This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Judges Allocation And Sentencing Guidelines Essay

1003 words - 4 pages

1.4 Judges are typically white men with strong political connections. Do you see any problems with this in terms of fairness in sentencing?
Judges allocation of outcomes is constrained by a diversity of factors; race has no weight on sentencing. What is taken into consideration is the severity of the crime and the individual’s criminal history. The judge has to consult the Constitution and a group of statutes and court rules that governs sentencing procedure in that given jurisdiction.
When considering procedures for sentencing, it is important to know that the outset that sentencing is an area in which jurisdictions vary considerably, and to distinguish the differences in sentencing systems may have an important bearing on the applicable procedures.

Nonetheless, except where mandatory sentencing guidelines apply, criminal judges maintain a fair degree of discretion. However they are compel to follow the rules of sentencing. Civil judges also have considerable flexibility in fashioning a remedy, in terms of both the type of remedy whether is monetary vs. other restitution and the amount allocated to the victim. In allocating some resource, decision makers can rely on several different principles of distributive justice.
2. What is the Court Room Workgroup? Define the role of each member of the Courtroom Workgroup
A Courtroom Workgroup is an unofficial arrangement between the criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judge who work together are able to smoothly and efficiently handle cases through cooperative plea-bargaining processes. Because of their position in the justice system, judges have the ability to define the level of their involvement in the processing of criminal cases. How they define their role strongly affects interpersonal relations in the courtroom and the way the group performs its duties, because it deliberate by the way it disposes of cases.
Since the courtroom workgroup deviates from the public consensus of how justice works, it has developed a deviant set of qualities to continue its work and facilitate daily life for the participants. Efficient courtroom workgroups seek to process cases rather than dispense justice. The legal merits of the case are the true determinative factors of an outcome.
Judges: is the person who is eminent on the Bench in the front of the courtroom. While the Judge is mandate by law to rule on the admissibility of the evidence as it comes into trial, the jury is empowered by law to rule on the reliability of the evidence. In addition the judge accepts or approves the guilty pleas when the defendant waives the rights to trial.
Criminal Prosecutor: is a representative of the State or Federal government whose job is to prosecute individuals who have committed crimes and to take legal action for this violation. These are the individuals that will go into the court room and argue to the judge and/or jury that the defendant has committed a crime and should be...

Find Another Essay On Judges Allocation and Sentencing Guidelines

Criminal Sentencing Essay

1312 words - 5 pages guidelines. Judges, with few exceptions, are bound to select a sentence from the aforementioned range; however, as judges do retain some discretion it is the legislature that controls much of the sentencing as they establish the guideline that judges are to utilize. In 1984, The Comprehensive Crime Control Act was passed by Congress, and thus created the United States Sentencing Commission. The primary objective of the United States Sentencing

LAws are the solution Essay

982 words - 4 pages was decided by a judge after the individual has plead guilty or if found guilty in trial. The general sentencing was decided based on the crime and the circumstances, the punishment was intended to be proportional to the crime committed (Champion, 2008). Judges were able to use their discretion on sentencing in accordance to the federal and state sentencing guidelines. However, when the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Laws came into effect, judges

Considerations for the Federal Sentencing Guidelines

1410 words - 6 pages federal judges follow the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, but the state judges tend to use their own techniques to give a sentence. But there is no telling if the Federal Sentencing Guidelines can accurately sentence defendants because every criminal is different. It is not true that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are perfect in respect to the criminal his or herself. The guidelines should not just judge defendants solely on their crime and


1148 words - 5 pages given the racial inequality of the population of the U.S. may face white judges and lawmakers and run the risk of getting a judge who gives reward or gift by favoritism to his similar social group. The inherent social aspect of a judge and jury who find by criminalization of black skin deem the African American unfit for society and offer harsher punishment. Lastly, presumptive sentencing guidelines which used laws set in place to stop unreviewable

Legal Studies Final - Discretionary Sentencing

2557 words - 11 pages , 2013). In fact, it could cost the tax payer thousands more. This can also target disadvantaged and vulnerable groups of society. Youth Studies Australia on the matter of mandatory sentencing: “grave injustices in relation to which groups are most affected by such legislation”. The legal system is also heavily impacted by the removal of discretionary sentencing. Without the discretionary provisions, judges have restricted judicial power and


2123 words - 9 pages “Reducing judicial discretion through guidelines and then strengthening the role of Judges through the abolition of parole.” (Urban Institute 2002). According the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 16 states have sentencing guidelines and active commissions; all but five states have adopted mandatory minimum sentences for using a deadly weapon, and all but 2 have habitual offender laws. States have adopted truth in sentencing over another sentencing reform

Mandatory Sentencing

1776 words - 7 pages populations and correction costs increased and pushed states to build more prisons. Judges were overloaded with these cases, and lengthy prison terms were mandated to these young offenders. Mandatory sentencing is an interesting topic in which I would like to discuss my opinions in going against mandatory sentencing. I will show the reasons for this topic, as well as give you my personal brief on which I support. To begin, Mandatory minimum

Criticall evalute the statement 'punishment should be commesurate with the seriousness of the offence'

1308 words - 6 pages individual cases. The level of seriousness will depend on the circumstances in which the offence was committed. The Sentencing Council for England and Wales provides guidelines setting out what factors should be considered by judges and magistrates when imposing sanctions on offenders. Whilst allowing for judicial discretion these guidelines also allow for consistency and transparency in sentencing. Sentencing guidelines create the

Crime Control Critical Comments

958 words - 4 pages the criminal justice decisions away from judges and put these decisions in the hands of politicians. In this modern age of sentencing, anyone who can read a chart can now complete this task; judges are no longer needed.Crime Control modernity is contradictory from the outset. It is not simply a break from the past but is in a constant state of reinventing itself. This gives modernity a decidedly dark side. We live in a world in which criminality

The Disparity In Sentencing Amongst Minorities In Prison

1906 words - 8 pages offered rehabilitation. In Conclusion, the high disparity of sentencing amongst minorities in the judicial system comes from the population’s racial inequality, presumptive sentencing guidelines and social issues such as racism, education and poverty. In the American court system minority defendants given the racial inequality of the population of the U.S., may face white judges and lawmakers at with more frequency, thereby running

Criminal Punishment: Sentencing

1283 words - 5 pages The sentencing process is created by some of the legislative party, who use their control to decide on the type of criminal punishment. The sentencing guidelines for the judges to go by can be different depending on the jurisdiction and can include different sentencing such as “diversionary programs, fines, probation, intermediate sanctions, confinement in jail, incarceration in a state or federal prison, and the death penalty” (Siegel

Similar Essays

Punishment And Sentencing Guidelines And Issues

2415 words - 10 pages Untitled Running head: FINAL ESSAY Essay Punishment and Sentencing� After researching the National Center for State Courts of Texas the system structures are as follows. Municipal court consists of 917 cities 1,414 judges. In this court you have local trial courts of limited jurisdiction. The Municipal Courts consists of Criminal misdemeanors punishable by fine

Federal Guideline Sentencing Essay

958 words - 4 pages In the past two decades, major developments in guideline sentencing have taken place due to Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Disparities which led to dramatic changes by the U.S. Supreme Court in Federal guideline sentencing. Prior to the implementation of sentencing guidelines, judges had total judicial discretion in determining sentence lengths leading to a wide fluctuation of sentences to offenders convicted of similar crimes due to the

Truth In Sentencing Policies And The Effects On Courts And Prisons

1637 words - 7 pages Guidelines Manual to help determine the prison sentence for convicted offenders. The Sentencing Guidelines' primary goal was to alleviate sentencing disparities. Some of the criteria judges use to help make their decision include the age, education level, mental and emotional condition, role of the offender, and previous criminal history. These sentencing guidelines can help determine the length of a prison sentence, when combined with truth

Sentencing Guidelines In The Criminal Justice System

3816 words - 16 pages The criminal justice system has been in place the United States for centuries. The system has endured many changes throughout the ages. The need for a checks and balances system has been a priority for just as long. Federal sentencing guidelines were created to help create equal punishments among offenders. Judges are given the power of sentencing and they are not immune to opinions, bias, and feelings. These guidelines are