 2009. 599-604. Print Unknown Author “Immanuel Kant.” Encyclopedia of World Biography. Detroit: Gale, 1988. Web. Burnham, Douglas. "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." Kant, Immanuel: Aesthetics . IEP, n.d. Web. Emecz, Paul. "Ethical Theory." Kant's Ethical Theory. RSRevision, n.d. Web.

Kant, and Causal Laws Analysis

1844 words - 7 pages ). Kant's Analogies of Experience. Chicago,University of Chicago Press. Gerd Buchdahl (1969). Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. Graham Bird (1973). Kant's Theory of Knowledge. New York, Humanities Press. Henry E. Allison (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press. Henry E. Allison (1981). Transcendental Schematism and The Problem of the Synthetic A Priori. Dialectica 35 (1):57-83. Immanuel

Is Nietzsche's view of morality better for us than Kant's?

935 words - 4 pages book "Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals," by Immanuel Kant, he states that being good should be the purpose of life. Kant says that if one is happy, he is more likely to fulfill his duty, which is to do good deeds. Kant's view of morality is better for us than Nietzsche's argument.Nietzsche remarks "To the extent that to make suffer was in the highest degree pleasurable, to the extent that the injured party exchanged for the loss he had

Kant's Categorical Imperative

851 words - 3 pages Immanuel Kant claims that moral judgments must be based on the categorical imperative. He argues for this claim by first exploring the characteristics of human decisions and actions that would make them distinctly moral. He then argues that the only principle of action that adequately accounts for these characteristics is the categorical imperative. I shall discuss Kant's argument by first explaining the characteristics that he thinks make

Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism

1395 words - 6 pages Kant's theory provides a more plausible account of ethics. Immanuel Kant's deonotological ethical theory assesses if actions are moral based on the person's will or intention of acting. Kant's theory can be categorized as a deonotological because "actions are not assessed to be morally permissible on the basis of consequences they produce, but rather on the form of the agent's will in acting," (Dodds, Lecture 7) therefore his actions are

Utilitarianism V. Kantianism

1360 words - 5 pages plausible account of ethics. Immanuel Kant's deonotological ethical theory assesses if actions are moral based on the person's will or intention of acting. Kant's theory can be categorized as a deonotological because "actions are not assessed to be morally permissible on the basis of consequences they produce, but rather on the form of the agent's will in acting," (Dodds, Lecture 7) therefore his actions are based on duty and not consequential

The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant

2526 words - 10 pages The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant Criticism is Kant's original achievement; it identifies him as one of the greatest thinkers of mankind and as one of the most influential authors in contemporary philosophy. But it is important to understand what Kant means by'criticism', or 'critique'. In a general sense the term refers to a general cultivation of reason 'by way of the secure path of science' (Bxxx). More particularly, its use is not

Similar Essays

What Is Enlightenment According To Immanuel Kant

645 words - 3 pages , every human has the right to the freedom of speech - although not everyone gets to exercise that right, as speaking out against tyrants may lead to dire consequences.         In Kant's ideology, the individual is entitled to publicly deliver reasoning, with the purpose of making improvements. However, in the private arena the reality of the individual's realisation of the truth is never shared. Immanuel Kant's theory is flawed in that

Philosophy: Emmanuel Kant Essay

1137 words - 5 pages obligation to life itself" ( Immanuel Kant). Kant's duty to have no worldview is because it's his own way of thought in a realistic way. In a nutshell PowerPoint his theory is above the world view Idealism/ Realism, But in deeper thought, " Kant claims that ethics should not be dependent on a particular worldview, his “duty based ethical theory is rooted in logic and language, and is in line with an Idealistic perspective"(RAE). Simply put

Mill And Kant's Efforts To Solve An Ethical Dilemma

1373 words - 6 pages : Broadview Press, 2004. Print. Baxley, Anne. Kant's Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Print. Denis, Lara. ‘Autonomy and the Highest Good.’ Kantian Review 10.1 (2005): 33-59. Formosa, Paul. ‘Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist?’ European Journal of Philosophy, 21.2 (2013): 170-196. Gao, Guoxi. ‘Kant's Virtue Theory.’ Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 5.2 (2010): 266-279. Print

Autonomous Thinking And Immanuel Kant Essay

830 words - 4 pages Considered to be one of the most important philosophers of modern Europe and an important part of philosophical thinking, Immanuel Kant paved the way for current ethical thinkers. He paved the way for philosophers and social behavioral scientists such as Jean Piaget. Kant's theory is hinged by his beliefs on autonomy and his formulation of categorical imperatives. Kant believed in autonomy however, knowing that autonomy has flaws, he created the