Is Animal Testing Wrong? Essay

785 words - 4 pages

Is animal testing wrong? Are scientists killing harmless creatures? In my opinion, I think that animal testing is completely out of order. Testing products on animal's can be fatal to the animals life. They are innocent species who have a life to live as do we humans, scientists pouring chemicals over them or injecting them with deadly substances is irrelevant considering everything we already have.

However without animal testing there would be fewer treatments for cancers and there would be less medication to help diabetes. Scientists claim that once they're tests are complete, the animals are put through a series of medication to get them back to full health.

On the other hand ...view middle of the document...

If the shampoo does harm them why do they need to suffer? An innocent animal is getting harmed from a product that they will not even use, is this acceptable? This still goes on throughout the United Kingdom, They way scientists can use animals has been controlled by legislation since as early as 1822 in Brittan and the law has grown much stricter since then. The animals act of 1986, for example, insists that no animal experiments be conducted if there were a realistic alternative.

The world does not need another eyeliner or shampoo or food ingrediant so deperately that we have to put innocent animals life's in danger. All the products that get tested on animals - there is already thousands of them out there that work perfectly fine and why should we need another cleaning product, would you not rather have another animals life on the planet instead of a surface spray? Testing is wasteful. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures by misleading experiments and squandering precious money, time and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research. The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animal's received tests for substances that will never actually see approval or public consumption and use....

Find Another Essay On Is Animal Testing Wrong?

Animal Testing: Right or Wrong? Jeremy Bentham

1365 words - 5 pages discover some cures, it is still unkind to do living conditions and the data can still be inaccurate and they are capable of advance their methods. We need to come together and help stop animal testing by forming groups that are against experimenting on animals and protest against companies that support animal testing. We need to call attention to the things companies do to animals to test their products and convince others that it is wrong to

A problem/solution essay on Animal Testing, and why it is wrong

903 words - 4 pages market (AMPEF). Animal testing is plainly unnecessary and downright cruel. Testing anything on animals, and putting them at harm, for this animal testing should be outlawed.If you think that animal testing is an effective way to give humans accurate results on whether a product will harm us or not, well think again. Practolol, a drug for heart disorders which passed animal testing was pulled off the shelves when the drug was found to cause blindness

Animal Testing - Necessary or Barbaric and Wrong? - Discursive Essay

1508 words - 6 pages vaccinations are available for dogs, and a cat flu vaccination is available too. Often, treatments are similar in animals and humans, therefore in some cases, their research benefits animals too.There is a lot of opposition to animal testing. Organisations such as PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals) exist in order to protect the lives of animals and to prevent animal testing from having to happen. Many people believe that it is morally wrong

Animal Testing is Animal Cruelty

1814 words - 7 pages has found these other testing methods for a reason, for saving the lives of innocent animals that are sometimes being slaughtered if the chemical reacts wrong, even the Humane Society of the United States is behind existing alternative testing methods. Careless scientists are still using the same testing dealing with animals just to save money. "Some animal tests haven't changed in 60 years," said Thomas Hartung, head of the European group. "The

Animal Testing- Is it Good?

2214 words - 9 pages Animal Testing and its ConsequencesAnimal research and testing actually began around 200 B.C. in Greece by Aristotle who was one of the first people to record experiments using animals (Cohen, 1984, p. 7). Since the days of Aristotle animals have been used through history for research and experimentation. According to a British journal, it is estimated that over 50 million animals are used for research each year (Hepple, 2002, p. 12). Most of

Animal Testing is Vital to Medical Advances

3050 words - 12 pages Research is responsible for virtually all the medical breakthroughs there have been- there are medicines and vaccines and cures and treatments and more life saving benefits being developed today- but an important factor to the development of medical advances is the inclusion of animals in research. Virtually almost everyone alive has benefited from the medical advances made feasible through animal testing. According to my aunt Blanca, who is a

Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessary

1675 words - 7 pages Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessaryIs it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments, because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on (People for the Ethical

Is Animal Testing Bad or Good?

1386 words - 6 pages Vaccines. Insulin. Makeup. Moisturizer. All of these have been developed, tested, and claimed safe for human use. How? Animal testing. Since nearly 500 BC, research and testing on living animals for human purpose has introduced hundreds of new medicinal and cosmetic advances for the human race. While some may see the advantages, others see the concept as just completely inhumane and unnecessary. Why is there such a big divide? The reason

Animal Testing: Who is the real beast?

1081 words - 4 pages Animal experimentation is a process involving the immoral and unethical treatment of animals in order to test the toxicity of a new product prior to its public release. The online biology dictionary describes it in the following manner: ‘’ Animal experimentation is the use of animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing and efficacy of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials.’’ (Biology

Animal testing is unethical and should be regulated

1255 words - 5 pages Animal testing is unethical and should be regulated.In the present era of science and technology, animals are used for experiments in various domains such as cosmetic testing, education, biomedical research and so on. Educational institutes from all over the world use animals in biomedical testing; cosmetic and genetic industries primarily use animals for different types of tests. Sarah Rose A. Miller, who wrote the prize-winning essay for the

Animal Testing is the Best Way to Test Products

1332 words - 5 pages 1. Introduction Thesis Statement: If animal testing were prohibited, then in what way would the effectiveness of a product be verified? A quote by Amanullah Ashraf states that, 'in order to gain something, we have to lose something '. According to this, I will be discussing animal testing. Audience: everybody who thinks animal testing should be prohibited. Purpose: convincing people that animal testing is the best way to test products and

Similar Essays

Animal Testing Is Wrong Essay

1801 words - 7 pages that most would agree that animal abuse is wrong. So, if animal abuse is wrong and animal testing can be, and usually is, much more painful and severe than animal abuse; why can’t people agree on the subject of animal testing? However, the argument for animal testing is also legitimate. Animal testing can help scientists find side effects, medicines, even cures. So, are the advantages of testing on animals worth the ethical issues it creates

Animal Testing: Is It Right Or Wrong?

1609 words - 7 pages Animal Testing- Is it Right or Wrong? Everyday, people all around the world use facial products, receive vaccinations and take antibiotics or medications that have been previously tested on animals. Rarely people think about whether or not animals have been tortured to use the products that they are using, but simply only think of themselves and their own well-being. “An estimated 26 million animals are used each year in the United States for

Needless Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation Is Wrong

964 words - 4 pages , and sometimes death, during lab experiments. No animal experiments can be justified. Animals have helped in some ways, such as the discovery of the polio vaccine. Vivisection can be defined as an invasive experiment performed on an animal for the purpose of scientific research, product testing or education ("The National. . ."). Vivisection is extremely wrong because it causes pain and suffering on animals. Animals are entitled to be free from

Animal Testing Wrong Or Right? Essay

2080 words - 8 pages procedures so as to lesson animal suffering".Reduction means to receive maximum information from fewer animals.Replacement means to use alternative methods other than testing on animals.Refinement means to minimize animal pain and suffering by using alternative methods.Animal research or otherwise know as animal testing is using non-human animals to do experiments on. Roughly there are 100 million animals used yearly and later destroyed in testing