This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Is The Current Law Defense Of Insanity Ineffective?

2143 words - 9 pages

INTRODUCTION
In this project, I will consider whether the current law defence of insanity is ineffective, out-dated and in need of reform. I will do so by considering few criticisms of the insanity defence under the M’Naghten rules by academics like Peter Blood and others, as well as by reviewing possible law reform in the Insanity and automatism Scoping paper.
My main aim is to uncover particular parts of the law which urgently need a reform such as sleepwalking, diabetes and the distinction between external and internal factors, by comparism of the contrasting leading cases. I would also like to point out to the legal definition of insanity and to the out-dated M’Naghten rules (test). ...view middle of the document...

This means that the insanity defence is weak and in need of reform.
According to Smith and Hogan, Criminal Law, 1992, p207, the M'Naghten Rules have been subjected to criticism mainly by doctors, but also by lawyers. The Rules are based on old psychological views and they are concerned only with defects of reason and take no account of emotional or volitional factors. The language is old and very difficult to understand and interpret.
THE M’NAGHTEN RULES
On January 20, 1843 Daniel M’Naghten tried to kill Sir Rober Peel, but shot his secretary instead, while suffering from morbid delusions. The court established that he was suffering from disease of the mind and he did not know his action.
The House of Lords indicated that:
D must prove that he was suffering from a ‘defect of reason‘ (Clarke 1972) caused by a ‘disease of the mind’ (Kemp 1957, Bratty 1963, Sullivan 1984) and that D must not know what he was doing or that it was wrong (Windle 1952,Johnson 2007).

Academic As Ashworth notes
Lord Diplock explained the ‘disease of the mind‘ in the case of Sullivan: Is not clear that the word ‘wrong‘ interpreted to mean morally or legally wrong. Lord Devlin stated: There is an issue of whether the D knew that his action was morally wrong. In Sutcliffe , D suffered from schizophrenia, but he had a knowledge that his actions were against the law and therefore was held not to be insane. This shows that this is not a satisfactory test for criminal responsibility and surely not in the public interest.
Today, the rules set out in this case face many criticisms. Some academics have argued that even if the D meet the legal definition of insanity and do not meet the medical criteria for insanity, is sentenced to medical care anyway. Another criticism is that the rules are not able to distinguish if the D is dangerous for the public or not or if the D is suffering from temporary or permanent mental condition. Additionally, some academics have argued that this rule makes it too easy for a D with a severe mental disorder to avoid criminal responsibility for any crimes committed.
Dr Winstanley challenged this defence in the House of Commons debate in 1967: And Lord Bramwell said that
THE WIDE SCOPE OF ‘DISEASE OF THE MIND‘
This is contrary to the Mental Health Act 2003, because the concept of ‘disease of the mind‘ is not compatible with the definition of the ‘mental disorder‘ under the MHA 2003. MHA 2003 is trying to mitigate treatment of mental disorder, while the aim of defence of insanity is to excuse mentally ill people from criminal liability.
In R v Kemp (1957) , D hit his wife with a hammer while suffering from arteriosclerosis. The court established that hardening of the arteries was a temporary or a permanent defect of the mind and was therefore a ‘disease of the mind‘ and also that it does not distinguish between diseases of the mind and body so it prevents the phrase ‘defect of reason.‘
Devlin J held:
In this case was established that the law...

Find Another Essay On Is The Current Law Defense of Insanity Ineffective?

The Insanity Defense Essay

1377 words - 6 pages The first claim of the insanity defense recorded can be found in Hammurabi’s code which dates back to around 1772 BC. The Code of Hammurabi is a Babylonian law code of ancient Iraq, formerly Mesopotamia. Back when the Roman Empire ruled the government found convicted people to be non-compos mentis. This means without mastery of mind and not guilty for their criminal actions. There have been many different types of test over the years to

The Insanity Defense Part I When is the insanity plea a reasonable and

866 words - 3 pages severe. This (Insanity Defense) is an endeavor to place in morality into our so called perfect law because there is no perfect test to know if the acclaimed criminal is insane or not. Contrary to what a few people who have lost their loved ones through the act of an insane person, and most people who oppose the insanity plea say, a person who commits a crime and at the time the crime was committed he was not in his correct sate of mind and cannot

The Law of Self-defense

993 words - 4 pages The Law of Self-defense We concur with Justice White's interpretation of Tennessee State law. However, we propose that more restrictive standards should be used by policemen when dealing with imminently dangerous circumstances. The necessity standard that White proposes for governing the use of lethal force strikes the right balance in regulating violence. He insists that the police act reasonably by evaluating whether the felon's

Andrea Yates and The Evolution of Insanity Defense

1919 words - 8 pages wife’s condition. By reason of doctors saying that Andrea Yates was getting better, Rusty had the right to believe that his wife was truly getting better and also that if he treated her like she was insane, the end result would be the same. The M’Naughten Rule states, “Every man is to be presumed to be sane, and ... that to establish a defense on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the

The Insanity Defense, "Innocent by Reason of Insanity", Should be Reformed or Abolished

1909 words - 8 pages similar principles, the procedures and criteria used for a finding of insanity vary. The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law developed guidelines for current practices. According to a review in the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, about one third of the states adopted regulations for the insanity defense modeled after a 1950 law that holds that a person would "not be responsible for criminal conduct if at the time

Insanity Defense: Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI)

2964 words - 12 pages properly tried in the court of law, the United States Government should abolish the long standing “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” defense and establish the “Guilty but Mentally Ill” verdict nation wide. Research Insanity Defense The Insanity Defense is considered one of the most controversial defenses in the United States Court System, and due to that fact, the insanity defense is used in only 1% of criminal cases. Of the 1% of

The Hinckley Trial and the Insanity Defense

1237 words - 5 pages , and medications. (Dan Greenberg, Psychiatric Treatments) The John Hinckley Trail was an assassination crime towards the president Ronald Reagan of the United States of America. The prosecution raised a defense against the defendant saying he was full aware of his actions and should be tried guilty for the murder of the president. The defendant stated not guilty by claim of insanity. Hinckley had an interest in famous crimes, and he studied

The Insanity Defense: Crazy or Not?

687 words - 3 pages like "Law and Order" are more responsible for shaping the public's opinion about legal dilemmas such as the insanity defense than factual court cases. This may skew public opinion, but in many ways the same questions are to be asked.Many people, such as the one of the victims of the Unibomber's actions, believe that regardless of one's state of mind, one should be judged and punished based on the actions taken. Even a person who is "mentally ill

Answers whether the insanity defense has a useful fuinction

1162 words - 5 pages necessary to the total order is naive and unfounded.In my opinion the insanity defense is impossible to maintain on the basis of rules such as the M'Naghten Rule, and the relationship between law and psychiatry must be reestablished on a more scientific level, based on the neurological work now going on in the brain sciences.

The Transportation Security Administration is Ineffective

868 words - 4 pages . However, the expensive machines are ineffective. In 2010, TV personality Adam Savage unintentionally managed to get two 12" long razor blades through security[1]. In 2011, an undercover TSA agent was able to successfully pass through the scanners with a handgun in her underwear, repeatedly[2]. The TSA is clearly incapable of creating a truly safe airport checkpoint, and is becoming less effective the longer time goes on -- and the larger their

The Insanity of Hamlet

1592 words - 7 pages In the play Hamlet written by William Shakespeare the reader gets to see how Hamlet's life pertains to his insanity. “In life of Hamlet as represented by Shakespeare we have a full history of a case of insanity, of a peculiar kind” (Kellogg). “It is sometimes an appropriate response to reality to go insane” notes Philip K. Dick. Even though Hamlet is aware in the play there is a side to Hamlet that takes control of him. Though Hamlet often

Similar Essays

Defense Of The Insanity Defense Essay

2558 words - 10 pages defense in a court of law is another area that needs improvement. Many who oppose the insanity defense think that a jury of peers cannot impartially convict those with mental illnesses. There is a level of truth in this concept, most jury members are not psychologists and do not have a lot of information on mental illness, much less an understanding on the level needed to fairly decide someone else’s fate. An inadequate education of the jury can

Against The Insanity Defense Essay

1238 words - 5 pages The insanity defense has been used for decades to justify the crimes of those individuals found to be not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI). The use of the insanity defense is one that is surrounded in controversy and continues to be a problem for medical and law professionals across the nation. One major problem with the insanity defense is that insanity is a legal, not a medical definition. So how can one apply medical theory to a legal

The Insanity Defense Essay

1170 words - 5 pages Each state, and the District of Columbia, has its own statute outlining the standard for determining whether a defendant is legally insane, therefore not responsible, at the time the crime is committed. “An insanity defense is based on the theory that most people can choose to follow the law; but a few select persons cannot be held accountable because mental disease or disability deprives them of the ability to make a rational / voluntary

The Insanity Defense Essay

2225 words - 9 pages known what they were doing at the time or not have realized their actions were wrong. (Insanity defense among the states ) Despite the fact that people plead insanity it is not confirmed they will be granted that permission and there is no possible way to prove that they were actually insane at the time, the insanity defense is needed because it is a right that we are entitled to use and some people really were not aware of what they were doing so