This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Iran Nuclear Deal Essay

802 words - 4 pages

In the aftermath of the brand-new interim deal concerning Iran’s Nuclear Enrichment Program, the world is left in an awkward position. Do we applaud an unexpected step towards de-nuclearizing? Or do we remain skeptical of a barebones 6-month interim agreement? The truth is: both are somewhat true. For the first time since 2003, the international community, specifically the P5+1 (the U.S., France, Britain, Russia, China, and Germany), has successfully managed to strike a deal with the previously uncooperative and hard-lining Tehran. But at the same time, the agreement requires Iran to dilute enriched-uranium and stall development of centrifuges and reactor facilities for a mere 6 months. In return, the UN agrees to relieve certain sanctions on Iran’s petrochemical exports and allow access to previously frozen bank accounts. However, Iran’s side of the deal seems oddly imbalanced. With an estimated relief of only $7 billion to Iran’s economy (a tiny fraction of their GDP) and with the brutal sanctions on Iran’s oil still in play, it’s hard to imagine Tehran smiling over the deal. Therefore, the agreement must lead us to believe that the interim deal is not a groundbreaking symbol of peace nor is it a frail foreign policy framework. But rather, the conclusion of the November 24th discussion indicates a mild, but prospective shift in Middle Eastern politics—one that the US and certainly disadvantaged Iran must recognize.
So what’s changing? Are Iran and the Middle East finally thawing out from the Mediterranean Cold War? Probably not. However, with the election of reformist Hassan Rouhani in June of 2013 and the fateful telephone conversation on September 27, between US President Barack Obama and Rouhani (the first conversation between US and Iranian leaders in nearly three decades), Iran seems to be warming up to the US.
From the get-go, Rouhani appeared as a saving-grace after long years of hardline politics, serving as the Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council with a leading role in nuclear negotiations with the US, earning the nickname, “Diplomat Sheikh”. With a leader focused on opening discussion between political and economic rivals, Iran should pursue further dialogue and negotiations with P5+1 in order to lift the harmful economic sanctions.
That being said, at what point should/can the international...

Find Another Essay On Iran Nuclear Deal

Iran: A Policy to Eliminate the Nuclear Threat

1639 words - 7 pages negotiations with Iran until November of 2013; a concealed deal to alleviate the sanctions aimed at slowing Iran’s nuclear program had been underway for months between the Obama administration and Iran. The discussions were kept hidden, even from America’s closest allies and Congress. This is where the United States’ policy is flawed. The secrecy of these talks contribute to “tensions between the US and France…and with Israel, which is furious about the

The Iranian Nuclear Threat to Israeli National Security: Similar to Real Estate, It’s All About Location

1157 words - 5 pages States, and an interim deal was finally met after intensive talks in Geneva. Section 5: Lead up to the deal reached between Iran and the West The White House explained that the deal was a six-month deal that would include “substantial limitations that will help prevent Iran from creating a nuclear weapon.” The trade was that Iran would need to substantially slow down their nuclear development program, and the United States would lift some of

Should America attack Iran or stick with Diplomacy?

1283 words - 5 pages successors in Iran has claimed to have reasoned that if Iran and Israel were to have a nuclear war, Iran would lose less civilians compared to Israel. This lose wouldn't be a big a deal because there are much more Muslims global wide in comparison to the Jews (para.7). Now, after hearing such a bizarre factor from a leader that is building nuclear weapons, should Israel and the rest of the world just sit back and wait till these vague threats from

Nuclear Powers in Asia in Need of Disarmament

1728 words - 7 pages it has to destroy Israel. Along with severe consequences for Israel, the United States will also have major problems to deal with. The U.S. suspects that Iran's real goal is to use their newly achieved, enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon, so they have been demanding that Iran suspend their enrichment program (1). But this needs to happen with positive results as soon as possible before disastrous nuclear consequences happen first.More clearly

A Nuclear-Armed Iran

1749 words - 7 pages powerful way to stop Iran from developing its nuclear program. However, Posen does not dismiss the solution entirely, presenting a re-worked economic coercion solution. Posen presents that if the threat of international economic coercion is present but with a more diplomatic attitude. He specifies that the United States in particular should arrange a deal by offering a "security guarantee to end sanctions and the normalization of diplomatic relations

Engagement with Iran

1807 words - 8 pages an important tool with which to influence the behavior of consuming nations such as the U.S. As the Iranian economy continues to strain under mismanagement, the obsession for nuclear power, corruption, and crippling subsidies, the strategy of engagement provides incentives to build trade ties. The military and strategic threats Iran poses to the U.S. interests are serious and diverse. The threats will require determined efforts for engagement

Israel and Iran relations

2428 words - 10 pages Reading the media headlines today and spotting names of countries such as Israel and Iran one would expect the article to be on their disputes or their ongoing nuclear power conflict. Due to the many differences that countries have cultural, religious, political and economic have influenced their relationship in so many ways throughout the history. Going back to the initial establishment of a Jewish country in the Middle East in 1917 when the

US-Iran Relations

2195 words - 9 pages recommendations should be considered. • Recommendations I recommend the Obama’s administration to: • Make clear and crucial redlines of the nuclear ambitious of Iran in the nuclear deal which ensure preventing Iran to achieve a nuclear weapons. • Be aware of the danger of Iranian hegemonic ambitious even though a nuclear agreement has been achieved. • Keep the military option as a supportive tool and strengthen the allied conventional military

Iran's nuclear program

1835 words - 8 pages international community to achieve removal of these sanctions. Further understanding may be that their later re-imposition will be monumental task for the US and its allies. In view of advanced nuclear program of Iran, this option seems plausible. Iran may just try to deal with economic problems this way, fully aware of its progress on the way towards nuclear weapon and just sacrificing few months for the cause; - Other examples of failed

Relations Between Iran and US

2246 words - 9 pages maintains that it enriches uranium for the purposes of energy and medical research. Recently, however, following many talks between both sides, an agreement has been struck between Iran and the West, namely the P5+1: the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany. This deal states that Iran would retain its nuclear capabilities, but only for energy purposes. It stipulates that Iran would only enrich its uranium to 5%, the

Iran, Israel and The Security Council on Nuclear Power

668 words - 3 pages In the beginning of February 2014, the negotiations on the final deal of Iran’s nuclear program between Iran and P5+1 (the five permanent members of the Security Council – America, Britain, France, Russia and China – plus Germany) had begun (Blair, 2014). Iran has promised that it will temporarily stop the enrichment of nuclear plant during further six months, and six world powers, in turn, will lift the Iran’s sanctions (ibid). However, Israel

Similar Essays

The Iran Nuclear Deal Essay

2464 words - 10 pages ensure peace. What was thought that could never be done with a country that has had such negative and aggressive relations with the U.N., parts of the Middle East, and the Western world, has occurred through a deal that was signed off on November 23, 2013 with Iran, curbing their nuclear program nearly to a complete halt. This deal is seen through the eyes of the world as a historic moment as it has the potential to almost reverse all suspicion that

Israel And Iran's Incompatibility Essay

2430 words - 10 pages canceled by Russia in an attempt to further a deal with the United States at the time. The S-300VM that Russia plans on providing Iran will actually be a better system than the one originally agreed upon in 2010 (Chabin 2013, 8a). Russia’s involvement with Iran’s nuclear program has raised concerns for the West but in particular, Israel. Russia’s relations with Iran has Israel on the edge as it worries Iran will make a run at creating a nuclear

Iran's Nuclear Program Essay

2415 words - 10 pages I. Topic Description Iran’s Nuclear Program The Islamic Republic of Iran’s conquest for nuclear energy technology commenced during the 1950’s, inspired by U.S President Dwight Eisenhower’s program called “Atoms for Peace”. This program fabricated a plan in which the U.S Atomic Energy Commission would lend Iran as much as 13.2 pounds of low-enriched uranium in order to further develop their nuclear industries, including health care and

Hard Power On Iran Essay

894 words - 4 pages Gamble) This shows that Iran cannot be trusted to follow any diplomatic agreements. "No matter what interoperations are given, Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized," (FoxNews) said the Iranian president Rouhani after the resent nuclear deal was reached. This is perhaps one of the biggest arguments against the new deal, or any other deal that allows Iran to continue to run the nineteen thousand centrifuges that Iran currently operates