This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Justice Antonin Scalia Essay

1061 words - 5 pages

Judge Antonin Scalia is a New Jersey native, born in Trenton on March 11, 1936. He grew up in Manhattan, NY where his affinity for learning evolved from great teachers who gave him an incentive to put a great deal of importance on education. In middle school he studied many languages- Latin, Greek and French, which didn’t necessarily make for an introduction to the world of law. He continued his study of languages in college at Georgetown University and even declared a major in history. The idea to pursue law, however, came from his uncle back in Trenton. He saw how much his uncle enjoyed his work as well as spent a great deal of time at his law offices. The gears began to turn, and as expected from a Unites States Supreme Court justice, but unexpectedly for him, Justice Scalia applied to and attended one of the country’s finest law programs at Harvard University.

Antonin married Maureen McCarthy in September of 1969, with whom he has 9 children. Upon graduation from Harvard, he and Maureen took to Europe to study abroad. A year later, upon their return to the states, Scalia took the Ohio state bar exam and was accepted there as well as Virginia. Once in Virginia, Justice Scalia practiced commercial law for a short period and then taught at the University of Virginia as a law professor. So not only was he a well-rounded student, but he became an educator himself, taking a cue from those who sparked his interest in the world of education and inspired him most, his teachers.

Shortly before beginning Scalia made the move to Washington D.C. and worked in a number of federal jobs in governmental institutions. He worked in what he called the “fun” branch of government, the executive as a general counsel for the Office of telecommunications policy. He then chose to stay in government as a legal counsel during the Ford Presidency, but left during the Carter administration to teach again. His returned to teaching included revisited his Alma Mater at Georgetown as a visiting professor of law, as well as taught at the University of Chicago.

In early 1980, during the Reagan administration, he was nominated by the President to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Just as he had hoped before he left public service to teach, he had returned and was sworn in on 17 August 1982. Four short years later, President Reagan nominated him as Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, on which he has been an “originalist” sticking strictly to textual interpretation since he took the oath of office on 26 September, 1986.

In a pretty recent court case, Reno vs. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (1999), Justice Scalia gave the majority opinion of the court. In this case, an immigrant sued the city of Reno in Nevada to say that they was being wrongly deported in a case of discrimination. The discrimination being that he was associated with an organization that was ‘unpopular’. The alien argued that this was a...

Find Another Essay On Justice Antonin Scalia

Constituional Procedure Analytical Review

1121 words - 4 pages was the first guarantee to be made applicable to the states thanks to Gitlow v New York. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that speech may not be prohibited simply because some may find it offensive.[3: Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997), 143n.23.][4: J. Scott Harr, Kären M. Hess, and Christine M.H. Orthmann, Constitutional Law and the Criminal Justice System, 5 ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2011), 131-32.][5: J. Scott Harr, Kären M. Hess, and Christine M.H. Orthmann, Constitutional Law and the Criminal Justice System, 5 ed. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2011), 138.]

Anthony Kennedy: Supreme Justice Law Maker

609 words - 3 pages colleagues considered of foreign law is seen as a prominent factor. It raised ire of conservative members of congress and political pundits. While Kennedy was on the bench he proved to be markedly conservative early in his tenure, in Kennedy’s first term he voted with Chief justice William H. Rehnquist and Justice Antonin Scalia. They were two of the courts most conservative member more than 90 percent of the time. With Justice Sandra Day O’Connor

Final Essay

2182 words - 9 pages , and Holt v. Sarver in 1971. Comparatively, the Supreme Court made significant ruling in Cooper v. Pate in 1964 as well as in the 1978 case of Hutto v. Finney. Each case was unique and for that reason the rulings were as unique as the cases themselves. This led to unprecedented rulings with lasting effects to set precedents for the prison system. Today, Antonin Scalia is the Supreme Court justice with the most influence on the procedures that

Nonoriginalist Adjudication

1982 words - 8 pages constitutional interpretation put forth by Paul Brest and Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia contrast as much in philosophy as they do in name; nonoriginalism allows the interpreter to stray from the purview of the Constitution for the sake of social progress, while originalism holds the interpreter within the limits of the text, in order to preserve traditional values. To begin with, Scalia’s originalist understanding of the Constitution emphasizes the

US Supreme Court

599 words - 2 pages . Antonin Scalia a. Nominated by Ronald Reagan b. Scalia shows Conservative views 7. David H. Souter a. Nominated by George Bush b. Souter is neither a conservative nor a liberal. He falls in the middle of both, which is annoying for both sides, but is very well respected within the Justices.8. John Paul Stevens a. Nominated by Ford b. Stevens in also in the middle of liberalism and conservatism. Recently he has been voting more along the lines of a moderate.9. Clarence Thomas a. Nominated by George Bush Thomas has aligned closely with the far right of the Court. He votes frequently on the same side as the conservatives, and shares a lot of the same views.

Capital Punishment Essay: Retardation and Capital Punishment

793 words - 3 pages maturing society"(Trop). If standards of decency "evolve" and are not fixed (or devolve as is the case with decency today), then the Constitution can also "evolve" and come to mean whatever the court wishes it to mean. That is the point made by the dissenters.   Dissenting, Justice Antonin Scalia said: "...the views of professional and religious organizations and the result of opinion polls are irrelevant. Equally irrelevant are the

Unmmaned Aerial Vehicles: Drones

1669 words - 7 pages ground-based thermal imager to detect an indoor marijuana growing operation by measuring the temperature of the roof and outside wall of a house. Writing for the Court in Kyllo v. United States, Justice Antonin Scalia expressed concerns about the government collecting and analyzing information “emanating from a house” would put people “at the mercy of advancing technology – including imaging technology that could discern all human activity in

Ruling of Gitmo Detainees

858 words - 3 pages should use in determining questions of doubt (Waxman). The biggest quagmire concerning the issue is that the enemy may benefit from the court proceeding while the government is trying to prove the reasoning behind an enemy combatant’s detention. Because much of the information the government uses for detention is classified, presenting it before a defendant’s attorney can result in more harm than good. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia echoed

The Debate Over Capital Punishment

1196 words - 5 pages physiological deterrence against crime. Works Cited "Capital Punishment In the United States." Mar. 2011. Wikimedia Foundation, INC. 19 Oct. 2011. Carmical, Casey. "Capital Punishment is Morally Justified." Jan. 2010. Greenhaven Press. 18 Oct. 2011. Marquis, Joshua. "Capital Punishment is Administered Fairly." 2007. Current Controversies Series. 18 Oct. 2011. Scalia, Antonin G. "The

Do you think that it is morally acceptable to have preferential treatment programs for disabled veterans?

951 words - 4 pages white employees," since it did not require the discharge of white males and their replacement with members of underrepresented groups. Sandra Day O'Connor wrote a separate, more narrowly construed concurring opinion. (Lindsay 1989)Antonin Scalia, the newest justice on the Court, wrote a stinging dissent.The court today completes the process of converting [Title VII] from a guarantee that race or sex will not be the basis for employment

Capital Punishment

1506 words - 6 pages Capital Punishment First of all, capital punishment is constitutional. The 8th Amendment of the Constitution prohibits the use of "cruel and unusual punishments;" however, the death penalty does not fall under those prohibited punishments. According to Justice Antonin Scalia in a concurring opinion of Callins v. Collins in 1994, "The (5th Amendment) clearly permits the death penalty to be imposed and establishes beyond doubt that the death

Similar Essays

Antonin Scalia (1936 ) Essay

565 words - 2 pages previously held by William Rehnquist ascended to the position of chief justice. Antonin Scalia is sometimes referred to as the first chief justice of Italian-American descent, but he is also known as the first Roman Catholic to be appointed to the nation's highest court since William J. Brennan. Scalia, an outspoken conservative, showed himself eager to overrturn recent liberal precedents, and with Rehnquist along with Clarence Thomas, elected

Interpretation Of The U.S. Constitution Essay

1304 words - 5 pages The Constitution of the United States is a complex idea, adopted at a fragile time in American history and is the framework for our government systems. There are different ways to view this document and different ways to interpret it, which can cause debate over the proper and correct way to go about interpretation. Justice Antonin Scalia and former Justice William Brennan, are two intellectuals with different methods and ideas about the

Constitutional Corrections Essay

1036 words - 5 pages as it did back then. On the other hand, there are people who believe that the current laws of the Constitution should be interpreted the same way as the original. An example of textualism would be the Supreme Court Antonin Scalia, and the original Supreme Court Justice Stephen Boyer. So in this paper, I am comparing and contrast these judges’ arguments of textualism, to decipher which one is correct. The first article to be contrasted is written

Interpreting The Constitution Essay

1707 words - 7 pages Justice Stephen Boyer. In this paper, I am comparing and contrast, both of these judges to determine which person and their argument is right. The first article that I am contrasting is called: A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law by Antonin Scalin. In this article, Scalia defines and defends the concept of texualism, or the belief that a text “should be construed reasonably, to contain all that it fairly means.” Scalia insists