Judicial Precedent Essay

1092 words - 4 pages

Judicial Precedent

ESSAY: a) Explain and illustrate the operation of the doctrine of judicial precedent.
b) How far is it true to say judges are bound by decisions in earlier cases?


Judicial precedent is where the past decisions of the judges create law for future judges to follow. English precedent is based on the Latin, stare decisis, meaning stand by what has been said in the past. This allows the rules system to be consistent: like cases treated alike, and it is just, as people can decide on a course of conduct knowing what the legal consequences will be.
Judicial Precedent can only operate if the legal reasons for past decisions are known, therefore, at the end of the case there will be a judgement. This will contain the precise words of the judge and follow a Law Report, which consists of full accounts of cases that are considered important. It will give an account of the facts of the case and a summary of the decision. The principles of law that the judge used to make his decision are the important part of the judgement, and are known as ratio decidendi, or 'the reason for deciding'. This is what creates a precedent for judges to follow in future cases. This is identified not by the judge that makes the decision, but by lawyers looking at it afterwards, they may therefore have different views on it. The remainder of the judgement is called obiter dicta and in future cases, judges do not have to follow it. These are other things the judge said, such as the reasoning and explanation of why he made the decision. It may also contain a hypothetical situation, what his decision would have been if the facts of the case had been different, and the legal reasoning may be considered in future cases. If a new event that hasn't been decided before comes to the court (original precedent), it is likely that the judge will look at cases which are close in principle and decide to use similar rules. This idea of creating new law by analogy can be seen in Hunter v Canary Wharf (1995). The interference with the reception on Hunter's television because of Canary Wharf Tower having been built, was likened to the case of Bland v Molselely (1661), in respect to the loss of a view. The two things were said to be a matter of "delight" and not "necessity" so could not come before the courts.
In England and Wales, the courts have a very rigid doctrine of judicial precedent, which has the effect that every court is bound to follow any decision made by a higher court and that appellate courts are bound by their own decisions. Decisions made in the European Court of Justice bind all other courts since 1973 and can overrule its own decisions. Decisions made in the House of Lords bind all lower courts, especially Court of Appeal, and, since 1966 when it issued a practise statement, can overrule past decisions. This is clearly seen in DPP. NI v Lynch when the House of Lords said that duress could be a defence to a charge of murder,...

Find Another Essay On Judicial Precedent

Is Judicial Precedent an efficient System of Lawmaking?

1570 words - 6 pages Is Judicial Precedent an efficient System of Lawmaking? Judicial precedent often referred to as case law, is one of the main sources of English law. Its roots go back to the early common laws of the country. It is based on the Latin maxim Stare decisis et non quieta morvere, which loosely translated means, stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established. In order for the judicial precedent system to

Common Law in Australia Essay

1090 words - 4 pages a reason for a decision of another court that is not binding, and should only be considered for its persuasive value. It is the role of the judge in the common law system to develop and expand the common law where he or she sees fit. It is paramount for judges to base their decisions on cases on judicial precedents. The system of precedent can only operate effectively if the respective precedents are recorded. From as early as the beginning of

History and Application of Common Law

1873 words - 7 pages are presenting arguments to a court, and courts may use it when they are attempting to interpret a statute.” 2a) Judicial Precedent is defined as a legal case law establishing a principle or rule that a court or other judicial body may apply while deciding subsequent cases involving similar issue [Judicial Precedent Law & Legal Definition, 2001:1]. In other words, it is a system whereby a lower court judges take into account Supreme Court

Legal Review

1396 words - 6 pages the civil law tradition it does not have any common law reference and judicial precedent, therefore all legal cases must be addressed against a certain law applicable for the case which will also determine the outcome of the verdict of the mentioned case. Finally the judicial system of Greece (Hellas) is completely independent and its independence is guaranteed by the constitution. The Greek judicial system has the authority to review

Marbury vs Madison

921 words - 4 pages nonpartisan instrument. It established the precedent for the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of laws, through the principle of judicial review. The development of this power to interpret the constitution instituted the flexibility of the constitution and the ability to forge a road of precedent unfamiliar to the new government, as well as firmly grounding the role of the Judicial Branch. To up hold the precedent already

Utility of the Jamaican Court Structure

855 words - 3 pages Assignment: In no more than two to three pages, explain the utility of the Jamaican court system.The Jamaican Common Law system of jurisprudence has been adopted from English Common Law which is based on the doctrine of judicial precedent, the principle of which the lower courts must follow the decisions of the higher courts, rather than on statutory laws. Such a system originates from the doctrine of stare decisis et non quieta mover meaning

The Difference between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint

846 words - 3 pages The Difference between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint Our American judiciary branch of the federal government has contributed and molded our American beliefs in this great nation. This branch of government is respected because of the code of conduct that the judges, no matter how conservative or liberal. The language of the court as well as the uniform of the cloaks that judges wear has most probably contributed towards this

Precedent: This essay looks at all the aspects of precedent with cases to back up the essay.

2198 words - 9 pages Judicial Precedent by Anthony HarteJudicial precedent often referred to as case law, is one of the main sources of English law. Its roots go back to the early common laws of the country. It is based on the Latin maxim Stare decisis et non quieta morvere, which loosely translated means, stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established.In order for the judicial precedent system to work, an accurate detailed method of reporting

Judges' Need to Follow Previous Precedent

908 words - 4 pages dispute. He wanted the Court if appeal to be able to overrule a previous decision if convinced that the decision was wrong but the House of Lords unequivocally and unanimously reaffirmed the rules of precedent in 'Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co (1944)'. The lower courts can avoid following precedent by distinguishing, overruling and reversing. Distinguishing in judicial precedent is where certain important facts of a case


1440 words - 6 pages reached the Supreme Court. Because Heller was arguing that he was being stripped of his second Amendment rights, the opinion of the Supreme Court promised to either set precedent for future cases, or mandate that the District of Columbia would have to edit their laws. When deciding cases, the courts can choose whether they act through judicial activism or judicial restraint. When exercising judicial activism, the courts are usually making

Essay about the importance of the independence of the judiciary in Australia

1830 words - 7 pages the Commonwealth and, in particular, Chap. III thereof.'The application was upheld by a majority of the Court. The decision was also affirmed in an appeal to the Privy Council.This case set a precedent that the Parliament cannot invest Ch III courts and/or judges with non-judicial power, which further instates that independence of the judiciary within Australia.A further Case which also highlights that the independence of the judiciary is not

Similar Essays

Judicial Precedent Essay

2214 words - 9 pages Judicial Precedent Setting a precedent is providing an example for others to follow. Legal precedent is however slightly more complicated. It is the term given to a previous decision, a particular stance or view, judge's Statement, or the effect of certain fact(s) present within a past case; which dictates or influences the adjudication or verdict of a later case. Or put simply 'a reason for deciding a particular issue as

Judicial Precedent Essay

2651 words - 11 pages Judicial Precedent "Within the present system of precedent in the English legal system, judges have very little discretion in their decision making." Judges have always been relied upon to interpret and apply the law. Therefore, their decisions should be fair and consistent so as the individuals seeking legal remedies would have more faith in the judicial system of the state. AS the UK has not a very complete and/or

Judicial Precedent Essay

2181 words - 9 pages Judicial Precedent A) Explain what is meant by the doctrine of precedent. (11) B) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the doctrine of precedent? (14) A) The doctrine of judicial precedent is at the heart of the common law system of rights and duties. The courts are bound (within limits) by prior decisions of superior courts. One level includes stare decisis, this means to stand by what has been

Detailed Revision Notes On British Judicial Precedent

808 words - 3 pages Judicial Precedent. Introduction. § Judicial precedent means the use of decisions made by judges in the past as a source of law, where a similar case arises the past decision is used as a guideline. § It is also known as case law. § It is a major source of law both today and historically. § If law on a particular source of law is not found in legislation - law will be found through common law reasoning