Is Targeted Killing Justified? Essay

1215 words - 5 pages

Definition of Targeted Killing:

In a report from May 2010, the United Nations General Assembly defined targeted killing as “premeditated acts of lethal force employed by states in times of peace or during armed conflict to eliminate specific individuals outside their custody.” The concept of targeted killing is not a new term; however, it has only recently entered the forefront of international relations in the post-9/11 world. Per the Council of Foreign Relations, the policy of targeted killing first gained worldwide recognition when the Israeli government admitted to targeting alleged Palestinian terrorists. Beginning in October 2001, the United States government under the George W. Bush administration began conducting targeted killings of suspected members of al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations throughout the Middle East. The actual method of targeted killing can range from special operations missions with boots on the ground to cruise missiles to drone strikes. In the United States, the primary method of targeted killing has been with drone strikes and has been focused on attacks in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Afghanistan.

The Legality of Targeted Killing:

Types of Targeted Killing:

Targeted attacks are predominantly done by either a drone strike or with a kill/capture mission. In a drone strike, a missile is launched from an unmanned aerial vehicle on a target in a foreign country. According to a study by the New American Foundation, President Obama has authorized four times as many drone strikes in his first four years in office as President Bush did in eight years. Given that a drone can be launched without the risk of American loss of life, it is easy to see why it is such a popular form of warfare and foreign policy. Like a high performance military aircraft, a drone contains state of the art stealth technology that makes it difficult to detect by enemy radar. Despite the decided advantages of drones, they are not without risk. Because a drone is unmanned, there is no pilot in the drone to take control if something goes wrong. While military personnel and operators on the ground have the ability to override the drone and take control in the event of an emergency, this is not a full proof strategy. According to the New American Foundation, drone strikes are on the rise with an estimated 291 attacks in Pakistan alone since 2009. Prior to 2013, the majority of drone attacks were conducted by the paramilitary arm of the Central Intelligence Agency. However, in an effort to promote transparency and openness about the program, the Department of Defense has begun to initiate many of the drone strikes.
In addition to drone strikes, the second method of targeted killings is kill/capture missions. Given the challenge in finding high value targets, the United States must rely on intelligence from foreign sources, analysts and operatives. These targets attempt to elude capture by only staying in one place for a short period of time or...

Find Another Essay On Is Targeted Killing Justified?

Ethical Issues: Targeting Killings Essay

1193 words - 5 pages Introduction: Targeted killings are killing of a suspect or member of a terrorist organization by having suspensions on them. However, the justification of targeted killing is the most vital and hard part since an individual is being killed without a proven guilt. There are numerous views on targeted killings some says it is a legitimate act to counterterrorism for pre-planned and pre-mediated terrorists acts or ‘’self-defense’’ while some

A Non-Pacifist Argument Against Capital Punishment

2756 words - 11 pages , however, that capital punishment is a similarly justifiable form of killing. The defense of capital punishment that I intend to attack is thus the one that proceeds by direct analogy to those forms of killing that are widely accepted as justified: self-defense and just war. Just as individuals and nations have a right to kill in self-defense, it is argued, so does society. Capital punishment is society’s version of self-defense. There are

Honor Killings in Our History

842 words - 4 pages statistics. In the older age group, the associated crimes usually include child abuse, incest, and marital stalking. These crimes are not associated with a culture nor are the young women targeted and the murders aren’t usually justified by the families. According to Chesler, ...these characteristics define the classic honor killing of younger women and girls” Ullah, 4 (Chesler, “Worldwide Trends in Honor Killings”). In the younger age group, females are “...killed by their families of origin eighty-one percent of the time” (Chesler, “Worldwide Trends in Honor Killings”).

Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? If So How? If Not, Why Not?

3205 words - 13 pages question he argues. He further notes that 'even if one were to grant that terrorism necessarily involves the killing of innocents, this alone does not place it beyond the scope of just war theory, for innocents may be killed in a just war. All the just war theory requires is that innocents not be targeted' .It is upon this discrimination principle that Lowe, in his article 'Terrorism and Just War Theory' argues that just war theory doesn't provide

Is America's War on Terrorism Justified within a Christian's World View?

1775 words - 8 pages both at the initiation of the global war on terror and at present. This begs the question; is America war on terror justified from the Christian perspective. In this paper, I contend that the war on terror is unjustified from a personal Christian perspective by highlighting various reasons as described hereafter. In order to determine the right response to terrorism, it is necessary that we establish what constitutes terrorism and who

Theory of War

1538 words - 6 pages . Some of the first known ideas that relate to the Theory of War date back to 400 BCE with the Mahabrarata, an Indian epic which doesn't directly establish war theory but lays down some of the principles of war theory in concern with how war should be conducted. In the epic there is a talk amongst a bunch of brothers who contemplate if war is ever justified. As discussion ensued they came to an agreement on certain things that would justify the

War: Unjustifiable and Absurd

1257 words - 5 pages War is a lot like love: it costs a lot of money, time, and energy; it distracts you from other areas of life; sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, but most importantly, in the end, it’s still worth fighting for. But unlike love, war cannot and should not be justified and disregarded, by gods or men. No matter what people try to do to resolve their disputes, sometimes they get so aggravated that they resort to killing each other, and the

Abortion: is it justified?

945 words - 4 pages right shall be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception." Therefore, abortion is not justified because we live by the principal of having a right. And by killing that foetus you are not respecting its rights. Abortion doesn't only concern the freedom of women, since personal freedom is controlled by the rights of others, in this case by the woman. We all have the opportunity and power to choose to live.Even though there are

Immorality of Assassinating Political Leaders

849 words - 4 pages choice to make because it goes against our legal system, and it leads to social and political chaos. Lastly, killing is never justified based on religious beliefs. First, one of the reasons many people believe that assassination is wrong, because it goes against our legal system. Abraham Lincoln survived many crises as our leader such as creating American goals and facing the worst war in U.S. history by ending slavery while the United States was

Discuss George's actions at the end of the novel. How can we justify what he does to Lennie? How can we condemn it?

827 words - 3 pages Discuss George's actions at the end of the novel. How can we justify what he does to Lennie? How can we condemn it?Although murder is morally incorrect, mercy killing can be justified as it may prevent a later inevitable and painful death. In the novella 'Of Mice and Men' written by John Steinbeck, the character George shoots his friend, Lennie. Whilst George's actions can be condemned, George had good intentions towards the death of his friend

terrorism and politics

2208 words - 9 pages extreme cases (3) by killing every male belonging to the group on behalf of which the terrorists operate (genocide). • How to Stop Terrorism: The only practically workable way to eradicate terrorism is to remove its cause – the (justified or unjustified) feeling of injustice. If the feeling of injustice is unjustified it can be removed by exposing the myth. If the feeling of injustice is justified then the only way to remove it is to redress that

Similar Essays

Targeted Killing: A Justified Act Essay

1426 words - 6 pages Extrajudicial killings, or targeted killings as it is sometimes called, is the “deliberate, specific targeting and killing, by a government or its agents, of a supposed terrorist or of a supposed ‘unlawful combatant’ (i.e., one taking a direct part in hostilities in the context of an armed conflict) who is not in that government's custody” (“Targeted Killing”, Wikipedia). For years, targeted killings have been an integral part of modern warfare

Targeted Killings In The Fight Against Terrorism

1485 words - 6 pages conduct the targeted killing. Georgetown University’s Jonathan Turley criticized this interpretation of the constitution “’as the very definition of authoritarian power’” At the very least, this liberal definition of “due process” is a compromise of democratic principles for ensuring security. However, both American and Israeli citizens have made it clear they are willing to make concessions on democratic principles for a perceived sense of

The Legitimacy Of U.S. Drone Strikes

1899 words - 8 pages Langley, Virginia) to assassinate Al-Qaeda militants is wildly unpopular, with only 9% of Pakistanis supporting it” (Shaw, 2012, 1491). Since the purpose of the drone strikes is to neutralize Al-Qaeda and Taliban members and leaders by using targeted killing, many have doubted its legitimacy under the international law and jus ad bellum. Despite the fact that the definition of targeted killing is not agreed under the international law, a UN

Pre Emptive Force According To Michael Walzer

1835 words - 8 pages allow a state to respond to an attack once the targeted state had seen it coming but before it felt its impact. Pre-emption is then like a reflex “a throwing up of ones arms at the very last minute” (Walzer, 2006: 75). Putting aside the definitions of pre-emptive war, the question of whether or not it is justified has become a complex and contradictory matter for many states. The issues of abiding by international law, understanding the meaning