Immorality Of Assassinating Political Leaders Essay

849 words - 4 pages

More than thirty-five political leaders have been assassinated since 1825. The assassin and the political leader had different beliefs and ways they thought the government should have been run. It is thought by some, that assassination is the wrong choice to make when it comes to differences in beliefs. There are many reasons why people have different thoughts and actions on controversial subjects. Many people believe that killing is the wrong choice to make because it goes against our legal system, and it leads to social and political chaos. Lastly, killing is never justified based on religious beliefs.
First, one of the reasons many people believe that assassination is wrong, because it ...view middle of the document...

Suddenly, three shots rang out and the president slumped down, hit in the neck and head. Connally received a bullet in the back. Mrs. Kennedy held her husband’s head in her lap as the limousine raced to nearby Parkland Hospital” (Wilentz). Our thirty-fifth president was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald. His reasoning of taking John F. Kennedy’s life was because of Communism. The next event also went down in assassination history, two days later Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby as he was heading to the courts.
“Mohandas Gandhi was assassinated by an Indian who resented his program of tolerance for all creeds and religions” (“Gandhi”). Mohandas Gandhi, a free spirit leader, in the 1900s helped India to be free from the British. He was a discriminated Indian who claimed his life to be treated as a British. During his campaigns he had been arrested many times, went on fasts, and was nonviolent in passing on his religious beliefs. While being in prison for several years, he believed he was there for a good cause.
Another reason why assassination is wrong is it could lead to social and political chaos. As an African American minister, Martin Luther King Jr. caused great turmoil in the United States. The immediate shock, grief, and anger throughout the African American community. “A few months later, the Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which prohibited racial discrimination in the South and rental of most housing in the nation” (Garrow). MLK led several protesters from Selma to...

Find Another Essay On Immorality of Assassinating Political Leaders

Harry S. Truman and Julius Caesar Research Paper

1146 words - 5 pages immortal. This paper will overview both Truman and Caesar’s life before they ruled, their military experience, and the political influences they had while leading over their countries. Julius Caesar may be well known for his brilliance on the battlefield, but his overall leadership abilities comes no where near those of Harry Truman. Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most memorable leaders because of the wars he won and the way his life was ended

South Africa Under Apartheid: A Totalitarian State

1431 words - 6 pages were apparent during Apartheid, and will be structured in the format of the characteristics of a totalitarian state1. Political, economic and social spheres will be dealt with, with the main focus being on racial purity, a “reign of terror” and education. A totalitarian state involves many spheres being partly or wholly controlled by the state, and, often, the manipulation of the population to benefit the state. In South Africa, this was

Is Evil Human Nature The Cause of War?

1935 words - 8 pages not operate in accordance with the principles of Christian ethics; love thy neighbour, be peaceful and avoid war, always act in good faith and so on. Machiavelli saw these moral maxims as the height of political irresponsibility - if leaders were to act within these virtues their people would fall prey to the domination by force of others. In this regard Machiavellianism not only blames conflict on the immorality of political leaders, but advocates

Tragic Flaw of Brutus

868 words - 4 pages the good of Rome that he forgets about everything else, including his wife and friends. But besides his friends and family, Brutus gives trust to numerous people. Another of Brutus’ flaws is his trust of non-deserving people. Brutus does not want any unnecessary bloodshed; but believes it will make them look like butchers. Brutus is with the conspirators and they are discussing their plans of assassinating Caesar. Brutus wants to spare Antony

Julius Caesar

1297 words - 6 pages leaders that play down the important issues while putting dire consequences on frivolous matters that only worsen the state of things. Going further, this creates political turmoil that is not good for either the people on the lower end of the chain or those at the top swinging around. Things never go according to plan and the leaders simply do not care. They turn love into hate with a lot of pandering and butt kissing and make the most trivial and

Protestant Reformation

996 words - 4 pages politics rather than any theological disagreement) badly damaged the prestige of the church leaders. Papal tax collection methods were also attacked, and some criticized the papacy itself as an institution. Court records, written descriptions of bishop’s visitations of parishes and even popular songs and printed images show widespread anticlericalism, or opposition to the clergy. Much of the criticism towards the Roman Catholic Church was

A Comparison of Things Fall Apart and Julius Caesar

967 words - 4 pages traditional Umuofian religion where people were killed no practical reasons and punishments were given unjustly. Brutus betrays Caesar, his friend and superior in rank, by assassinating him. Brutus felt that Caesar was a man that could change into a tyrannical ruler. To kill him would be for the greater good of Rome. However, their actions were not completely the same. Nwoye did not kill anyone as Brutus had done. Nwoye was merely a child

The Cold War Summarized

1612 words - 6 pages the leadership of the Soviet Union after they were forced to back down. Fallowing the embarrassments in Korea and seeing that a war to displace a socialist leader is just too costly in lives and money, America adopted a new way to enforce its anti-communist policies by secretly assassinating the leaders of such nations, this would occur predominantly in South America. The Cold War affected the policy making of the US presidents from Harry

Comparison of Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln

1107 words - 4 pages threatened by their authority and power. The life of Julius Caesar is comparable to the life of Abraham Lincoln in a variety of ways. While unique similarities exist in the lives of these two men, distinct differences also exist. Abraham Lincoln was an orator; Julius Caesar a notable author of Latin prose. They were both leaders. Nowadays, people look up to them as heroes. They shared a significant amount of power in their respective nations. Both

Ho Chi Minh, Revolutionary Youth Leader

1789 words - 7 pages patriotic young people in a movement called the Dong Du (traveling to the east), from 1905-1908. Phan was a patriotic nationalist; he wanted an end to French monarchy, calling for Vietnamese democracy. Phan organized the movement in order to expel French colonialism by changing the political management of Vietnam. Due to the lack of Vietnamese schools in Vietnam, he sent scholars to gain knowledge from Japanese schools. Over the course of the movement

To what extent did Hitler come to power legally? How did Hitler came to power?

1777 words - 7 pages Cabinet. Hitler's "coup de tat" or coup by instalments was as good as sealed. The intimation and Nazi 'persuasive' tactics which gave Hitler Germany were definitely illegal and out with the spirit of the democratic constitution of Germany.On the 7th of April 1933 Hitler began to consolidate his power using the Enabling Act. On that day laws were passed to remove political opponents and Jews from the civil service and the legal professions. From the

Similar Essays

Margaret Hermann's Explaining Foreign Policy Behaviour Using The Personal Characteristics Of Political Leaders

1306 words - 5 pages Margaret Hermann's Explaining Foreign Policy Behaviour Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders Margaret Hermann’s main conclusion in her 1980 article “Explaining Foreign Policy Behaviour Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders”, is that the personal characteristics and orientations of foreign affairs of political leaders are important. However, one needs to be cognizant of the fact that

The Development Of Political Parties Between 1790 1810: Why Did The First Parties Arise? Who Were Their Leaders? What Impact Did The Parties Have On America

982 words - 4 pages George Washington himself thought it would be in America's best interest to avoid forming political parties. But even having said this Washington was already involved in the formation of one of the first political parties in America. In the beginning, before the Washington Administration, there were no parties; you were either for or against Congress and or independence. When the Constitutional Convention was called we see the first major

The Use Of Immorality In Order To Achieve Popular Rule

1469 words - 6 pages afraid of two things: “one is other rulers and the other is their own subjects.� Another limit to a leader’s use of immorality is that it can not upset the people so much that they begin to have hate for their leader. If a ruler’s cruelty gets to this point and puts disgust in his subjects, it has tragic ends. Machiavelli goes through the fates of “bloodthirsty and rapacious� leaders like Commodus, Severus, Antoninus Caracalla, and

Same Sex Marriage Essay

615 words - 3 pages Same sex marriage Same sex marriage has become one of the most controversial debates in today’s world. The debate cut across to all members of the society from human right activists, religion, political leaders, to common citizens. Various reasons have been used as the foundations of same sex debate. Some of which are religious beliefs and cultural practices. Different people argue differently with some arguing for while others against