Individual Rights Vs. National Security Essay

878 words - 4 pages

I negate the resolution, "Resolved: When the United States is engaged in military conflict, national security ought to supercede conflicting claims of individual rights. My value for the round is Human Dignity, or what can be defined as a respect for the individual and his or her rights and virtues. John Stuart Mill states that "Everyone who receive the protection of society owes a return for the benefit... but not to the point that it violates constituted rights." Thus those rights which are the fundamentals of human dignity must be maintained. No fundamental goal should ever undermine this fundamental goal. The criteria which must consistently achieve is the maintenance of a legitimate government, or a govt. that maximizes the rights of its citizensMy sole contention proves that a government's legitimacy is contingent upon its preservation of individual rights. According to Charles Ogletree, Professor of Law at Harvard University, "The U.S. has not been a fertile breeding ground for terrorism... diversity, religious and ethnic tolerance, a reliance on legal proceedings open to public scrutiny... are all values make it hard to nurture in the U.S. the ethnic or religious hatred that fuels much terrorism." Unfortunately, sacrificing such virtues for temporary security would undermine these values. The impact is clear, that a removal of individual rights, such as freedom of speech or freedom of press, would uproot key American ideals and neglect the value of the individual within the United States. . The government would no longer protect the foundation upon with it was built, and such actions would illegitimatize the government. As reported by Susan Stanberg, political analyst for National Public Radio, "Muslim communities throughout Florida have placed complains in the FBI's strategy in placing undercover agents in mosques to find our terrorists." This type of drastic action has also been taken up by new laws that grant police powers to search people travelling on public transportation without notifying them of their right to refuse the search and without sufficient evidence or suspicion; a severe incursion on the right to privacy. Police acknowledge this fact, stating that they have nothing else to go on. This impact is that investigations based upon ethnicity encourage citizens to do the same thing. This arouses xenophobia and hostility towards foreign groups of American society. Secondly, Prioritizing national security gives the govt. license to violate human worth in 3 ways: i. Dictating life choices - relocating people/Japanese internment camps ii. Dictating moral choices - whether to fight in war (draft) iii. Actually taking liberty and property - violating the rights of innocents in...

Find Another Essay On Individual Rights Vs. National Security

Indiviual Privacy vs National Security Essay

1499 words - 6 pages ‘Angry Birds’-- were used as a cover up from the National Security Agency (NSA) to observe and record citizen’s actions. Yet in a fast paced life, humans don’t stop and think about these occurrences and continue on living their lives. Connecting to Restak, he stated that technology has enveloped humanity into a restricted time limit to our surroundings as technology is at our central focus. Because the brain’s attention span is short to focus on

National Security vs. the Right to Privacy

3061 words - 12 pages authentication for airport maintenance workers, armed air marshals traveling on flights, and teaching flight attendants are all examples of suggested security measures that have no effect on individual privacy or liberties. (Schneier 773) This is simply one way that security can be achieved without hindering privacy. It is still necessary to check I.D. and do background checks on suspicious persons; however, it is not necessary to constantly

COINTELPRO-National Security Vs. Civil Liberty

1455 words - 6 pages COINTELPRO, that has not been tested because American government has acted before it gets a chance to react when it comes to issues of national security. However there is a flip side to the coin. A valid point is that COINTELPRO in retrospect looks horrible now; it might have been necessary at the time, to protect national security. Today we live in fear of terrorism, just like in the 1950's we lived in fear of communism. Who's to say that today certain groups and individuals are not secretly being persecuted and destroyed. No one knows, nor may we ever know. In the end it comes down to a question of individual rights versus national security.

The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001: Need for National Security vs. Protection of Civil Liberties

1436 words - 6 pages In a post-September 11th America, it is not uncommon for the mentioning of the word “terrorist” to spark any number of emotions in its citizens. In response to activities such as the attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, as well as the 2001 anthrax scares, Congress proposed the USA PATRIOT Act. Supporters of the Act cite the importance and immeasurable need for greater protection in terms of national security, which is the government’s

Individual Rights vs. State's Rights

1000 words - 4 pages Lance ItoEssay #1February 12, 1997In the reviewing the case of Planck v. Indiana, many complicated issues arise. Included in those, individual rights conflicting with the public good are among the most difficult. According to Mr and Mrs. Planck's attorney, John Price, the Planck's religious beliefs prohibit them from accepting professional medicine practice, as they practice alternative medicine and home school their children. After a complaint

Civil Liberties VS National Security

683 words - 3 pages someone's phone line, but eventually, they will want to put spy cameras in people's residences, and video record their private lives at home. This law can only lead to one bad thing after another. People's freedoms and privacies should not be sacrificed in the names of "safety" and "prevention."The Espionage Act of 1917 is a perfect example of when Americans' liberties were taken away in the name of national security. After the US entered WW1

Police Authority vs Individual Rights

1117 words - 4 pages freedoms and upholding the law, their job (Barkan, 2012). Police officers are allowed to think what they want or say how they feel, a right granted to them in the Bill of Rights. However, under the badge, police officers are required and expected to abide by the laws of the United States. Sometimes, the level of authority police hold in this situation can get them into trouble legally. This is what we call police misconduct (Barkan, 2012

National Security vs. the Right to Privacy

790 words - 3 pages rethinking will concern law-how we will balance understandable demands for improved security with our right to privacy, our freedom to travel, our free speech, our policy of welcoming immigrants, and our commitment to a tolerant society. Once we learn how the terrorists learned to fly these Boeing planes, should we place new restrictions on pilot training? Access to flight simulators? First Amendment experts may rightly be concerned about such


783 words - 3 pages ; relationships are more important in deciding what is right/good (CHINA - contracts don't matter so much, acts as a starting point only)Universal: contracts govern business relationships (lawyers are essential in the US!)Individualism vs. communitarianismIndividualistic: focus on self, personal freedom, competitiveness (laws and rules preserve rights of individual) [NETHERLANDS]Communitarian: group membership, social responsibility, harmonious

The Controversy Over New Airport Security Measures

2017 words - 8 pages unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” ("The Constitution of the United States," Amendment 4).Aside from the individual rights issue, many argue that the new security measures are not effective in countering terrorism anyway. They argue that terrorists will just change their methods to fit the new security system. Bruce Schneier, a security expert

National ID, a bad idea….

1727 words - 7 pages criminals. When people have to produce identity papers on demand, they will be being searched illegally. If people are caught and they could not prove their identity, then they would be put in custody illegally until they prove their identity. Sarfaraz Khan says “……..It offers only a false sense of security and won't enhance our security, but it does pose serious threats to our civil liberties and civil rights. A national ID won't keep us safe or

Similar Essays

Individual Privacy Versus National Security Essay

1871 words - 7 pages definition of the word clues to the term “freedom”. The aforementioned definition of security is very general. It does not stipulate the individual whose security is at issue or the types of values pliable to being secured. The security of people (“human security”) is understood to extend beyond national security, also comprising of economic welfare, the health of the environment, cultural identity, and political rights. Security began to take on a

An Analysis Of Cell Phone Technology, Security, And Individual Rights

1056 words - 4 pages An Analysis of Cell Phone Technology, Security, and Individual Rights In this technology driven era, I question what effect cell phones are having on our lives as American citizens? To investigate this, I read two articles. The first reading was “Mobile Phone Tracking Scrutinized” by Nikki Swartz originally published in the Information Management Journal for March/April 2006, and the second reading was “Reach out and Track Someone” by Terry

Why The American Government Has The Authority To Take Away Our Rights During The Time Of War And That National Security Supercedes The Rights Of The People.

1394 words - 6 pages National SecurityWhen the United States is engaged in military conflict, do the demands of national security supercede conflicting claims of individual rights?" ...Only the greatest dangers can outweigh that of changing the public order, and the sacred power of the laws should never be interfered with except when the safety of the country is at stake". Because I agree with these words given by a great philosopher of the social contract, Jean

National Security Vs. Civil Liberties. Essay

533 words - 2 pages The recent September 11th attacks have caused many Americans to wonder about the personal sacrifices to be made in order to keep the nation "safe and free." With mixed results, it has become a common practice throughout history to restrict personal freedoms in the name of national security. Many questions arise from this process: Where is the line drawn? If liberties are restricted do they ever truly return? If it is true that we are doomed