Innate Ideas Essay

914 words - 4 pages

Innate Ideas

Throughout the passage of time, philosophers have written and discussed many topics in philosophy. Sometimes, these philosophers agree on ideas or sometimes they make their own assumptions. There are two philosophers who had different ideas concerning where innate ideas come from and how we get these types of ideas. Rene Descartes and John Locke were these two philosophers with the opposing argument on innate ideas. The place where Descartes discusses his views were in the Meditations on First Philosophy and Locke's argument is located in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. By using these sources I will be able to describe the difference between these two arguments on innate ideas.
Rene Descartes was a mathematician and an extremely brilliant man. In mediation three, Descartes is trying to establish God. With the establishing of God the discussion on where ideas come from is brought up. Also, in mediation three Descartes gets to the idea of God and where innate ideas come from by negating ideas. Descartes says you should agree with two things. He has a term called ex mihilio, which means something can't come from nothing. Also he says there must be at least as much reality in the cause as there is in the effect. He realizes that God is a perfect being and to get to the idea of God certain ideas must be looked at. The negating idea is key to his theory. Descartes asks himself where do we get ideas. By using negation he comes to the conclusion that ideas don't come from the world or the imagination, because the world contains material objects and perfection does not exist. He says God can't be imagined because you can't put all the imperfection in the world to make perfection. So Descarte finds that God does exist. Descartes says, "God demonstrates most evidently that God too exists." Finally, he must know where did this idea of God come from. He specifically says he didn't draw it from his senses. He didn't make the idea of God he says the idea was imprinted on him. He makes the conclusion by stating, "Thus the only option remaining is that this idea is innate in me just as the idea of myself is innate in me." God imprints the innate idea of Him on us at birth and that is why we know of God. An example of this is how a craftsman imprints his signature on his work. Descartes says he gets innate ideas from God because God instills the idea of himself onto us, which is an innate idea.

Find Another Essay On Innate Ideas

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

1923 words - 8 pages principles. He explains that through experience and knowledge from previous ideas or persons humans make up these principles. This once again proves that the principles are not innate because they are taught to us. Even though, he does remark that humans believe the principles to be innate. He supports this by stating that men cannot remember with certainty when they acquired the knowledge of these principles and therefore, they simply think that God

an essay with personal opinions on hume and descartes on the theory of ideas

613 words - 2 pages David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers with opposing views about the origination of ideas. Descartes believed there were three types of ideas which are, innate, adventitious and those from imagination. He stated since he exists and his idea of what a perfect being is, such as God, then God exists. Hume, on the other had, believed ideas came only from one thing, impressions. Both theories have their strengths and weaknesses but I like

John Locke: Human Understanding

1793 words - 7 pages When considering knowledge, Locke is interested in the ability for us to know something, the capacity of gathering and using information and understanding the limits of what we know. He believes this also leads him to realise what we perhaps, cannot know. [1] He wants to find out about the origin of our ideas. His main stand-point is that we don’t have innate ideas and he aims to get rid of the sceptical doubt about what we know. The innate

Framing the Innateness Hypothesis

1597 words - 6 pages that language acquisition is instead a process of generalization from experience. Underlying these two positions are specific hypotheses regarding the resources the child brings to the task of acquiring language. The rationalist postulates the existence of innate ideas and/or principles, while the empiricist does not. Chomsky's position, as he consistently has acknowledged for decades, is rationalist. As he put it not long after Aspects appeared

Is violence innate of is it learned.

1145 words - 5 pages Genetically inherited or Innate?Genetically inherited or environmentally learned? This question has been asked dating back to the eighteenth century. Is human aggression genetically linked or is it the environment that determines our aggressive nature. Both ideas will be conversed in the following essay. Violence in today's culture can be learned in many diverse ways ranging from Television shows to psychological reasons, but on the other hand

John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume

1333 words - 5 pages John Locke, Berkeley and Hume are all empiricist philosophers. They all have many different believes, but agree on the three anchor points; The only source of genuine knowledge is sense experience, reason is an unreliable and inadequate route to knowledge unless it is grounded in the solid bedrock of sense experience and there is no evidence of innate ideas within the mind that are known from experience. Each of these philosophers


968 words - 4 pages that empiricists deny that human beings possess innate ideas or cannot acquire any knowledge without reference to experience is nothing more than skepticism, bordering cynicism. Humans possess a certain essence within them when they are born. It derives at birth, and is with us throughout our entire life span. This intangible essence is the quality of good. Human beings have an innate sense of right and wrong without the need of experiencing the

Rationalism Vs Empiricism

2210 words - 9 pages organizing our ideas, as in mathematics, but that is all. There are no innate ideas in empiricism; all of our ideas are built up from our experience. They are well known as Hume, Lock and Berkeley. All of them try to find answers to the same metaphysical and epistemological questions. Some of these questions are ¡°What is knowledge?¡± ¡°Is there certainty knowledge?¡± and ¡°Does God exist

Rationalism Vs Empiricism

2210 words - 9 pages organizing our ideas, as in mathematics, but that is all. There are no innate ideas in empiricism; all of our ideas are built up from our experience. They are well known as Hume, Lock and Berkeley. All of them try to find answers to the same metaphysical and epistemological questions. Some of these questions are ¡°What is knowledge?¡± ¡°Is there certainty knowledge?¡± and ¡°Does God exist

Themes in "Lord of the Flies"

684 words - 3 pages William Goldning’s Lord of the Flies is an allegorical novel where literary techniques are utilized to convey the main ideas and themes of the novel. Two important central themes of the novel includes loss of civilization and innocense which tie into the concept of innate human evil. Loss of civilization is simply the transition from civilization to savagery; order to chaos. The concept of loss of innocense is a key concept to innate human evil

The Origin of Ideas

1139 words - 5 pages ". Locke believes that all our ideas come from experience. The mind has no innate ideas, it has only innate abilities. Our mind is like a clean white sheet of paper. It is experiences that fill our sheets of paper with characters and symbols (33). Locke also compares our acquisition of ideas to that of a child coming into the world. If the child grew up in a world of black and white he would know nothing (have no ideas) of a world of green

Similar Essays

Innate Ideas Essay

1552 words - 6 pages In efforts to find truth, Descartes used only his logic to identify his existence. He also proved that there is some type of knowledge that we are born with. “Some of our ideas seem to be “born with me,” some “invented” by me, whereas others “come from without” (Descartes, 2008, p. 211). Which means Descartes believed that we enter this world with some innate ideas that overtime helps us to develop understanding of our sense (invented by me

Descartes’ Ambiguity Of Innate And Adventitious Ideas

1931 words - 8 pages In Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes illustrates that the objective reality of some of his ideas seems so great that he cannot be the cause of such ideas, thus something else also exists in the world (29). Though Descartes inquires particularly into adventitious ideas to support his claim, he does not offer the definitions of innate and adventitious ideas clearly, nor does he explain the differences of them in any detail. In this paper

Nature Vs. Nurture: John Locke On Innate Ideas

1705 words - 7 pages In book one of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, John Locke argues against innate ideas using three arguments. The intention of this paper will be to discuss John Locke’s views on ideas while introducing and explaining his three arguments against innate ideas in detail touching on his idea of tabula rasa. Furthermore, it will briefly discuss alternative views on innate ideas as both conflicting and similar. John Locke’s writings came at

John Locke Essay

1676 words - 7 pages Marques JohnsonApril 13, 2014Essay Concerning Human UnderstandingBook I, Chapter II: "No Innate Principles in the Mind"As the title suggests, the main problem in this chapter of Locke's Essay is whether or not innate principles exist in the mind. The term "innate principles" refers to ideas which are necessarily in the mind by the time of birth. This is what John Locke's Chapter II is all about. The concept from Locke is that these innate ideas