Innate Knowledge Essay

626 words - 3 pages

Innate Knowledge The theory of innate knowledge is very interesting. I am going to explain what it is, the different views that philosophers have on it, and if I think that it is possible to be born with it. Once finished, you can decide for yourself what your feelings on innate knowledge are.Innate knowledge is a theory that was brought into this world by the great philosopher Socrates. Socrates said that everyone comes into this world with knowledge that they already had from previous lives. He said that the body was new, but the soul already had knowledge. The soul had forgotten the knowledge and simply needed to be reminded of it.Socrates explanation was that when one dies, they must cross the River of Lethe. On the way across, they drink from the river, and all of their previously acquired knowledge is forgotten. After they cross the river, they are born again. Since they are born with all of this forgotten knowledge, all they have to do is be reminded of it.Here is an example of innate knowledge that I remember from class. When a baby decides to crawl from one point to another, it will take the shortest path possible. Instead of taking a detour, the baby crawls to its destination in a straight line. If the theory of innate knowledge is true, then the baby must have learned in another lifetime that the shortest path between two points is a straight line.Another great philosopher, named John Locke, had a different view on innate knowledge. He believed that there was no such thing. Locke had a theory called "Tabula Rasa." This theory states that when we are born, our minds are like a blank sheet of paper. We know nothing and learn everything through experience. As we learn, we...

Find Another Essay On Innate Knowledge

Nature vs. Nurture: John Locke on Innate Ideas

1705 words - 7 pages In book one of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, John Locke argues against innate ideas using three arguments. The intention of this paper will be to discuss John Locke’s views on ideas while introducing and explaining his three arguments against innate ideas in detail touching on his idea of tabula rasa. Furthermore, it will briefly discuss alternative views on innate ideas as both conflicting and similar. John Locke’s writings came at

Hume Essay

968 words - 4 pages I will be studying human nature according to David Hume and his philosophical views on the empirical method. I only slightly disagree with the views of Hume. My theory is that we do gain a large amount of our knowledge through experience. This cannot be argued. However, I also believe that human beings possess knowledge that is innate, or a priori, such as morals and our ability to reason. However, I will discredit Hume's "matter of fact

John Locke: Human Understanding

1793 words - 7 pages When considering knowledge, Locke is interested in the ability for us to know something, the capacity of gathering and using information and understanding the limits of what we know. He believes this also leads him to realise what we perhaps, cannot know. [1] He wants to find out about the origin of our ideas. His main stand-point is that we don’t have innate ideas and he aims to get rid of the sceptical doubt about what we know. The innate

Rationalism Vs Empiricism

2210 words - 9 pages In this paper I will discuss the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They believe in rationalism or empiricism respectively. Rationalist believed that an important group of fundamental concepts are known intuitively through reason, opposite to experience. For rationalist, the knowledge is innate and that it can¡¯t come from sources such as the senses. They are well known as

Rationalism Vs Empiricism

2210 words - 9 pages In this paper I will discuss the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They believe in rationalism or empiricism respectively. Rationalist believed that an important group of fundamental concepts are known intuitively through reason, opposite to experience. For rationalist, the knowledge is innate and that it can¡¯t come from sources such as the senses. They are well known as

Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning

923 words - 4 pages , derives his knowledge from ideas and reason, all of which stem from an instance of natural light. The empiricists, however, do not believe in natural light and therefore do not hold knowledge to be derived from these innate ideas. David Hume is one of these empiricists. Hume was a scientist and an atheist; his occupation and beliefs disallowed him from holding innate ideas to be a valid basis for knowledge. In An Enquiry Concerning

The main tenets of both rationalistic and empiricist epistemologies?

1469 words - 6 pages . Observations must be maid to gain knowledge (ex. It is raining outside). These opposing arguments are those made by rationalists and empiricists in terms of how we acquire knowledge. Rationalism is the position in epistemology that holds that knowledge is acquired through reason and without the aid of our senses. Rationalism holds that innate ideas exist, which allows us to know things a priori. One of the best examples of this would be

John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume

1333 words - 5 pages John Locke, Berkeley and Hume are all empiricist philosophers. They all have many different believes, but agree on the three anchor points; The only source of genuine knowledge is sense experience, reason is an unreliable and inadequate route to knowledge unless it is grounded in the solid bedrock of sense experience and there is no evidence of innate ideas within the mind that are known from experience. Each of these philosophers

Descartes - Ontological Argument

1044 words - 4 pages knowledge is discovered because of sensory input, besides the knowledge of God. Hence, our ideas of God are innate. We know for certain this knowledge must have been hardwired by another being. This ontological argument is required here because questioning God's intentions is necessary for addressing Descartes skeptical arguments. The skeptical challenge is addressed by questioning if God actually exists. God's existence can further be examined through

Do infants have an innate ability to recognise the human face and imitate facial expressions?

1664 words - 7 pages The debate over whether or not infants are born with innate knowledge has been a long one. Nativist philosophers such as Kant (1781/1958) and Descartes (1638/1965) believed that certain abilities and understandings about the world were innate, whereas Empiricist William James (1890) believed, infants were a tabula rasa (blank slate) upon which information is "written". Even today the debate over whether or not infants are born with innate

Knowledge of Good in Plato's The Republic

970 words - 4 pages mysterious understanding of any other sort. Why would Socrates think that an intellectual knowledge of good is a sufficient condition for being good? Well, Socrates also seems believes that goodness is innate in human beings and that people who have seen what goodness is will want to be good. According to him "the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already" and there is "some art which will effect conversion in the easiest and quickest

Similar Essays

Innate Knowledge And Death Essay

2132 words - 9 pages Tapping into innate knowledge is a mystery that has baffled generations of learned men and women denying them the ability to state for certain and true that knowledge is liken unto a shared casserole at a family or company picnic; that everyone can reach within and draw forth the realization of corporeal understanding from the resources of disembodied knowledge and make the same their own. According to the Advanced English Dictionary, knowledge

Innate Ideas Essay

914 words - 4 pages born with innate ideas but is received through the senses and experience. Locke makes a statement in Book II about experience, which says, "In that all our Knowledge is founded; and from that it ultimately derives itself." In conclusion, these two philosophers have different ideas on where innate ideas come from. What are we suppose to believe? Descartes theory that innate ideas come from God, and that God instills these ideas on us at birth

John Locke Essay

1676 words - 7 pages , innate ideas don't exist and everything that comes into the mind is from experience. Innate ideas are ideas that are said to be implanted in the human mind without any prior knowledge or experience leading to that idea's origin. Innate ideas originate in the human mind and not from anything external, outside of the mind.The principles that most do agree with by all rational minds are called "universal principles." The Aristotelian logical

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding

1923 words - 8 pages principles. He explains that through experience and knowledge from previous ideas or persons humans make up these principles. This once again proves that the principles are not innate because they are taught to us. Even though, he does remark that humans believe the principles to be innate. He supports this by stating that men cannot remember with certainty when they acquired the knowledge of these principles and therefore, they simply think that God