Jurors And Cases In Court Essay

1229 words - 5 pages

The reason for these reactions is due to the fact that jurors are all influenced by different decision making abilities. These abilities can be shaped by varying emotional reactions to case information, jurors intelligence, their abilities to retain certain information, and of course their own personal and cultural views. As a result, jurors establish different perceptions and opinions despite all the jurors being given the same information. The procedure of applying a juror’s perception of certain views on life and how those views apply to the facts and information being presented to them in the case are the main forces behind each juror’s individual conclusions on the case. Jurors seem to rarely alter their opinions on how they feel about a certain case, but they may change their minds on how things should have been presented to them. This can be observed in the participation and comments of the jurors in this certain case.
All jurors in this particular case participated and took an active role, yet J1, J4, J7, J8, J12 were the most vocal. J1, J4, J7, and J8 had very strong personalities and naturally appeared to want to be active in the deliberations. J2 appeared to have a strong personality as well, but soon made their mind up about the situation. J1 and J7 as will be discussed later on appear to be the most similar and often support and defend each other throughout the jury deliberation. J12 was active merely because she had to out of self-defense. J12 was the only juror that did not agree with the majority’s conclusions about Ducic and constantly had to defend herself and provide rebuttals with little support from the other jurors. Nevertheless, it appears jurors with strong opinions on the case participate more in the conversation. Even if it is as little as replying to another juror’s comment.
Equally important to the component of participation in analyzing jury deliberations is that of information sharing among jurors. It is natural to converse about facts of a trail during deliberations even though courts tend to look down upon this. Each juror starts out each one of these information sharing like sessions with a core set of views based on their own interpretations. As discussions on the case begin these individual ideas are shared with the rest of the jurors. These ideas are especially like to gain much support by other jurors whom share similar characteristics and thoughts. For example, J1 and J7, being the only males of the group appear to support each other on their ideas throughout the deliberation process. In fact, they appear to support each other even more when J12 speaks because J12 has the opposite ideas as they do. For example, when the jurors are discussing about coming to a unanimous decision and J12 speaks about not choosing to come to one the two men support each other:
Juror 1: Are you uh…
Juror 12: Finished. Yes I’m done.
Juror 1: First thing, whether you like it or not, you took an oath to upheld...

Find Another Essay On Jurors and Cases in Court

Court cases dealing with judicial review and the 2nd amendment

981 words - 4 pages promotions because they hired less qualified blacks, which violated Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court merged together the cases of Personnel Board v. Wilks and Arrington v. Wilks. Did Wilks and other white firefighters have a constitutional right to challenge the previously established decrees? Yes, in a 5-4 decision. The Court ruled that the white firefighters were not prohibited from challenging employment choices taken following to the

Supreme Court Cases on Separation of Church and State Clauses

2424 words - 10 pages connection between God and the good of civilization was destroyed. God is slowly being taken out of classrooms, ceremonies and even sporting events. The entities of Church and State have not been separated, but it does affect many. When debating the subject, it should not matter what religion you are, but how people’s rights are affected. Since the beginning of America, there have been multiple Supreme Court cases in which people, schools and

Argues in favor of the right to marry for same sex couples or homosexuals based on the fourteenth amendment and precedents set in past supreme court cases.

3941 words - 16 pages landmark cases as Brown vs. Board of Education and Plessy v. Ferguson.Plessy v. Ferguson involved a man named Homer Plessy who was 1/8 black and 7/8 white. Intending to challenge the constitutionality of separate facilities for blacks and whites under the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments, he sat in a section of a bus reserved for white persons only. He was later arrested and repealed his case to the Supreme Court. The decision established that

Nationalism After the War of 1812 and Important Court Cases of the Time.

565 words - 2 pages of Marbury vs. Madison in 1803. Being a Federalist he was a great rival to Thomas Jefferson. He served until 1835 and was the forth Supreme Court Justice. His only legal schooling was six weeks attending lectures at the College of William and Mary, however when he took the bench in 1801, he changed the Judicial Branch as we know it. In fact, he made the branch the most powerful section of the government at that time. His most significant early

Criminal Justice/ DIscuss the Bill of rights and their court cases and how they are applied today

726 words - 3 pages question that appeared was whether the states were allowed to present illegally seized evidence in court. The Court held that the Fourteenth amendment did not subject criminal justice in the states to specific limitations and that illegally obtained evidence did not have to be excluded from trials in all cases. This case was vital in that it required "warrants " to any searches or seizures.The Fifth Amendment ruled against 'double jeopardy', which

The Role and Proceedings in a Court

2366 words - 9 pages and disputes between the husband and the wife. Most of the cases that are brought in a magistrates court are concluded through acquittals, conviction and sentencing by the magistrates. Magistrates do not work for a regular pay but in the course of their duties, they are given reasonable allowances to meet their travel, subsistence and loss of earning. According to Hunter and Roberts, 1997, p.35, any one aged above eighteen years and has been

Judicial Minimalism and Mazimalist in Court Rulings

2351 words - 10 pages for public use has been debated for many years as seen in cases such as Berman v. Parker and Hawaii Housing Auhority v. Midkiff. Despite the courts conversion of public use into public purpose and ruling in favor of the city, the majority opinion possesses a minimalistic reasoning to support its decision. Although petitioners urged the court to “adopt a new bright-line rule that economic development did not qualify as public use” the court

The Role and Powers of Lay Magistrates in Criminal Cases

1173 words - 5 pages The Role and Powers of Lay Magistrates in Criminal Cases 1a) Describe the role and powers of lay magistrates in criminal cases. b) Consider whether lay magistrates are adequately trained for their work. 1a) Describe the role and powers of lay magistrates in criminal cases. For centuries the criminal justice system has allowed lay people; people who are not legally qualified to administer justice to the

Justifiying Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest

1871 words - 7 pages Justifiying Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest Abortion:" the expulsion or removal of a human foetus from the uterus before the foetus is capable of independent survival" (Heinemann English dictionary). "…In these tragic cases the great value of the mental health of a woman who becomes pregnant as a result of rape or incest can best be safe-guarded by abortion. It is also said that a pregnancy caused by rape

Supreme Court cases who's decisions have greatly impacted society. (Veronia vs. Acton (1995), Planned Parenthood vs. Casey (1992), Lee vs. Weisman (1991), and United States vs. Lopez (1995).

1011 words - 4 pages The Supreme Court of the United States is at the apex of the United States judicial system. Ever since its creation, it has affirmed and interpreted the facts within the Constitution. The Court's decisions have greatly affected society. Four major cases which have had cataclysmic effects on society are Veronia vs. Acton (1995), Planned Parenthood vs. Casey (1992), Lee vs. Weisman (1991), and United States vs. Lopez (1995).The case of Veronia vs

An essay on the International Criminal Court, with a mark of 18.75/20. Including- Overview, History, Jurisdiction, Structure, Rights of the accused and Current Cases

1026 words - 4 pages Pakistan over Kashmir. The United States has not signed the treaty citing that it denies fundamental American human rights, it is a political court without appeal, and there is an absence of jury trials, no right to a speedy trial, public trial or reasonable bail although these are all elements of the American military trials which have been used to try David Hicks and other Guantanamo Bay prisoners.>In 1948, following the Nuremberg and Tokyo

Similar Essays

Supreme Court Cases: The Contrast In The Constitution And Constitutional Law

1177 words - 5 pages This paper discusses the contrast of two landmark United States (U.S.) Supreme Court cases that helped to clearly define how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution is interpreted, and analyzes the difference between the “Constitution” and “Constitutional Law.” Two cases that are referenced in this analysis are (1) Katz v. United States, 386 U.S. 954 (U.S. March 13, 1967), and (2) Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (U.S

Were The Supreme Court Cases In The 1890's Fair?

1462 words - 6 pages but equality. When you separate the two groups and say they are equal, they are actually not equal at all. When the court said that Plessy was wrong for sitting in the wrong car and refusing to move they basically are saying blacks are not good enough to mix with the whites. Even though Plessy was right just because he was black he was found guilty, in a very one sided case.These three cases were very lopsided for different reasons. Plessy Vs

Crime And Justice In American History (Significant Court Cases And Laws That Help Or Discourage The Rights Of Criminals)

1210 words - 5 pages . The Declaration of Principles was established further protecting the rights of criminals in prisons. However, the core period in history concerning criminal justice reform occurred in the mid and later years of the 1900s.The Supreme Court has played a significant role in government's enhancement and restrictions of criminal protection. Through many vital court cases the rights of criminals have been heavily increased. Some laws and court cases

U.S History And Government: Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

988 words - 4 pages restrictions. Supreme Court cases have a lot of credence and many Supreme Court cases have had lasting effects on our society today. Two landmark supreme court cases which have an exceptional impact in the present day are Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka and Tinker v. Des Moines School District. These two cases had a great impact on US History and affected our lives forever.Perhaps no other case decided by the Court in the 20th century has