Jeffersonian Republicans Are Usually Characterized As Strict Constructionists Who Were Opposed To The Broad Constructionism Of The Federalists. Assess The Validity.

643 words - 3 pages

Between 1801 and 1817, the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted, or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs, but however, as time went on, they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists, who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction, adopted a more strict interpretation. Whenever the members of these parties had to change their perspective in order to suit their needs, they seemed to have no qualms in doing so.Before Jefferson's own presidency, he was a large advocator of strict constitutionalism. In 1800, he wrote a letter to Gideon Granger, telling him that he believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution. He is a large advocator of state rights, and he states that he is not in favor of a strong national government. In the end of this letter, Jefferson states that "the true theory of the constitution is surely the wisest and best". (Document A)In 1808, Jefferson follows the same view. In his letter to Samuel Miller, he strictly interprets the constitution as being the ultimate authority, and leaving the states the power that the government can not harness, such as anything to do with religious affairs. Before Jefferson's presidency and real call to power, Jefferson's favor of strict constitutionalism remained. (Document B)But, that all changed once Jefferson was president. His advocacy of a strict interpretation of the Constitution was out of the picture. In his first term of his presidency, he committed two acts which were not appropriate for a man with a strict perspective of the Constitution. These two acts were sending armed forces in order to battle the Barbary Pirates, to end paying ransom to them. Although this action was one of Jefferson's more successful actions, Jefferson did not consult Congress before taking...

Find Another Essay On Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. Assess the validity.

Comparing the Federalists and Republicans Essay

928 words - 4 pages evil, limited government's power, and wanted to build an agrarian society where liberty and equality are ensured. However, even though Republicans insisted a strict interpretation of the Constitution, both presidents were "Federalized" and loosened their interpretation in practice, and eventually adopted Hamilton's ideas to protect national economy.

Were the Federalists Democratic? Essay

1256 words - 5 pages Were the Federalists Democratic? The idea of democracy is both vague and is often over-simplified to mean "majority rules". In theory, such a notion sounds both just and efficient. However, in practice, the concept of "majority rules" is much more complex and often difficult to implement. Modern-day versions of democracy, such as the one utilized in the United States, simply guarantees a person's right to voice his or her opinion in all

Political Party System: The Federalists vs. the Republicans

1550 words - 6 pages the differences in their viewpoints. Political parties came into existence. Composed of two parties, the Federalists and the Republicans, they took turns to govern the country with their own ideas and principles. They shared different ideas on many aspects and opposed every move the opponent made. As the Constitution of 1787 was introduced, two political parties were present in Congress. One of them was the Federalists and the other was the

The Majority Of Texas Voters Are Republicans

653 words - 3 pages , Republican Bob Dole received 48.8% of the votes in Texas while Democrat Bill Clinton received 43.9% of the votes. This was obviously a very close race. And, since Democrats statistically are less likely to vote than Republicans, it may even indicate that there are more (or at least as many) Democrats in Texas as Republicans. Or perhaps it is just that Texas Independents favored Clinton over Dole.The 2000 Election however was not nearly as close

"To a great extent the Constitution is a document with as many checks upon the power of the people and majority rule as upon the power of the government." Assess the validity of this statement.

745 words - 3 pages roam freely, doing whatever they wish. American people are not even allowed to vote directly for president. The Electoral College, an establishment created by the founding fathers of the constitution checks the people's right to vote. Although Americans' direct vote is directly related to the election of the president, it is not the final say in who will win the election.For both the people and the government, power is checked and balanced. As Lord

Discuss the extent to which you think that goals are determined by the overarching culture of a society as opposed to smaller social groups or subcultures

1106 words - 4 pages Pascal Cisangani 23023554 / 23345853 Danai MuswaziDiscuss the extent to which you think that goals are determined by the overarching culture of a society as opposed to smaller social groups or subculturesDefinition of key termersCulture and subcultureA culture is made up of beliefs, behaviors, objects, and other characteristics that members of a specific group or society have in common. Through this, individuals and groups define themselves

The Reality as Opposed to the Disney Versions of Snow White and Sleeping Beauty

2040 words - 9 pages fairytales. Every single girl in these stories are in a “beautiful” state of half-death who wake to find a prince who if eager to carry them off. This can lead to negative psychological effects on young girls as they are growing up, creating a large amount of pressure and low self-esteem due to the beauty that these stories portray and maintaining restrictions that these women experience in the stories. While it is true that Sleeping Beauty and

Discuss the problems and assess the validity of the concept of inspiration in scripture

1142 words - 5 pages account of it. With such a broad group of authors from different time periods, different backgrounds and objectives it seems realistic that the Bible is not infallible, yet it may still be inspired.2Peter 1:21 says how "men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit". The authors of scripture all had a unified trait; they were devoted to doing God's work. Can the Bible be read as an ancient historical text and not as a divine

Social Constructionism and the Message of Feminism

687 words - 3 pages vote and own property. During the second wave era, feminist incorporated the theories of social construction in their message. Social construction is the theory based on the idea that things that are present in our society were created by said society. As it relates to the message of second wave feminism, the biological factors of gender, physical traits, genitalia, hormones and the like, do not determine behaviors, gender roles, social status

Beliefs of the Anti-Federalists

753 words - 3 pages The name, Anti-Federalists is not the best-suited name for what they truly are, or what they believe in. “They are called the Anti-Federalists, but it should be made clear at once that they were not Anti-Federal at all.” (Main xi) Originally, the word federalist, meant anyone who supported the Articles of Confederation. The term “Anti-Federalist” was placed on them to portray them as people who did not agree with the Federal Government, which

Validity of the Constitution

1353 words - 6 pages liberty (Doc. E). Hence, the immorality of slavery would appear paradoxical to the promise of freedom. As can be seen, the Constitution was flawed with concepts that were diametrically opposed, driving an ideological wedge between the Union. The validity of the Constitution was further questioned legally and authoritatively. The supreme court was seen as the final arbiter of law, but Dred Scott v. Sandford heavily tarnished the court's

Similar Essays

Jeffersonian Republicans Vs. Federalists Essay

1167 words - 5 pages Kercheval that, sometimes, people’s ideas and beliefs must grow and change in order to make things better and stay with the times. The Jeffersonian Republicans also realized this. That is why as the nation progressed they obtained more of the ideals of the Federalists.      James Madison was a great president of his time; he made many excellent decisions, many of which were inconsistent with his beliefs. Madison was also

Comparing Strict And Broad Constructionism Essay

929 words - 4 pages Comparing Strict and Broad Constructionism It was 1800, when vice president Jefferson succeeded Adams in the role of president. Jefferson stressed republican virtues of independence and equality and his belief in a frugal government. With his inauguration, the transfer of power to the Republican from the Federalists intensified a political conflict between the two political parties. Even though Jefferson stated in his inaugural address

"We Are All Republicans; We Are All Federalists." Thomas Jefferson. Assess This Statement (Ap Question)

676 words - 3 pages Thomas Jefferson was elected president of the United States in 1801 representing the Democratic-Republican Party. During his inaugural address he declared "We are all Republicans; we are all Federalists." Follow Federalist president John Adams, Jefferson says this because he wanted a smooth transition of powers. With this quote he promised his people that he would compromise, if necessary, for the sake of unity and he backed up his words with

"British Policy Toward Its American Colonies Between 1763 And 1775 Were Justifiable." Assess The Validity Of This Statement.

1229 words - 5 pages NewcombAPUSH per. 3"British policy toward its American Colonies between 1763 and 1775 were justifiable." Assess the validity of this statement.British policy towards its American colonies between 1763 and 1775 was not wholly justifiable. After a century of salutary neglect, intrusive taxes like The Sugar Act of 1764, The Stamp Act of 1765, and The Townshend Act of 1767 were an unjust ploy to pass the buck of England's debt to the colonies and