Is Google Evil? Essay

1213 words - 5 pages

Google has proposed an agreement with representatives of authors and publishers to host a massive digital library. This library will consist of mostly books published in the United States. Google will make digitally available new and old books. This catalog will include books that are no longer in print and “orphan” texts (books where the copyright owner is unknown or contact information is unavailable).5 The texts will be available through search engines, for individual sale as electronic-books, and with database subscriptions. If the Google agreement is approved by the Justice Department, ethical issues would come into question. The issues addressed in this paper include whether the agreement creates a “legally sanctioned cartel for digital book rights”4 and if the public benefits outweigh the monopoly consequences. Google has the network, storage, man power and funding to make this digital library a possibility, yet is this justification enough to give one company so much concentrated power over information access?
Using the utilitarian approach, arguments both for and against the Google library agreement can be supported. First the audience should be established. Authors and publishers could be financially affected by this agreement. They are represented as a whole by the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers. Both groups are working together to ensure that writers are not
under compensated by Google and that publishing prices do not become too high. The Google company and its competitors are directly affected by the outcome of the agreement. Google will take on a huge expense in hopes to gain a reasonable profit. Competitors with equivalent capabilities, such as Microsoft and Amazon, have not expressed a vested interest in digitizing books as of yet. However, they would not want Google to be the only company legally allowed to do so in the future. An example of a smaller less capable competitor is the Internet Archive which is only concerned with the copy right of “orphan” books. The public is the largest group that will be affected. People will benefit tremendously from this digital catalog but could suffer in terms of privacy, cost and innovation if Google is the sole information access provider.
The public would benefit by having immediate access to numerous texts in almost every subject; libraries would no longer be limited to what can be stored on shelves. Researchers would be able to access information instantly, enabling them to work faster, smarter and more efficiently towards their goal. Arguably the most beneficial part of a digital library would be instant translation. Texts of all genres
could be read by millions of people who could not overcome the language barriers previously. Not only would translations of spoken language be possible but brail libraries could be expanded with a few key clicks.
Although Google is expected to share revenue with both publishers and authors, there is no provision in the...

Find Another Essay On Is Google Evil?

Corporate Social Responsibility: An Analysis of Google

2310 words - 9 pages consumers' interest behind (Stanton 2012). And several days ago, Google was reported it offered direct access of nude photos and sex tape for users and these private objects were several actresses', which showed out without permission (Glennie and Steere 2014).From these events happened above, it is obvious that Google abandoned his standard of "Don't Be Evil", appearing to be in league with the devil. The issue over copyright indicated Google not

fundamentals to business strategy Essay

992 words - 4 pages per Click system. This was introduced in the year of 2000. At present, Google is the most widely used search engine in the world and it has a market share of 54%. analysis:Political factors that affect Google:Mainly, the political factors have not affected the Google majorly. But, Google has faced some problems from the judiciary give up the archived terms that have been searched and

do it

3181 words - 13 pages leader among search engines . Ethical Value : “Don’t be evil"! is the Google’s informal corporate slogan suggested by Paul Buncheit who is the creator of Gmail, who dreamed that as he said “wanted something that, once you put it in there, would be hard to take out.” Google brand is a mathematical term "Googol", 1 followed by 100 zeros which is represents the unique vision of company to organize more data and information and money than investors

Business structure of Google

686 words - 3 pages employees that complement each other and show commitment to the company. Additionally, the ethical environment at Google generates the needed communication that is so valued. Because communication and risk taking are the objectives at Google, management concludes that it is focused on long term results. Moreover, that higher principles and statements such as "Don't be evil"(2005) control Google's ethics and values (Levy, S).Conversely, Google does

Internet Searches

2048 words - 8 pages . Google must be considered the heavy favorite as they seem to have the most momentum. Google is attacking the industry with fast innovation, a strong “do no evil” reputation, and very popular web based applications. However, Windows still has a huge advantage in operating systems and fully featured applications. The race will be one simply by the company that can provide the easiest and cheapest access to software that customers want to use

Background Information: Google Inc.

2307 words - 9 pages What is Google? Google is a website that has not only transformed the way we process endless information found on the internet, but it has also altered the way we think and talk about the internet. Google is a multinational company that specializes in public computing and internet search technology; it is utilized as a search engine to research documents, news, and using different applications. Since the startup of the company, Google has grown

Google marketing strategy

8748 words - 35 pages questions.It's been barely 13 years since conception but the search company whose slogan is "Don't be evil" (reputed to have been coined by the Google engineer Paul Buchheit in 2006 ) has now struck out into other technology areas beyond their core search business such as the successful Android mobile operating system which is reporting 400,000 activations per day (April 2011).Picasa photo organisationGoogle 'Earth' the 3D view of the earth

Google's Marketing strategy

8748 words - 35 pages questions.It's been barely 13 years since conception but the search company whose slogan is "Don't be evil" (reputed to have been coined by the Google engineer Paul Buchheit in 2006 ) has now struck out into other technology areas beyond their core search business such as the successful Android mobile operating system which is reporting 400,000 activations per day (April 2011).Picasa photo organisationGoogle 'Earth' the 3D view of the earth

Ethics of Google Glass: Spying through Social Media

1413 words - 6 pages /google-admits-google-glass-may-be-bad-for-your-eyes-1554141/ Madden, S. (2013, June 15). With wearable tech like Google Glass, human behavior is now a design problem. Retrieved from Gigaom: Schmitt, A. (2014, February 28). Be Evil: Driving While Using Google Glass Should Be Legal, Says Google. Retrieved from Street Blog USA. Walton, Z. (2013, 12 May). o The Privacy Implications Of Google Glass Scare You? Retrieved from WebProNews:

Company Motivation

3073 words - 12 pages did it come about. The word is actually a derivative of the word googol, which was first used by the Milton Sirotta. The word googol was also made popular a book authored by Edward Kasner and James Newman. The book is entitled "Mathematics and the Imagination". The word googol refers to the number represented by the numeral 1 continued by one hundred zeros. (Google, 2007) Google use the word to echoe the company's efforts to organize an extensive

Code of Ethics

922 words - 4 pages , and is more reliant on the judgment of its employees. For instance the phrase don’t be evil is explained as such, “It’s built around the recognition that everything we do in connection with our work at Google will be, and should be, measured against the highest possible standards of ethical business conduct” (Google, 2012). While the term evil is more closely associated with issues of morality, Google uses the term in connection with ethics

Similar Essays

Case Study: Google In China

906 words - 4 pages , people in almost every country can search the Internet for information about everything from historical facts to current events. Ingrained into the company's code of ethics is the often quoted phrase "don't be evil" (Hill, 2009, p. 148). By this, Google means the company will not compromise their Code of Conduct and will provide searchers with information which is current and not biased or censored in any way. To Google, their Code of Conduct is also

Google And The Government Of China

1745 words - 7 pages government. By compromising with the Chinese government, Google’s philosophy of “Don’t be evil” will be unavoidably damaged. Even though protecting the company’s image and its philosophy is definitely very important for Google, I think it is less important than failing to entering Chinese market and losing potential profit. All above factors give the Chinese government enormous bargaining power over the negotiation with Google. BATNA for China

What Should Google Do Next? Essay

948 words - 4 pages lead to diluting its business legacy - It might be a better choice for Google to maintain its focus on core search quality.Online advertising has generated substantial source of revenue but may affect the its interface. Google should strike a good balance and make a trade-off in further development.What should Google do next is a question to a lot of people. One thing is for certain: there is no one decision that could satisfy everyone. It is vital for Google to always keep its motto of not to be evil upon every decision making. This shall be the essence to a company's success. PAGE PAGE 1

Google Essay

1033 words - 5 pages manipulating business practices to avoid paying taxes which means they were breaking the law in this case, in Canada Google was ordered to pay a fine of five-hundred million for allowing Canadian pharmacies to advertise prescription drugs to U.S. residents, I don’t think Google follows it’s ethical practices very well because Google is evil in the eyes of many people around the world. Moreover every company is subject to a number of foreign