God's Three Attributes And Morality In Aquinas And Divine Command Theory

1809 words - 7 pages

Divine Command Theory's essential premise is that whatever God commands is good, and whatever he prohibits is evil; nothing else is good or evil. Many objections against this theory occurred over time, including one by Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas had an unusual position, since he opposed this theory while adhering to the traditional monotheistic conception of God, i.e. the perfect entity with the attributes of omnipotence, omniscience and omni-benevolence. In this paper, I will first summarize the Divine Command Theory, abbreviated as DCT. Then I will reconstruct Aquinas' argument against it, which advances an idea of what I will refer to as "God with Intellect". Subsequently, I will take the standpoint of DCT and try to challenge Aquinas by questioning whether his argument of "God with Intellect" negates the traditional power notion, namely omnipotence, of God. Then, I will turn back to Aquinas and present his reply to DCT. His reply will be if God is to be genuinely omni-benevolent, he must have perfect intellect, which stems from his omniscience. At that point of the dispute, it will be evident that there is a clash of fundamental beliefs between DCT and Aquinas, regarding God's power and goodness. DCT sets its focus on God's unalterable omnipotence, whereas Aquinas emphasizes God's omni-benevolence, whilst moderating the traditional definition of omnipotence. In conclusion, I will argue that Aquinas' argument is more applicable to our world, for it attempts to compromise God and ethics in a rather plausible way; whereas DCT seems to be overwhelmed by God's power, may He be exalted, thus letting his omnipotence outweigh his omni-benevolence, and thereby the fixed notion of Goodness.Divine Command Theory was postulated mainly by three authors, namely Gerson, Biel and Luther. Gerson explicitly states in his writing On the Consolation of Philosophy that "God surely does not will exterior things to be made for the reason that they are good; on the contrary, therefore exterior things are good because God wills them to be such." (Part 2, Prose 2). Biel develops a similar argument which states that "God wills it, it is therefore right" (Book 2, Chapter 37, Question 1, Four Books). Hence, God's will is both goodness and righteousness. Luther expands on this fundamental idea and asserts in his text entitled The Reformation Tradition that "God's judgments are past finding out and there cannot be any cause or ground in God's decisions" (The Bondage of the Will, Chapter 5, p. 95). In other words, Luther argues that God's will is unquestionable, since we cannot understand it. Hence we cannot question why "God let Adam fall and tainted us with the same sin", yet we should know that this act was not evil at all; it is justified because God willed it so. Finally, Luther argues that in order to be good, we must obey what God wills without any interrogation, assuming that his will is good itself.In the history of religion, the strongest objection against this...

Find Another Essay On God's Three Attributes and Morality in Aquinas and Divine Command Theory

By Jove: A Brief Look at Polytheistic Divine Command Theory

2036 words - 9 pages Sophocles’ famous play “Antigone” highlights a problem in what was then the prevalent worldview for most pious Greeks, that of Divine Command Theory. Divine Command Theory is a philosophical paradigm, or worldview, which essentially states that an action is good if and only if it has been commanded by a divine entity, which, to quote St. Thomas Aquinas, “all men know as God.” The problem arises in what happens when there exist multiple deities

The Euthyphro Dilemma Vs. The Divine Command Theory Two theories explaining moral behavior explored.

1104 words - 4 pages that theists do not like giving up the concept that God is not morally good, and that he does things for absolutely no reason. The theist can accept the divine command theory only if he rethinks "why" God has created the world the way that he has. A couple things must be considered:1.God's choices, in a way, determine what is good and bad, right and wrong. Morality depends on God.2. The theist must accept the idea that there is a basic set of

Divine Command Theory. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right?

1624 words - 6 pages There are millions of people who believe in God, but among these people the differences lie in to what extent each believes that God has control over what is right and wrong. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right? The Divine Command Theory most simply states that God's commands are what is morally right, and what God forbids is morally wrong. This means that loving one

Doctor Faustus and the Role that Sin plays in God's Divine Plan

1872 words - 7 pages Doctor Faustus and the Role that Sin plays in God's Divine Plan. The nature of sin is brought up many times in the play Doctor Faustus. It seems that Faustus (like all of us) is damned. The question posed is; can we as humans do anything to save ourselves from eternal damnation, or are we doomed from birth. The play deals with Faustus struggle to understand sin and its effect on the human soul. There is a interesting scene where the seven

Aquinas in "Politics and Ethics"

671 words - 3 pages acceptance of certain higher truths of revelation. These truths surpass human reason; they cannot be proved rationally but are beyond reason. Aquinas states that "human reason is related to the knowledge of the truth and faith - in such a way that reason can attain likeness of it that are true but not sufficient to comprehend the truth conclusively or as known in itself." (Ch. 8, p. 5) Therefore Aquinas suggests that the truths of faith are

"God's Divine Justice in Dante's 'Inferno'"

2854 words - 11 pages with exceptions. Just as such self-examiners might encounter their inner demons, so does Dante, both as a character and a writer, as he sets out to walk through his Inferno. The image of being lost in "dark woods" sets up a clear dichotomy between the supposed unenlightened ignorance that one endures due to a lack of faith in God and the clear radiance provided by God's love. Dante uses contrasting symbols to indicate the character's challenge

George Berkeley and His Theory of Human Knowledge God's Inexistence

1214 words - 5 pages razor when he went through Locke's theory, he obviously didn't see the multiplied entity with God in his.Of all things included in Berkeley's theory God's perception, and god's existence just doesn't seem to fit. It strikes me rather unfitting for Berkeley to throw the unnecessary entity of God as the perceiver one's nonexistent or unperceivable world if one can't perceive God. I'm not trying to say that God doesn't exist but according to the good

Locke, Aristotle and Aquinas

2246 words - 9 pages became widely popular throughout Europe and the Americas, they did not meet with unanimous approval.  Many earlier philosophers disagreed with Locke.  Two such philosophers were Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas.  Aquinas disagreed in three key respects:  Compulsion, toleration, and authority.  Aristotle, on the other hand, disagreed on a more fundamental issue:  the goal of politics itself.  This essay aims to elucidate Locke's arguments, and then

Aristotle and Aquinas

2037 words - 8 pages absolute kingship (under such an individual) has the most practical virtue.  Such an persons are neither above nor below the law.  In a sense, they are the law itself.               St. Thomas Aquinas is a proponent of the rule of law.  In Questions 95 to 98 in On Law, Morality, and Politics, Aquinas discusses why the rule of law is necessary.  Aquinas points out that the rule of custom is more efficacious than the rule of law, however

Command and Market Economies

836 words - 3 pages When considering the advantages and disadvantages of command and market economies, you may notice that they are usually straight forward, yet, both advantages and disadvantages may merge at times, resulting in an unclear issue, that could be debatable whether it is for the good of the society, or for the government. Therefore, what I am trying to say, is that no matter how hard you try, it is always impossible to debate on which economic system

Abelard and Aquinas

937 words - 4 pages Peter Abelard was a renowned dialectician from 1079 to 1142. He subjected theological doctrines to logical analysis. In other words, he used rational argument to discover truth. Saint Thomas Aquinas, was a believer in the power of reason, giving St. Augustine's theory an alternate approach. He taught in Paris and Italy during the years 1225 to 1274. Both of these new age thinkers changed the way Catholic followers viewed the "natural world

Similar Essays

Euthryphro And Divine Command Theory Essay

856 words - 3 pages The divine command theory states that something is right or wrong if God commands or forbids it. The theory states that ethical requirements derive from God's commands. The concept is an example of a metaethical theory, one which strives to investigate and clarify the meaning and use of ethical expressions, such as "good", which we see contained within the divine command theory.Several obstacles arise in attempting to clarify what the divine

How Should Theists Interpret The Abraham And Isaac Story? Is This Story An Endorsement Of Divine Command Theory? Or Does It Undermine Divine Command Theory? Or Does It Neither Endorse Nor Undermine...

2122 words - 8 pages Jake Radowski How should Theists interpret the Abraham and Isaac story? Is this story an endorsement of divine command Theory? OR does it undermine Divine Command theory? OR does it neither endorse nor undermine Divine Command TheoryThe biblical story of Abraham and Isaac presents an interesting analogy for those of the belief in Divine Command Theory (which I will refer to in shorthand of [DCT]) while also providing a jump off for which

Magistrates Of Morality: How The Euthyphro Dilemma Cripples Divine Command Theory

2020 words - 8 pages who accept this theory believe that moral action coincides with what has been ordered by the deities, and immoral action would occur when one deviates from these orders. Despite this theory remaining relevant into the twenty-first century, it has still yet to solve one age-old dilemma. The Euthyphro Argument has stumped philosophers for years, but some Divine Command theorists believe they can overcome the massive obstacles it presents. In this

Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished: Views Shared Between Utilitarians, Egalitarians, Altruists And Supporters Of The Divine Command Theory

852 words - 3 pages the victim's family." All of these reasons prove to either be wrong or not fully supported. Morally, it is a continuation of the cycle of violence and degrades all who are involved in its enforcement, as well as its victim.Someone who supports the Divine Command Theory, or someone who believes solely in God's will, would say that capital punishment is wrong for a couple of reasons. The first reason is that executing someone is a lot like "playing