“Couch suffers from “affluenza,” according to his lawyer. Which means that his wealthy parents pretty much let him get away with everything,” explains the Time article (Grey). In 2013 Keller, Texas a sixteen year old teen Ethan Couch, was driving drunk, passed the speed limit and crashed, causing four innocent deaths. Judge Jean Boyd, was going to give him 20 years in states custody but Couch’s attorney told Judge Jean Boyd, Couch did not know the difference from right or wrong and was able to convince Judge Boyd to only give him 10 years in rehab; in which the parents were willing to pay 450,000 a year for treatment. The rehab center was like a spa or a 10 years vacation. Many people are angry because they are abusing insanity defense and should be tested. Some people don’t care and just want freedom of thoughts. Although insanity defense is sometimes abused, it is a justifiable alternative to prison.
According to the article” The Durham rule was eventually rejected by the federal courts, because it cast too broad a net. Alcoholics, compulsive gamblers, and drug addicts had successfully used the defense to defeat a wide variety of crimes,”(Insanity) this shows how people would abuse the insanity defense to get out of a crime. There was this case where John Hinckley schizophrenia, and was charged of assault because he beat a stranger in the bus for no reason. John was explaining he was hearing voices that he could not control. He knew what he did was wrong, but his impulse was uncontrollable, and because of his problem he was not guilty.
In 1843, an Englishman named Daniel M’Naghten killed Secretary British Minister. Daniel thought British minister was conspiring Daniel. The court put him in for Insanity Defense and was put in a mental hospital. There was a public madness, and Queen Victoria wanted him tested. Daniel abused Insanity and court said insanity can only be used if only tested. Then in 1972, the law institute of legal experts made a new rule for insanity. Which means if the defendant is not responsible for the crime because the defendant is mentally ill. Also, did not have the capacity to appreciate criminality of their conduct to have requirements of the law.in 1948, congress pass the crime control act. Insanity how requires the defendant to prove he or she is mentally ill. When the defendants were stating their case they were a result of mentally ill. They were not accepting their crime of how wrong it was. This is to know the right from wrong.
The case of Mr. Weinstein was that he strangled his wife and made it seem like it was suicide by throwing her out of a twelve floor apartment. The lawyer told judge that his brain was a spider web and this caused him to do violence he supposedly did not know. Then the judge said any person with a mental issue or anyone that doesn’t know from right or wrong or had a bad childhood should not be guilty. Which means anybody can be executed. On October 1992 Judge Richard said that Weinstein’s...