This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Happiness For Aristotle Essay

696 words - 3 pages

In our worlds, feelings have a considerable part in human's life. Feelings are indicator of what people have in their minds. That's when they think something goes wrong, it can be understood, at this time there is a trouble in their faces. Like this, there are a number of feelings people have. However, undoubtedly the best one of them is happiness. It sounds very relaxing, even only this word said to people, it is a reason to smile. As it can be understood, happiness is a feeling which can make you the best and richest man in the world, or in other words, it makes you laugh. However, evaluation of happiness must be different from this. In order to define what really happiness is quality of a whole life is more proper because it requires complete life and complete virtue.The first reason why happiness should be defined as a quality of whole life is necessity of a complete life. Health, wealth or the other goods people have are acceptable contribution for the happiness. However, happiness cannot be evaluated without considering all of them. As Mortimer states, "... happiness consist in accumulation, through the course of whole lifetime all the goods - health, wealth, knowledge, friends, etc. , ..."(35) There are a number of people who has great wealth and knowledge but being unhealthy or not having enough friends are acceptable reason to be considered unhappy. As illustration, Sakıp Sabancı, who died last year, was one of the richest man in Turkey and also in the world. He could buy whatever he wants and he achieved his all goals. However, he was unhappy and he was summarizing his unhappiness by the sentence " I have car factories but these do not make any sense since my son cannot use one of them." Moreover, changes in human's life can support the necessity of complete life. The world is always turning around itself without stopping, like the world everything is changing around people so nobody cannot know what happen in the future. Mortimer says about...

Find Another Essay On Happiness for Aristotle

Aristotle on the Nature of Happiness and Virtue

1643 words - 7 pages Maybe it’s not clear for many people but, for me it is. Happiness does not depend on what we have; happiness comes from us our soul. Aristotle enshrines happiness as a central purpose of human life and a goal in itself. Virtue, which Aristotle believes that is the balance between two excesses, and definitely achieved by maintaining the mean. Aristotle always asks what the ultimate purpose of human existence is. Everywhere we see

Aristotle Wins Ethically: A comparison between John Stuart Mill and Aristotle on happiness

1495 words - 6 pages imperfections of his definition in relation to ethics. Next, I plan to identify Aristotle’s core values for happiness. According to Aristotle, happiness comes from virtue, whereas Mill believes happiness comes from pleasure and the absence of pain. Ethics are the moral principles that govern a person’s behavior which are driven by virtues - good traits of character. Thus, Aristotle focuses on three things, which I will outline in order to answer the

The Pursuit of Happiness and the Union of Aristotle and Genesis

2853 words - 11 pages . These stories show why the pairing of these two opposites makes for the most complete view of happiness as being the highest end of human action. The similarity between the English words "God" and "Good" draws an obvious parallel between them. While Aristotle’s concept of "the Good" has little to do with an all-powerful being, the words he uses when describing "the Good" connote something larger than mankind. Aristotle states: "We reach the

Compare and contrast the concepts of eudaimonia and happiness, and their respective roles in the ethical philosophies of Aristotle and Mill

2188 words - 9 pages In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle attempts to determine what the best life consists in, and demonstrate that all human action aims at eudaimonia. Mill's ethical philosophy is that actions are right if they promote the general amount of happiness, wrong if they decrease it. Their respective concepts, eudaimonia and happiness are similar in many ways, for example, they both embrace the idea of quality of happiness as well as quantity. There is

Aristotle and The Human Good This is an essay on Aristotles arguement that happiness is the highest end of human good. I argue against his points and give details why

1179 words - 5 pages even small children) can be considered happy because happiness is action in accordance with reason. Aristotle is contradicting himself in that he argues that what sets man apart from animal is reason and the ability to perform actions that only humans can perform. Yet, he is arguing that children to not have reason hence he is basically putting them at the level of animals and proving his own argument faulty.He does not leave room for error in his

Aristotle's Argument for People's Actions

654 words - 3 pages Aristotle's Argument for People's Actions Aristotle argues things people do aims at some end or end. The highest end to all of these things is attaining happiness. I maintain that it is impossible for a human being to be happy according to Aristotle's definition due to the fact that he sets strict conditions of perfect virtue thus happiness. Aristotle suggests that happiness is not a state, but rather we count happiness as an activity

is happiness the best good?

686 words - 3 pages Happiness? Is happiness the best good? In book 1 chapter 7 Aristotle brings up the topic happiness and is it the best good for humans. He says “But presumably the remark that the best good is happiness is apparently something [generally] agreed, and we still need a clearer statement of what the best good is. Perhaps, then, we shall find this if we first grasp the function of a human being” (1097b22-25 Aristotle). That statement is saying the

Happiness in Nicomachean Ethics and Living the Rule of St. Benedict Today

569 words - 2 pages . However, people of superior refinement seek happiness. Happiness is the highest goal because it is an end desired entirely for its own sake, and it is selfsufficient. In order to define happiness, the function of man must be considered. Aristotle says that what makes man unique is his ability to reason. Thus reason must be connected to happiness in some way. Aristotle further argues that virtue is also tied to happiness. Virtue can be

Kant and Morality

1706 words - 7 pages subject (Aristotle 2; bk. 1). This shows that different people may judge different things differently. As such, something that is judged as good by one person may be judged as bad by another person. People may differ with respect to what happiness is (Aristotle 2; bk. 1). This demonstrates that what one person finds as a thing that brings joy may not be the same case for another person. Happiness should be considered on the basis of a person’s life

Happiness in Aristotle’s work: The Nicomachean Ethics

763 words - 4 pages Aristotle’s work, The Nicomachean Ethics, consists of numerous books pertaining to Aristotle’s Ethics—the ethics of the good life. The first book discloses Aristotle’s belief on moral philosophy and the correlation between virtue and happiness. The definition of happiness has long been disputed. According to Aristotle, happiness is the highest good and the ultimate end goal—for it is self-reliant. This idea contradicted other common beliefs and

Virtue Ethics

909 words - 4 pages action” (7). Happiness is a complete and sufficient good. This implies that it is desired for itself, also that it is not desired for the sake of anything else, and that it satisfies all desire and has no evil mixed in with it and that it is stable. Happiness has three conditions it must meet in order to be accomplished. In continuation, the first condition that Aristotle states in order to be happy is to live the noble and virtuous life which

Similar Essays

Aristotle Versus Kant On Ethics As The Science For The Achieve To Happiness

1569 words - 7 pages , this "good" must be desired for itself. Second, this "good" can not be desired for some other. Lastly, all other goods are a pathway to it. In sum, this attitude has a property: the final "good" has to be self-sufficient.Everyone can find a "good." All will agree on some "good" relative to them, yet to find this it in and of itself (as the last end is what Aristotle conveys as happiness). To further explain this doctrine we need to focus on the

Aristotle On Happiness Essay

1155 words - 5 pages really exists and persists through life. For him happiness is the goal of goals, the true end of all of our actions. He argues that people are confused about the real meaning of happiness because many think it is a feeling. Aristotle has different thoughts about it; he believes that happiness is not an emotion since it takes action to reach the goal of goals. Emotions are a temporary state and happiness is something that persists, so it cannot be a

Aristotle: The Pursuit Of Happiness Essay

1588 words - 6 pages and that it is “desirable in itself and never for the sake of something else.” All the other good that we experience throughout our lives is just pushing us toward the one thing that will make us happy in the end. Although we may think of being happy as a state of mind, Aristotle thought of it as how you lived your life. In other words, the happiness will not come and go within a couple of minutes or hours. It is a goal that is reached “at the

Aristotle On Happiness And Virtue Essay

2081 words - 8 pages human behaviors and needs. In his writing, Aristotle insisted that there are no particular standard set for morality and that any ethical theory must be based specifically on the human psychology and human nature. Aristotle’s writings and research is based on analytical methods, which is why it serves as a basis for modern research methods. In the current paper, Aristotle’s view on happiness and virtues will be discussed in details