This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Is American Foreign Policy In The Middle East From 1945 2003 Driven By Their Desire For Oil?

2223 words - 9 pages

It was the Americans have called the Berber areas of the Mediterranean Sea the "Middle East" for the first time. And it if this region that became bound the United States- from its revolutionary origins to their strange relationship based on fascination, confrontations and complex collaboration.
When at the end of 1914, British soldiers were protecting Iraqi oil supplies from Persia, the United States of American had little interest in the Middle Eastern resources or any imperial designs in the region. They were focused on Latin American, the Caribbean, East Asia and the Pacific. That changed in 1928 and again in 1944 when the Americans signed the Red Line Agreement and the Anglo—American Petroleum Agreement. And after World War II the US minor involvement was strengthening its roots, starting with Truman solidifying the US presence in Iran and taking the lead away from the Soviet Union. “It was understood that Middle East oil resources are critical for world control. One leading planner pointed out that control over Middle East oil would yield substantial control over the world. France was expelled from the region, the British were gradually reduced to a junior partner, and the US emerged as the dominant force in controlling Middle East oil and, therefore, it was hoped, the world.” Finally the US understood what is really important in the Persian Gulf region: oil. But this realization not only pushed toward a pursuit for power and influence but it also led to many conflicts and unanswered questions in the Middle East.
Oil gave and gives immense wealth, but is has often proved to be a curse to the country that possesses it. This has been the case so often that economists began to discuss the curse of this natural resource- the oil curse. It is no wonder that this curse had attracted the eyes of the United States of America. On January 1991, Senator Ernest Hollings stated that George W. Bush has acted in times of crisis in Kuwait because of the need to protect American oil interests there and that he will not take action in any other regions of ‘naked aggression’ such as Lithuania because “Lithuania does not have oil”. This essay will try to elucidate and analyze if in fact it is accurate to assume that American foreign policy became shaped by its dependence on imported oil and thus not by the idea of spreading democratic ideology in the Middle East region. This essay will look into causes and assumptions of why the Iraq invasion by the US took place. It will also examine America’s shifting relationship with Saudi Arabia and growing connection with Israel that damaged the relations with Iran.

The Iraq War: simple thirst for oil?
On March 20th, 2003, eleven years ago, American planes and ground units attacked Iraq in "Operation Iraqi Freedom". Fast forward eleven years since that landmark event and it is safe to say that this operation was a strategic failure of Washington and a huge blow to its policy of democratization in the Middle East....

Find Another Essay On Is American Foreign Policy in the Middle East from 1945-2003 Driven by Their Desire for Oil?

Strategic importance of the oil resources in the Middle East for the world superpowers (USA, GB) after the WWII

636 words - 3 pages forced to seek for new sources of this commodity abroad, usually in their colonies and occupied territories. USA has been the greatest consumer as well as producer of the oil products and at the same time were the most active in seeking for new overseas sources. The Great Britain, as the third biggest industrial and marine superpower by that time, was fully dependent on the imports from its colonies, mainly from the Middle East. In 1945 American

U.S. Foreign Policy Since 1945 Essay

2152 words - 9 pages often led to policy failure. This blindness of national leaders in Washington is a core of Bacevich’s argument and a viewpoint with which I agree. The “sacred trinity” is an idea of American military policy that Bacevich argues has been followed for decades by policy makers The U.S. must maintain a global military presence, configure forces for global power projection, and counter existing or anticipated threats with global intervention

HItler's foreign policy between 1933 and 1945

537 words - 2 pages Hitler had achieved power and control over Germany in 1933 and by 1935, he had secured the Nazis power base. Foreign policy, as goring said in his trial in 1945 was Hitler's very own realm. All foreign policy decisions and initiatives were that of Hitler himself. Hitler's aim was to restore Germany to a powerful nation as it once was. His foreign policy was racial & national and intended to deliberately expand Germany at the expense of

Peace in the Middle East: Jumpstarting the Process This was written in Feb 2003 for a International Relations course. What the US should do to make progress in the Israeli/Palestinian problem

1321 words - 5 pages the one-sided policy has only emboldened Israel's extremists, while weakening the peace movement (Congressional Quarterly). Whether or not the alliance significantly hampers the process is a largely argued debate. Nevertheless, America must make the best of their situation, focusing on its strengths. With the sole power's support, Israel can be persuaded to go to great lengths for peace, such as a withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza territories

East Timor: A Betrayed People Fight for Freedom - Australian Foreign Policy

1883 words - 8 pages the UN had ever seen (Marker, J, 2003). In the wake of these tumultuous events emerged the tiny new nation of East Timor.Australia's foreign policy, dictated by self-interest jeopardized the welfare and lives of the East Timorese people for over 30 years of brutal Indonesian occupation. The Indonesian invasion, based on the fear of communism, deprived East Timorese their freedoms while allowing the Australian government to strengthen their

The Differences of Gladstone And Disraeli In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire and Foreign Policy

3349 words - 13 pages The Differences of Gladstone And Disraeli In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire and Foreign Policy Gladstone and Disraeli generally had very different policies regarding the British Empire and foreign policy. Disraeli tended to shape his policies in regards to what is in the best interests of Britain and her empire. Gladstone was a man who followed his principles and Christian ethics; his foreign policy was an

Ancient Egypt, the Nile River, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and their relationship

916 words - 4 pages look carefully at the stars. Their priest-astronomers developed the first 365-day calendar; there were 12 months, three seasons (the Nile flooding season, the planting season, and the harvest season), each month had 30 days and the last month had 5 extra days. The problem with their calendar is that they did not account for leap years, later on the Middle East countries passed this on to the Romans who modified this calendar to the one that we use today.

McSnoop: Franchising the War Against Global Terror. As long as Muslim dictators throughout the oil-rich Middle East continue to buy off imams who

4467 words - 18 pages McSnoop: Franchising the War Against Global Terror. As long as Muslim dictators throughout the oil-rich Middle East continue to buy off imams who teach conspiracy theories and violence against non-Muslims, and the emergence of homegrown terrorist groups in the West is left unchecked, there is little hope for a secure future. Without a vast reformation movement within Islam, their religiosocial system will continue to flourish, which is why the

Evaluate the containment policy in Europe from 1945-1950

520 words - 3 pages in May 1949. This event was successful in keeping West Berlin non-communist as it resulted in the creation of the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic, separating East and West Germany, and Communism did not spread beyond these borders.From these aspects one can assess that the US generally had some success in their foreign policy of containment, but is limited to Western Europe. From 1945 to 1949, the USSR gradually took over seven Eastern European countries without any confrontation from the US. When the US did confront the Soviet Union, though, as in the Berlin Crisis, the outcome was a favourable success.

American Foreign Policy in Syria

1472 words - 6 pages , by forming an alliance that assembles all U.S. partners to implement a no-fly zone. On the other hand, a U.S. military intervention is unlikely to happen since the U.S. cannot afford, politically or economically, an unsecured contribution to the Syrian war for an unpredictable period of time, especially after Obama’s foreign policy has been focused on ending all military involvements in Iraq and Afghanistan. The U.S. army hasn’t seemed to rest

The title of my essay is Proactive American Foreign Policy

688 words - 3 pages for their own preemptions. We need to discredit this flawed policy, which is without root in American history or values. Force should used in self- defense, not in response to a hypothetical threat that could one day threaten us.History is filled with several instances to support why the United States should pursue a proactive foreign policy. One example is the Korean War, which was a joint venture of several nations under the guide of the U.N. to

Similar Essays

Is American Foreign Policy In The Middle East From 1945 2003 Driven By Their Desire For Oil?

2585 words - 11 pages focus of US foreign policy in the Middle East, they did pay a lot of special attention to the policies of the Israeli government, which was as well driven by the desire for oil from Iran after 2003. All in all, “The US bias towards Israel and hostility towards ‘uncooperative’ regimes such as that in Iraq have played into the hands of militant Islamists who use such events to weaken the popular support of more moderate regimes in the region. As a

The Detriment Of Us Foreign Policy In The Middle East

2939 words - 12 pages fervent in their backing of Israel (John& Stephen 2007 p47). The Middle East is important to the US because the survival of Israel is important to the US, a survival that has often been put at risk."American foreign policy was and continues to be Israeli policy. Israel was not threatened with even a cut-off of U.S. aid as thousands of Lebanese civilians died from the Israeli actions. Iraq was once a friend of America with whom we bought oil and

American Foreign Policy 1945 2005 Essay

1060 words - 4 pages superiority over the USSR and in the Western Hemisphere as a whole. American foreign policy in the Gulf War was also successful. President Bush and his government handled this conflict universally, creating a coalition with the support of the U.N. against Saddam Hussein's invasion on Kuwait. Working with an international coalition to liberate Kuwait and protect much of the world's supply of oil allowed the U.S. to look good internationally

Oil Boom In The Middle East

2090 words - 8 pages security and stability. “The past 50 years have witnessed three major wars between oil producing countries, most notably the Iran-Iraq war which resulted in over 1.5 million casualties.” It is clear that the wealth that some Middle Eastern states have acquired from their oil has certainly not provided for economic or political development or security to the Middle East, thus it can be concluded that oil wealth cannot in any significant sense be