Inner Evil Revealed In Film And Bbc Productions Of Shakespeare’s Richard Iii

1334 words - 5 pages

Inner Evil Revealed in Film and BBC Productions of Shakespeare’s Richard III

    All the passions of the irascible rise from the passions of the concupiscible appetite and terminate in them. For instance, anger rises from sadness, and, having wrought vengeance, terminates in joy.

--  St. Thomas Aquinas

       In Richard III, Shakespeare creates evil personified.  The wicked protagonist conspires against kin, plots political takeovers, woos widows, sets assassins against children, and relishes each nefarious act.  We watch Richard's bravado with wicked glee and delight in each boasting comment sent our direction.  Once the bad guy becomes seductive, even amusing, in his blatant cruelty, the playwright must intervene to counterbalance his own brilliant wit.  But how can this devil Richard be brought to his knees with the appropriate high style demanded by the script's momentum?  Shakespeare leaves us the briefest of stage direction: "Alarum. Enter Richard and Richmond; they fight; Richard is slain" (V.v.).  Once "the bloody dog is dead," Richmond prays for "smooth-faced peace" (V.v.2,33).  So soon after Richard's tormented dream of accusing ghosts, this closing scene enforces a mood described by Robert Ornstein as "one of somber reflection, not of joyous celebration" (263).  However, the interpretive liberties taken by three twentieth-century filmmakers establish elaborated messages about the horrors of bloodshed, the inevitability of power struggles, and the mythmaking of villains.

       The 1982 BBC production takes the audience through a series of reactions: the bloodthirst for revenge, the prayer for redemption, and the vision of hellish destruction.  We watch Richard circled by soldiers, baited like a bear as swords close in.  We hear grunts of rage, brutish and coarse.  Richard drops to his knees and claws forward, lost in private agonies.  The camera focuses on his face; we observe the hard swallowing of a final mouthful of air.  Richmond fails to glory immediately in his victory but rather responds with distaste, with a slight gagging in revulsion, before declaring the battle's end and praying for peace.  If the film ended here, the audience might leave confident that order could be restored and that a new regime could surpass the old.  Yet in a final surreal scene, the camera twists upward through a mountain of bloodied corpses.  Wild-haired Margaret cackles -- part horror and part triumph -- from atop the flesh pile, clutching Richard's body.  Director Jane Howell emphasizes the body count and the tragic sacrifice of so many young men to civil strife.  But the extremism of crazed laughter juxtaposed with contorted victims challenges more than warlord policies: Where is God when human-devils control the political scene? Why does divinity create a flawed offspring and then abandon humanity to the race of Cain?  Richard becomes just one more body and violent revenge seems inadequate.  Evil leaks off the screen, stains...

Find Another Essay On Inner Evil Revealed in Film and BBC Productions of Shakespeare’s Richard III

Glorifying the Tudor Dynasty: Shakespeare’s Richard III and the Perfect Villain

1203 words - 5 pages particular work and author Dorothea Pries discusses how More’s depiction treats Richard III as “an evil, tyrannical king” (Pries). Shakespeare adapts this image in addition to Machiavelli’s and furthers the horridness of this character through the depiction of events that lead to his rise and downfall. When the character exclaims before his fight with Henry that “If not to heaven, then had in hand to hell,” (347) Shakespeare links his actions to

Film Review of Richard Loncraine's Adaptation of William Shakespeare's Richard III

1696 words - 7 pages Film Review of Richard Loncraine's Adaptation of William Shakespeare's Richard III "Civil war divides the nation" the first caption we see at the onset of this adaptation of Shakespeare's Richard III sets the tone for scenes to come later in the movie. It starts by focusing on Shakespeare's underlying tone regarding Richard as somewhat an outlandish character to be mocked and amused by. Enter Richard to "stab" Edward in his war room at

'Richard is a truly evil character with no justification for his actions'. To what extent do you agree with this assessment of Richard's character in Shakespeare's Richard III?

834 words - 3 pages actions, it is his last minute regret which causes me to believe that he isn't truly evil.Richard shows in many situations throughout the play Richard III that he is an evil character. His arranging for the death of Clarence, and his treatment of Lady Anne are clearly evil acts. Considering this however, he still manages to maintain justification for his actions, based on a hatred of his own deformity, and a powerful desire to become King of England

Themes of Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure Revealed in Angelo’s Soliloquies

821 words - 3 pages Themes of Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure Revealed in Angelo’s Soliloquies Angelo’s soliloquies (2.2.161-186; 2.4.1-30) express themes of the tragicomic form, grace and nature, development of self-knowledge, justice and mercy, and creation and death as aspects of Angelo’s character. By the theme of the tragicomic form I mean that which “qualified extremes and promoted a balanced condition of mind […] It employed a ‘mixed’ style

The Portrayal of Socially Destructive and Over-Ambitious Richard, in Shakespeare's Richard III

2887 words - 12 pages Richard, the main character of the Shakespeare’s play, Richard III is portrayed as socially destructive and politically over-ambitious. His destructive potential is depicted by the way he relates with the other protagonists in the play and also by what he confesses as his intentions. Richard’s political ambition is revealed through his strategic calculations based on the order of birth in his York family which puts him third away from the

The Scrivener and History in Richard III

2602 words - 10 pages remains that the play itself is a construction taken as a propagandistic enterprise. “In the reign of Elizabeth,” writes Charnes, “the playwright himself is subject to the immediate political constraints of his material” (68-69). Shakespeare’s writing under the influence of a Tudor queen must construct history in a manner befitting this bias. Queen Elizabeth is a Tudor queen, which is the family who defeats Richard III historically, and who

Richard III and the Stability of England

1253 words - 5 pages restless and unsettled? Is it a good thing that Henry Tudor defeated him in the Battle of Bosworth? This essay will look at the different points, which, under the reign of Richard III made the country stable or unstable. England under Richard III was stable in that he had lots of experience. He had been made ruler of the North of England in 1471 and had been allowed to Marry Anne due to his loyalty to his brother Edward IV

Comparison of King Richard III and Looking for Richard

1603 words - 6 pages constructed a history intermixed with Tudor history, and More’s connection to John Morton affected the villainous image of the tyrannous king. This negative image is accentuated through the antithesis of Richards treachery in juxtaposition of Richmond’s devotion, exemplified in the parallelism of ‘God and Saint George! Richmond and victory.’ The need to legitimize Elizabeth’s reign influenced Shakespeare’s portrayal of Richard III as a means of

Comparison of King Richard III and Looking for Richard

911 words - 4 pages Connection between texts shapes your understanding of context and valuesExaminations of Shakespeare's play 'King Richard III' and Pacino's docu-drama 'Looking for Richard' reveals relationships between the texts and their respective audience. The fifteenth century and twentieth century contexts demonstrates the values of each text and enables understanding of how the film enriches the ideas presented in the play. 'King Richard III' portrays a

The Universal Inner Struggle Revealed in Hamlet

864 words - 3 pages The Universal Inner Struggle Revealed in Hamlet       Life is defined by the struggles it presents us.  Without these constant tests of our fortitude, we would never grow as mature human beings.  This is the one common denominator linking all people, past, present, and future.  It is no mystery why our literature and art reflect this characteristic.   The creation of a character is a mirror-image of a human.  Shakespeare perfectly

Characteristics of Richard III

1063 words - 4 pages murder of the Princes in the Tower. Richard III was first introduced in Henry VI where he announces how he will metaphorically hew his way to the throne by changing shapes and setting the "murderous Machiavel" to school.In Richard III, Richard is the major character in which he is both the protagonist of the story and its major villain. Richard can be seen as an intense exploration of the psychology of evil. However, towards the end of the play

Similar Essays

Déjà Vu: Motifs Of Hitler In Richard Iii(1995) And How They Help Modern Audience To Understand Shakespeare’s Richard

1869 words - 8 pages connection to Nazi Germany; very details include costume design, set and prop, and cinematography choices all closely relate Richard to Hitler, an equivalent villain from modern history. The choice of blending Hitler into Richard puts viewers now into the shoes of audience from Shakespeare’s time to better understand Richard’s evil; although Richard III is quite ancient, Hitler is still a new scar. The déjà vu of Nazi dystopia becomes interesting

Richard Loncraine’s Rendition Of William Shakespeare’s Richard Iii

972 words - 4 pages rejection of historical fact, along with the way in which Loncraine skips around the text, cuts scenes, and adds small but important details to the aesthetics of Shakespeare’s play may mislead the audience and thus distract them from the original piece. Therefore, it is for this reason that although the 1995 movie adaptation of Richard III is, for the most part, a very enjoyable rendition of the play, the various modernizations to which Loncraine

The Evil King In Shakespeare's Richard Iii

2389 words - 10 pages The Evil King in Shakespeare's Richard III Richard is an actor, a fully evil actor, who through his mastery of the stage has come to appreciate his skill. Richard Moulton, in his Shakespeare as a Dramatic Thinker, proclaims Richard's wonder at his own command of the stage: "Richard has become an artist in evil: the natural emotions attending crime-whether of passionate longing, or horror and remorse-have given place to artistic

Glorifying The Tudor Dynasty: Shakespeare’s Richard Iii And The Perfect Villain.

1015 words - 5 pages flourished under the Queen. Playwrights ,such as William Shakespeare, were enthusiastic about this embrace of the arts and were encouraged to depict characteristics of Elizabethan society. Consequently, influences from the main cultural center encouraged and shaped plays such as Richard III. Historical influences are evident through Shakespeare’s plot, character of Richard III and the challenging of gender stereotypes, which result in the