This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Is The Testing Of Products On Animals Humane?

2416 words - 10 pages

The ethics of animal testing has been debated about since the late 1800s. Human beings feel that they are superior to animals because of the animals’ incapability of reasoning or eloquently expressing themselves like humans can. Animal testing dates as far back as ancient Greek and Roman colonies when people would dissect animals for pure curiosity and the acquirement of knowledge. Vivisections, the act of operating on live animals, occurred later on. Realdo Colombo was infamous for performing vivisection on pregnant dogs. He would take out a fetus from the dog’s womb and torment her young offspring in front of her. Despite the pain the mother dog experienced, she would bark furiously and ...view middle of the document...

“…We can empathize directly with [these] fellow humans. Being more certain of their suffering than that of any animal, we would be remiss in not putting [our ]fellow humans first by doing research that might eventually help someone. To lack such empathy…is inhuman and inhumane" (Haugen).
One well-known instance of cruelty towards the animal being tested upon was the Silver Spring Monkey Case. In 1981, Alex Pacheco was hired by Edward Taub to assist in an experiment. Pacheco was part of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals organization (P.E.T.A), and furtively disguised himself to expose the atrocious acts Taub had done to the monkeys. Taub’s research involved depriving the monkeys of their senses. This was perpetrated by ingesting chemicals into their spinal cords that inactivated the nerves in their arms. Biting and gnawing on their own arms, the monkey produced severe lacerations when trying to gain back their senses. Pacheco photographed the conditions that the monkeys endured and how they were treated. Later, Taub was charged with animal cruelty, and the monkeys were confiscated from the experiment. Questions regarding the common decency and overall nature of tested animals arouse after this incident.
Laboratory animals tolerate numerous tests in cruel living circumstances and endure severe agony. Researchers are unable to administer the animals with anesthetics or pain relievers in case it interacts with the tested remedy. The animals have to bear through the impacts of the product, and can do nothing about their condition (About Animal Testing). The treatment of laboratory animals is atrocious and merciless. Animals are often force-fed, are deprived of food and water, purposely burned and wounded, and physically restrained. They are also exterminated through decapitation, carbon dioxide asphyxiation, and ingest harmful substances in their bodies. A common assessment used by cosmetics companies to evaluate irritation of products such as shampoo is the “Draize Eye Test.” In this analysis, rabbits are incapacitated in stocks with their eyelids held opened by clips for multiple days. They are unable to blink away the tested merchandise and later are examined for the reaction of the product on the eyes. Another habitually used trial for pesticide quantity is Lethal Dosage 50 (LD50). An LD50 is a standard measurement of toxicity stated in milligrams of pesticide per kilogram of body weight. It represents the individual dose needed to eliminate fifty percent of a test animal population. The lower the amount, the more lethal the pesticide. Animals are tested with this through means of inhalation, consumed with food or water, and applied on skin (Ag 101). A dosage of LD50 has the capability of killing fifty percent of the laboratory animal population while evaluating the pesticide (Animal Testing). Improvements in living conditions and pain reduction will benefit the animals and environment.
The agony that animals experience is...

Find Another Essay On Is the Testing of Products on Animals Humane?

Animal Testing is Necessary, but Should All Testing of Pharmaceuticals be Carried Out on Animals?

931 words - 4 pages considered. Others believe animal testing is essential to find if certain drugs are harmful to humans. Biology Animal testing involves testing pharmaceutical drugs on animals in order to see the effectiveness and side effects of the drug. This is usually carried out by inhaling, inserting or placing the drug on the animal’s skin. Two regular tests conducted are the LD50 test and Draize test. LD50 is a common animal test which stands for the

Testing Drugs On Animals Essay

755 words - 3 pages Why are animals used as test subjects of medications that the human race will eventually rely on? The answer lies in all the advances that have arisen due to the ongoing testing. From these tests we have created cures for many diseases. However, these tests tend to be very unreliable in some areas. When testing Penicillin if we had just tested it in Guinea Pigs we most likely would have declared it a toxic drug.Medical testing on animals has

Medical Testing on Animals

697 words - 3 pages strikes a person every 45 seconds.The Centers for Disease Control estimate that 70-80% of the commondiseases killing Americans are preventable given a responsible dietand lifestyle. Drug testing on animals is inaccurate and does notbenefit humans or animals at all. Animals including, but not limitedto, dogs, cats, mice, rats, guinea pigs, hamsters, gerbils, rhesusmonkeys, imported primates, owls, deer, sheep, llama, and cattle arecommonly used for

Genetic testing on animals

2111 words - 8 pages the public. It is true that scientists are constantly testing new drugs every day, and are always trying to find a cure for diseases. Now, if a scientist discovers or makes a cure for cancer, and it is tested and approved, then is it not in their moral obligation to promote and provide this drug for the public? Scientists are what the public depends on to help them out. So when something is discovered or prepared it is in the duty of the

Animal Testing is the Best Way to Test Products

1332 words - 5 pages effect that would result if testing on other group of cells. There are many other approaches such as stem cell technologies and tissue engineering that show agreement for substituting animals in certain areas of investigation. There is the cell cultures method also, where it often gives limited information about what occurs in a living animal. Due to all those failures that had occurred replacing animal testing around 500 leading UK scientists and

Animal Testing and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals

1307 words - 5 pages Everyday people are using products not knowing who, what, where, why or how these products are being made from. Many companies are neglecting the use of animal experimentation by the fact that there are alternative ways to test their products without testing them on animals. If alternative methods have been discovered that are more humane and effective, why aren’t companies using them? By using alternative methods to animal testing, products and

Testing on Animals: Wrong or Right

1483 words - 6 pages the realization that animals had feelings and could most definitely feel pain, people have started debating over the issue of animal testing, and it has became a highly controversial topic and highly talked about topic. Many people argue, in particular animal rights groups such as PETA that it is downright immoral to test products of any kind on animals, while scientists believes that animal testing and experimentation has become without a doubt

should testing been done on animals?

704 words - 3 pages . Firstly, Animal testing should be banned because Animals are dying painful and torturous deaths. According to humane research Australia 928,217 mouses were used for animal testing in 2011, 331,952 of theses mouses were tested on in New South Wales. 1,139,136 domestics fowls were used in animal testing in Australia, 106,849 of these domestic fowls were tested on in New South Wales. One of the animal tests that are used is the Eye and Skin

The Rhetorical Analysis of “Is more humane to kill stray cats, or let them fend alone?”

757 words - 4 pages Lisa Lednicer writes “Is it more humane to kill stray cats, or let them fend alone?” which offers several opposing views on whether cats should be euthanized or set free with minor changes done to them. She argues both sides in the article being unbiased throughout and only being supportive with factual evidence throughout the article. Lednicer appeals logically and emotionally by giving personal stories and facts throughout the article without

Medical Testing on Prisoners, Not Animals

2558 words - 10 pages should be used in the place of animals for the advancement of medical history. There have been multiple cases and stories where prisoners have been abused through medical research, which the reader will realize as this paper is being read. All of these incidents with the prisoners are not as nearly graphic or inhuman as animal testing. Animal testing is cruel, they have no choice, whereas prisoners would have a choice. Prisoners on death row should

Animal Testing and Mistreatment of Animals

687 words - 3 pages what your stance may be on animal testing, it is important that we not permit the mistreatment or neglect of care for animals. Mistreatment of animals can lead to hefty fines and even imprisonment. Some people would argue that animals are different from humans, which make animal test results irrelevant. PR Newswire states that, “Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans, and mice are 98% genetically similar to humans. The United States and

Similar Essays

Humane Treatment Of Animals Essay

1425 words - 6 pages Humane Treatment of Animals Animal testing is a necessity in today's society. This topic receives a lot of attention worldwide. There are many people who feel that risking an animals well being is cruel and inhumane. They may be right; however, I'm taking a utilitarian approach on this topic and saying that the greater good for majority of people wins. At this day in age we cannot simply stop testing animals until another way is discovered

The Rights Of Testing On Animals

1190 words - 5 pages Animal testing can harm many different species of animals for our selfish needs of being safe and no harm coming to humans. Many animals are at risk when scientists test on them for products animals do not have the necessary need for them. Health problems, testing, alternatives and student surveys, and rebuttal make testing very wrong in every point of view. An animal’s daily life in a testing room is very stressful and life risking every

The Controversy Of Testing On Animals

1187 words - 5 pages testing for cosmetics, and alternative testing methods are generally available and lead to more reliable results. This is an upsetting topic but everyone should be aware of animals being used when purchasing a product. Some products say – no animal testing involved in its development. Product testing is commonly performed on animals in order to measure the effects of the substances used in the making of cosmetics. In performing these tests

Cosmetic Testing On Animals, Is It Necessary?

647 words - 3 pages . Those scientists that are for cosmetic testing though say it does not harm the animal, and that it is a necessity to do the testing, so they can find the chemicals in cosmetics and try to find a way to prevent those chemicals from harming people. Testing on animals so people can look pretty is outlandish considering the many different types of animals used to do the research, the risks to the animals, and the amount of money tax payers pay. “Many