Scientific evidence demonstrates that vaccine inoculation can cause complications including disability and death. What is causing this shift in immune-prophylaxis, from the initial goal of eradicating contagious diseases, to becoming a killer inoculation? Are we still free to defend and decide for our health, or is there a danger of government actions with mass- vaccination mandates?
There is a justified alarming concern on vaccines, not only in the population worldwide, but also in the medical personnel. The theory stated in some scientific groups, is that vaccines are not only harmful but also useless. In matter of health issues, science is the only honest filter we can use, looking at the critical dilemma on vaccinations, in order to prove that indiscriminate vaccine immunizations are dangerous, causing chronic injuries, lifetime disabilities and often death.
There is a media informational war about immunizations. On one front "the crusaders against the vaccines", mainly people who had loved ones ruined by vaccine complications. Some of these become extremists, and in the name of an alleged crisis of scientific paradigms, look to the solution being ”A non-pharmacological medicine“. On the other front, one part of the medical world, vehemently supported by some multinational pharmaceutical companies, assigns to immune prophylaxis the defeat of any infective disease. Beyond the extremist positions, the debate on vaccinations reveals profound ethical implications. It is interconnecting with the right to freedom of choice that should mark all the actions of protection in health matters and personal integrity.
To understand what is going on, we need to scrutinize the infinite available data, filtering them through many patterns, such as: pharmaceutical interests, government’s goals to eliminate, as much as possible, any contagious disease at low cost, and probably attempts to prevent or test any form of bioterrorism.
It is certainly true that he, who self-causes an illness or injury, indirectly harms society, but it would be dangerous to give to the State the paternalistic power to decide what is good or bad for all of its citizens.
Dr. Ron Paul’s “Government Vaccines — Bad Policy, Bad Medicine” in this sense is clear.
In the Article, he talks about the damages deriving from smallpox vaccine and the danger of an administrative mandate for vaccine inoculation, to military and medical personnel. He affirms that medical personnel should make these decisions not the government, and that the benefit does not balance the risk of the vaccine. He lists the dangerous side effects of it.
Dr. Ron Paul talks about freedom being in danger:
“Freedom over one’s physical person is the most basic freedom of all, and people in a free society should be sovereign over their own bodies. When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we in essence accept that the state owns our bodies. The possibility that the federal...