John Rawls On Justice Essay

1572 words - 6 pages

John Rawls was a man who played an influential role in shaping political thought in the late 20th century. Rawls is accredited for writing two major contributions that has helped influence political ideology of those even today. His first piece was published in 1971, A Theory of Justice, which argues his belief of justice on the domestic level and also that reconciliation between liberty and equality must occur in order to have a just society . Rawls’s belief of what justice should be is extremely controversial, and helped put Rawls on the map. Later, after Rawls gained a reliable reputation he published another piece called, Law of the Peoples, which was his application of justice towards international affairs and what he believes America’s Foreign Policy should emulate. In this I will describe both of his works and then throughout I will offer a brief critique on both A Theory of Justice and Law of the Peoples.
John Rawls divided up his theory into four distinct parts; the first part consisted of his belief of primary goods, next is the formation of principles of justice, third is the institutionalization of society, and finally the last part of his theory is the actual workings within society . The general concept of Rawls’s theory is, “all primary goods must be distributed equally unless the unequal distribution of any of these goods is to the advantage of the least favored” . In order to analyze this correctly Rawls’ terms must be defined; according to Rawls a primary good are “things that every rational man is presumed to want. Goods normally have use regardless of a person’s rational plan to life is” . Some examples of a primary good are: basic rights, opportunity, and income to name a few. With the understanding of a primary good one can begin to break down the primary theory behind Rawls A Theory of Justice. So my interpretation is that as long as the primary goods mentioned above are allocated equally among the population or if the poor have a greater advantage then your society is just. Before the goods can be divided up first the society needs to determine what is just and unjust, so laws and policies can begin to resolve what is considered unreasonable.
Next is Rawls formation of justice, he created it so it did not become a right but instead became the catalyst of what a society should live by. The two values within this part is 1.) That the greatest benefit is to the least advantaged and 2.) That everyone has a fair equality of opportunity regardless of upbringing . His third belief wants to institutionalize the basic structure of society. He plans on doing this by forcing society to conform to the required principles by building it into the basic structure of society . This would incorporate with his final part because then the values would be able to influence policy decisions by lawmakers, thus creating a just society.
Previous was Rawls overall concept however in his theory he has two major...

Find Another Essay On John Rawls on Justice

Analysing John Rawls' Theory of Justice and its principles, and the conflicts which may arise from its implementation

1651 words - 7 pages Justice as FairnessThe late John Rawls, in 'Justice as Fairness', acknowledges that society exists for the "mutual benefit of all its members" (Nuttall 2002:223). They should be better off living in a society than not. However, he also indicates that there is a conflict of interest between members within the society, as each tries to accumulate a larger share of wealth and goods available.Rawls' theory of justice is seen as the solution to the

Reflection and Objection on John Rawls

549 words - 2 pages for him to do so. He is basically saying, "If humans were perfect, then this is how they could create a perfect society." An ethical theory based on an "if" is useless if the "if" is not true. Rawls' ideas can be considered irrelevant to the world we live in because humans are not perfect.Bibliography:A Theory of Justice by John Rawls

Justice as Fairness versus the Principle of Average Utility. On John Rawl's statement

2418 words - 10 pages In this essay I will examine the validity of John Rawls' statement that; individuals in the original position (OP) would choose his conception of justice over the principle of average utility. To reach a satisfactory conclusion requires an elaborate groundwork of definitions and concepts, which allows us to illustrate the situation Rawls conceptualized for individuals in the OP, choosing between the two opposing principles of justice. The first

Cesare Beccaria and John Howard´s View on Law and Justice in the 18th Century

1220 words - 5 pages In the mid to late 18th century, prisons across Europe were a problem. Moreover, the judicial system was also corrupt. Cesare Beccaria and John Howard though from very different places shed light on the different areas of the laws and practices associated with the legal system. Beccaria focuses more on how and why people were getting to prison and their rights juxtaposed to the judges who he deemed unimpartial. He sees the corruption of

The Life and Mindd of John Bordley Rawls

1832 words - 8 pages John Rawls – The Life and Mind Scott McDowell CLU 4UA Timmins High and Vocational School Mr. Aston Monday, March 3rd, 2014   JOHN RAWLS – THE LIFE AND MIND Scott McDowell C ontemporary philosopher John Bordley Rawls provided the liberal world with an ethical theory that placed the concept of justice at its center of concentration. John Rawls was arguably one of the most influential political

The Original Position and the Veil of Ignorance

1564 words - 7 pages The Original Position and the Veil of Ignorance Political philosopher John Rawls believed that in order for society to function properly, there needs to be a social contract, which defines ‘justice as fairness’. Rawls believed that the social contract be created from an original position in which everyone decides on the rules for society behind a veil of ignorance. In this essay, it will be argued that the veil of ignorance is an important

Sandel Procedural Republic

753 words - 4 pages , but enables its citizens to pursue their own ends, consistent with a similar liberty for all” (p. 13, ¶1), in such a way that the principles do not assume specific notion of the good. Sandel sums his assertion that John Rawls’ right is prior to the good in two senses: first, is individual rights cannot be sacrificed for good. Second, the rights specified by the principles of justice “cannot be premised on any particular vision of the good life

John Rawls And His Theories

2082 words - 9 pages because there beliefs are not widespread. He goes on to say 'Utilitarianism does not take seriously the distinction between persons'(Singer p. 339).Rawls argues that two principles of justice will emerge from the negotiations of the original position: '1.each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others, and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both

Ethics and Moral Development According to John Rawls and Victor Frankl

1300 words - 5 pages American philosopher, John Rawls, and European philosopher, Viktor Frankl, are highly regarded for their philosophical intellect. While Rawls work focused on the theory of justice, Frankl’s work were in the direction of finding meaning in life. Although, their works took to varying directions, a distinct correlation can be found in their work as it pertains to ethics and moral development. Rawls, in his works speaks of the four roles of

original position

902 words - 4 pages Flavia Neyra Original Position   John Rawls discusses the original position in his book A Theory of Justice. “The Original Position and Justification” is a chapter where Rawls persuades his readers into taking the original position seriously. The original position is a position where people are equal and are rational in order to make principles that they live by fair. However, there is a problem with rational decisions being biased, where people

Rawls' Principles of Justice

1361 words - 5 pages , From a Theory of Justice. pg. 487) In other words Rawls first principle says that each person is allowed to have an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others, allowing everyone to have the same opportunities without infringing on the rights of others. An example being that if we were to place ourselves in each other’s shoes we would be able to fully do what we wanted, with out in a sense “stepping on

Similar Essays

John Rawls, Justice Essay

570 words - 2 pages Rawls opens The Role of Justice with a strong analogy which turns the brain on, justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought. Rawls also gives us the definition we were looking for, the role of justice itself is to insure that the distribution of benefits and burdens is fair.Just is a key center point in a society. Without justice in a society, the society would be ruined. Each person born into a society

John Rawls' A Theory Of Justice

705 words - 3 pages John Rawls' A Theory of Justice John Rawls' "A Theory of Justice" has long been revered as a marvel of modern political philosophy. It's most well-known for the two principles of justice outlined by Rawls: (1) that all persons have an equal right to liberty; and (2) that (a) all inequalities in society should be arranged to benefit the least advantages, and (b) that all positions and offices should be open and accessible as outlined by fair

A Theory Of Justice Presented By John Rawls

1820 words - 7 pages In A Theory of Justice John Rawls presents his argument for justice and inequality. Rawls theorizes that in the original position, a hypothetical state where people reason without bias, they would agree to live in a society based on two principles of justice (Rawls 1971, 4). These two principles of justice are named the first and second principles. The first is the equal rights and liberties principle. The second is a combination of the

This Paper Compares Two Famous Political Philosophers John Rawls And Robert Nozick And Their Approaches To Social Justice

1612 words - 6 pages procedure for altering that status quo while ensuring the justice of the result. For that Nozick presents justice in holdings and Rawls' pressure on the choices of original contractors (John Kilullen, 1).Despite these similarities Nozick sometimes seems contradicting himself. He accepts the view that "it seems morally objectionable that some… should suffer a miserable existence because of inherent weaknesses or handicaps that they neither are