Julius Caesar And Napoleon Bonaparte Essay

2251 words - 9 pages

Throughout the history Europe, kings and dictators have been notorious for their unquenchable thirst for power and complete domination; the lure of absolute supremacy and total allegiance was too tempting to disregard. Some made their way by the rights of birth, others by scheming their path through politics. But none are as infamous than that of Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte. Both Napoleon and Caesar achieved great glory by bringing their countries out of the turmoil that followed the revolutionary ages, utilizing their political and military support as well as their outstanding tactics in warfare. Though Caesar had major accomplishments, Napoleon receives the most praise for his work in creating efficient governmental systems, along with his feats in the military. Together, both men reshaped their countries and gave a new order to their empires, whilst still remaining in favour with the people.

Julius Caesar was born during the instability of Rome- the element of disorder ruled the Republic, which discredited its nobility and could not keep control over Rome’s considerable size and influence. After the death of Rome's dictator, Sulla, Caesar returned from military service and organised a private army to attack Mithradates VI Eupator, King of Pontus, who was an enemy of Rome. Soon after, Caesar began working with Pompey, a former lieutenant that served under Sulla but had switched sides following the dictator's death. At around 68 BC Caesar was elected quaestor (base political office). Eight years later, in 60 BC, Julius served as governor of the Roman province of Spain. Whilst maintaining his relationship with Pompey, Caesar also aligned himself with Roman general and politician Marcus Licinius Crassus, who provided Caesar with financial and political support. Pompey soon grew jealous of Caesar’s rising popularity, and their relationship deteriorated and transformed into war. By the end of 48 BC, Caesar was able to push his enemies completely out of Italy, and successfully pursued Pompey into Egypt, where he was eventually killed. There, Caesar aligned himself with Cleopatra, with whom he had a son, Caesarion. After returning to Rome, Caesar was awarded Dictator for Life, and was known as the Father of his Country. Throughout his reign, Julius was able to reform much of his country; he relieved the debt, re-organised the local government, and granted citizenship to foreigners. But his popularity with the Senate was another matter entirely. Jealousy and fear concerning Caesar's increasing power led to angst among a number of politicians and members of the Senate who saw him trying to aspire to become king, and history had proven that Romans have never had the desire for monarchical rule. And when Caesar wished to include his former Roman enemies in the government, it was evident that his downfall was imminent. Gaius Cassius Longinus and Marcus Junius Brutus were both former enemies who'd joined the Senate. Together, the two of them...

Find Another Essay On Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte

Brutus, Caesar, and Antony as Protagonists in Julius Caesar

1333 words - 5 pages leader who is depicted in many different ways. Brutus friend of Caesar, loves Caesar greatly but does not think he possess leadership skills. Antony is loyal, trustworthy, and a devoted follower of Caesar, and proves to be a required character in Julius Caesar. All three of the protagonist must go through many highs and lows throughout the play. Brutus, Caesar, and Antony all qualify as protagonists in Julius Caesar because they all exhibit the

Comparison of Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln

1107 words - 4 pages Abraham Lincoln and Julius Caesar are undoubtedly two men who made history by and through their governance on their own nations. When making comparison of these two great men, one significant feature or mode of comparison is their assassination. Comparing Julius Caesar’s assassination to that of Abraham Lincoln shows both differences and similarities. In either case, the Roman General and the U.S. President were killed by people who were

George Washington and Julius Caesar Comparison

2729 words - 11 pages Washington was and what he did to change history. Julius Caesar did have many accomplishments which consisted of his climb up the military chain to become Rome’s first king in five-hundred years and his part in the famous triumvirate rule (Pompey, Caesar, and Crassus) that came to power in Rome some time after Caesar's first decrees (Julius Caesar Definition). One of his many failures includes the dividing of Rome’s upper and lower class which

Treachery and Deceit in Julius Caesar

812 words - 3 pages Treachery and Deceit in Julius Caesar In this essay I am going to examine how each of the characters in Julius Caesar were noble or not noble in the things they did and decide who is the most noble as well as examining the ways treachery and deceit are shown in the play. Firstly Julius Caesar. We know Caesar is a good leader and fighter in battle because everybody comes out to see his return at the start of the

Revenge in Julius Caesar and Othello

1902 words - 8 pages Authors, in works of literature, often use the theme of revenge because it adds intrigue and suspense to a story. Julius Caesar and Othello by William Shakespeare are two plays whose most predominant theme is revenge. This is illustrated through the characters, symbols, and settings of both works. Revenge is a constant theme throughout the play Othello. It is portrayed through one of the character Iago. Iago is determined to destroy Othello

Conflicting Perspective Julius Caesar And The Pianist

983 words - 4 pages The composers of texts, Julius Caesar and The Pianist, use acts of representations to construct credible viewpoints that are conveyed to the audience in a certain event displayed in the texts. This is seen in the text, Julius Caesar, by the portrayal of events including the Oration and Calpurnia’s Dream. This notion is made evident to the Elizabethan audience in the Representation process and these devices are utilized to show the viewpoints

Julius Caesar contrasts between Brutus and Cassius

3691 words - 15 pages JULIUS CAESAR COUSEWORK ESSAY Julius Caesar is set in 44 BC were Rome was a republic. Roman influence had spread beyond Italy and through the Mediterranean and some of North Africa and also parts of Germany, Belgium and Britain. A senate governed Rome. The main objective of all this meant that not one person was solely in charge and had absolute power and were king like. Marcus Brutus is the most complex character in this play

Julius Caesar Essay: Brutus's and Antony's Speeches

1052 words - 4 pages Brutus's and Antony's Speeches in Julius Caesar   William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar is a tragic story of the dog and the manger.  After Caesar is killed Mark Antony, a good friend of Caesar, plots to revenge his bloody death.  He knows there is strength in numbers, and through a speech at Caesar's funeral, Antony plans to win the crowd of Rome and turn them against Brutus and the other conspirators.  Cassius is one of

Motivation and Manipulation in Julius Caesar

1839 words - 7 pages In Julius Caesar, Shakespeare illuminates the themes of human motivation and manipulation. He examines the relationship between actions and motivations, cause and effect, and word and deed, using the symbols of hands and hearts. Throughout the play, the characters Brutus and Marc Antony express their different understandings of this relationship rhetorically. In his 1953 film interpretation, Joseph L. Mankiewicz demonstrates these characters

Ambition and the Downfall of Macbeth, Idi Amin, and, Napoleon Bonaparte

2577 words - 10 pages . Those leaders are Macbeth, Idi Amin, and, Napoleon Bonaparte. Macbeth is the main character in Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Macbeth was born into low ranking nobility and rose to fame as a general. He did so well in the military that he became the Thane of Glacis, which was later to be followed by the title: Thane of Cawdor. Macbeth’s success is great but he was tempted by three witches to be even more ambitious. They gave him a prophecy that said

The Rise of Napoleon Bonaparte and the reasoning for his failure.

2504 words - 10 pages from this turbulent time as a revolutionary. Many have gone on to describe the French Emperor as an aberration. Nevertheless, Napoleon Bonaparte was produced by the French class system. The makings of a improvised upbringing and a time of indulgence of self-profit. Hence, it was only inevitable that a Napoleon Bonaparte would be unleashed on the world. The embodiment of blind ambition and survival skill that would one day be utilized to rule his

Similar Essays

Napoleon Bonaparte And His Military Tactics

614 words - 2 pages Napoleon Bonaparte and His Military Tactics Although he inspired new social, economic, and political ideas, Napoleon Bonaparte is better known for his military tactics. Even today, his battle plans are used and studied by many in the military. Napoleon, who started out as an extremely short and wimpy foreigner who rose to become Emperor of France, died in 1821 at St. Helena, a remote island in the South Atlantic. He was fifty-two years old

Napoleon Bonaparte And The Catholic Church

2182 words - 9 pages Tension grew between the Catholic Church and France during the French Revolution, leading to a schism, which deeply devastated the Church’s economy. Pope Pius VII and Napoleon Bonaparte came into power as the French Revolution was ending. For different reasons they both saw the importance of restoring Roman Catholicism’s position in France. The Catholic Church’s initial support of Napoleon greatly affected both parties (O’Dwyer 12-14, 43, 49

Rise And Fall Of Napoleon Bonaparte`s Empire

763 words - 3 pages Napoleon Bonaparte was born on the island of Corsica in 1769. He was the third son and fourth child of Carlo Buonaparte and Letizia Ramolino. In Napoleons twenties, he adopted the name Napoléon Bonaparte. Later on in life Napoleon attended a military academy, he gained the officer rank quickly since so many officers fled France during this time. In 1793 Napoleon got to command French troops and they chased out the British from Toulon. Two

Napoleon Bonaparte And Mohandas Gandhi Two Great Leaders

592 words - 2 pages Some historians view history as a chain of events caused or involving certain extraordinary people. This viewpoint can be supported by examining the impact that leaders have had on their society throughout history. These exceptional individuals led their people in a new direction whether or good or bad. Two leaders who changed the society in which they lived were Napoleon Bonaparte and Mohandas Gandhi. Napoleon was able to lead his country out