PHL 311 – fall 2013 Rudy Nader
Dr.Salameh ID: 20112192
PHL311 Second Report – 11/16/2013
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Stem cell research debates have echoed from class to class, and to hear that someone actually has a solution to this paradox, which can really compromise two very stubborn points of views, I could not but write my report about what I thought of a very “enlightening” article:
1. Objective analysis.
Maureen L Condic’s “Getting stem cells rights” serves to emphasize the ethical part of stem cells research as it tries to ground the whole debate and market a new prospect of an embryonic stem cell called the induced pluripotent stem cells. The author clearly supports the latter and wishes to completely focus all research on it and forget about the “unethical” embryonic stem cell research.
She took to pen to 1) present this new prospect 2) rebuttal the response of present embryonic stem cell researchers, and 3) completely support the new IPSC research as a call for action to end embryonic stem cell research.
1) Author presents and informs about IPSC in :
-”A true, no-cost resolution of a conflict, where the interests of all parties are served without compromise.”
- Ongoing research that has shown “ordinary human skins” can be changed into stem cells by a process called direct reprogramming equal to embryonic stem cells.
-Production of IPSC is very simple.
-No destruction of embryos taking place
-Ethically and scientifically “uncompromised”
-Research though still in its infancy
-Simpler and cheaper to produce than embryonic stem cells.
-eligible for federal funding
2) Author rebuttals what she corralled from different sources from which scientists aimed to say that embryonic stem cell research must go on even after the findings of IPSCs. Maureen a) listed their reasons for support of embryonic reasoning. b) Compared to two methods c)lists own reasons to why embryonic research should stop
a) She finds researchers saying that embryonic stem cell research should continue in :
“These findings do not obviate the need for research using human embryonic stem cells; rather the different avenues of human stem cell research should be pursued side by side.” - The International Society for Stem Cell Research
“This is exactly the wrong time to constrain research on human embryonic stem cells.”- Nature magazine
b) Author compared the two methods in :
-Pluripotent stem cells derived from human embryos vs. cells with the same properties in an ethically uncompromised way
-Human cloning as means of generating patient-specific stem cells vs. production from adult...