This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Juvenile Homicide Offenders Essay

1465 words - 6 pages

Throughout our world children are looked at as angles. What about the children that are said to be evil? Are they truly evil or is there something that triggers these acts and allows for the belligerence to be seen. Juvenile homicide offenders can be described as anyone under the age of 18 who is responsible for the murder of another human being. Many cases can show different aspects about the child’s brain and the way they may commit such a crime. Carl Newton Mahan, Robert Thompson and John Venable, are three of the youngest offenders in our history. Children’s brains are not fully developed and don’t occupy a full understanding of consequences (Children who kill: personality patterns are identified, New York Times.) The way the system deals with juvenile homicide cases is very complicated and in most cases it is very easy to try these offenders as adults (Why do kids commit murder, Everyday Phycology.)
Thousands of juvenile homicide cases exist in today’s world. But the hardest to understand are the ones that involve such young children. Carl Newton Mahan killed his eight year old friend May 18th, 1929 in Kentucky after the two boys had been fighting over a piece of scrap metal they had planned to sell for money (10 youngest murderers in history, Criminal Justice Degree Guide.) At the time Carl was six, when the fighting began Carl hit his friend over the head and continued to tow him to his home and threatened to shoot Cecil (his friend) if he did not give him the piece of scrap metal (10 youngest murderers in history, Criminal Justice Degree Guide.) When the boy didn’t let go Carl ended the eight year old boys life. Carl was sentenced to 15 years in reform school but was let off to remain with his parents (Kentucky six year old tried for murder, The Cincinnati Enquirer.) Two ten year old boys abducted and killed a two year old boy after leading him away from his mother in a shopping mall. The two boys, named Robert Thompson and Jon Venables lead the toddler 2.5 miles away from Liverpool to a set of railroad tracks where they began to torture James Bulger (the two year old) (Kentucky six year old tried for murder, The Cincinnati Enquirer.) The two year olds autopsy showed skull fracture from blunt trama to the head and signs of sexual abuse (Kentucky six year old tried for murder, The Cincinnati Enquirer.) The boys body was left across the tracks to be cut in half by a passing train. Video images captured the young boys abduction from the mall and allowed for police to find and arrest the two boys for the criminal act (Kentucky six year old tried for murder, The Cincinnati Enquirer.) In another case, mother Kathleen Grossett-Tate was babysitting her kids when she left 12-year-old Tate and 6-year-old Eunick to play unsupervised. Kathleen stood upstairs preparing for her grade yard shift for as a Florida State Trooper (Leniency for Lionel Tate?, ABC news.) After the two children had been playing for a while the 12 year old boy ran to his...

Find Another Essay On Juvenile Homicide Offenders

juveniles who kill Essay

1980 words - 8 pages common weapon used in juvenile homicide cases are firearms (Puzzannchera, Chamberlin & Kang, 2013). 72 percent of male offenders and 38 percent of female delinquents use firearm while committing homicide (Puzzannchera et al., 2013). Gun use in homicide cases is very common among boys and girls because 83% of their victims are male (the reason will be discussed in the later section) (Puzzannchera et al., 2013). Heide and Petee (2007) explained adults

Sentencing of Juveniles Essay

2558 words - 10 pages . Presently, our nation is under a presidential administration that strongly advocates the death penalty, including the execution of juveniles. The media and supporters of capital punishment warn of the "superpredator," the juvenile with no fear, remorse, or conscience. Opponents of this view encourage the idea that another death is only revenge, not deterrence. We will examine the rights allotted to juvenile offenders, and the punishments inflicted

Comparing crime 'myths' and 'facts'

1615 words - 6 pages community although no statistical evidence is shown in any of these articles. Research has shown that juveniles commit minimal violent crimes although the media gives the impression that it is otherwise. Mukherjee, Carcach & Higgins (1997, pp.18, 19) reports that of the queensland juvenile offenders between 1991 to 1996 only 9% included violent crimes (see Figure 1.1 below). Violent crimes were categorised as homicide, serious assault, common

Juvenile Crime

2537 words - 10 pages . (1996). Youth Gun Violence in Boston: Gun Markets, Serious Youth Offenders, and a Use Reduction Strategy. Kids & violence, a resource guide. Loper, A., & Cornell, D.G. (1996). Homicide by adolescent girls. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 323-336. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (1996). Prevision and parity: girls in juvenile justice. Washington, D.C.: Author

Bullycide: A Cause and Effect

1056 words - 4 pages all as a result of bullying. Unfortunately these crimes are steadily increasing. The key to putting an end to juvenile homicide is to put an end to bullying. Works Cited Hoover, John H., and Richard J. Hazier. Bullies and Victims. 3. 25. 1991. 212-219. Print. Khan, Huma. "Juvenile Justice: Too Young for Life in Prison?."ABC News. ABC, 12 July 2010 Web. 16 Jan 2012.

Mandatory Life without Parole for Juveniles

1997 words - 8 pages policy.Context and Importance of the ProblemAlmost everyone would agree that children are the core of our future. Therefore, it is imperative that we have laws/policies in place that will protect them from cruel and unusual punishment in any capacity. However, much debate continues to arise concerning mandatory life in prison without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders. In attempting to change a social policy concerning the juvenile justice

The Canadian Juvenile Justice System

1131 words - 5 pages opposite. People doubted the efficiency and severity of the justice system. For example, juvenile offenders committing a homicide might only face three year sentence. But most people believe that the youth retribution should be heavier, like a long-term imprisonment, producing a powerful deterrent against youth's behaviour. On the other hand, people also worried about the counter-productive of the act. Young people arrested frequently might cause

Adolescent Crime a Result of Socioeconomic Instabilities

1397 words - 6 pages ” (Hansen 2001). If studies such as these, becoming more common, are to be believed, then it becomes clear that trying juveniles is only a temporary solution to a long-term problem. Cognitive restructuring should be the first priority for youth offenders, as this may be the only time where such a pursuit will reap any positive benefits. With regard to juvenile offenders, what should the overall goal of imprisonment be? For adult offenders

Youth and the Law

1683 words - 7 pages Young offenders are persons under the age of 18, who are convicted for a criminal offence. The Juvenile Delinquents Act was made in 1908 and active until 1984. The Young Offenders Act was made in 1984 and active until 2002. The Youth Criminal Justice Act was made in 2002 as a replacement for the Young Offenders Act, which set out the process for responding to young offenders. These three famous young criminals were convicted of murder and tried

History of the Juvenile Justice System

3102 words - 12 pages viewed the juvenile offenders as adolescents in need of care and direction, not punishment (Myers, 2008). In In re Gault (1967), Justice Fortas summed up the views of the child savers: “The early reformers were horrified by adult procedures and penalties, and by the fact that children could be given long prison sentences and thrown in jails with toughened criminals. They were overwhelmingly convinced that society's duty to the child could not be

Should Juveniles be tried as Adults?

2023 words - 9 pages Each year thousands of teenagers are tried in the adult justice system in the United States. Due to the rise of teenage homicide and teenage crime rate in the 1980s, all states have made it easier to try underage age offenders as adults. California Proposition 21 passed in 2000 gave larger sentences to youth offenders and sent many to be tried in the adult justice system. Proposition 21 increased sentences for gang related crimes, death penalty

Similar Essays

Juvenile Homicide Can Be Prevented Essay

2365 words - 9 pages Introduction For every 12 homicides committed in the United States 1 of them involves a juvenile offender (Howard N. Snyder, Juvenile Offenders and Victims, 2006). Although most American don’t realize it, juvenile homicide is a problem in the United States that needs to be fixed. Even though statistics show that the homicide rate done by juveniles is at its lowest rate since the early 1980’s it is still a problem. Juvenile homicide has lowered

The United States Juvenile Justice System

868 words - 3 pages Originally, the juvenile court was thought of as a social service organization that dealt with protecting and solving the problems of children in trouble. The primary role of the juvenile court was not to establish guilt but rather to rehabilitate youthful offenders by eliminating the problem causing the juvenile to engage in delinquent behavior. Emphasis was placed on rehabilitation, attention and education and these beliefs became the basis of

A Bad Decision Essay

843 words - 4 pages Young teenagers don’t realize the trouble they can get into when they don’t consider their behaviors. Juvenile offenders do not measure the consequences of committing a crime and how a bad decision will dramatically change their lives, as well. I think juvenile offenders should not be sentence nor tried as adults because of their young age and their lack of maturity. One reason, why I think juvenile offenders should not be tried as an adult is

Life Without Parole For Juveniles Essay

943 words - 4 pages Supreme Court ruling Graham v. Florida (2010) banned the use of life without parole for juveniles who committed non-homicide crimes, and Roper v. Simmons (2005) abolished the use of the death penalty for juvenile offenders. They both argued that these sentences violated the 8th Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. While these landmark cases made great strides for the rights of minors passing through the criminal justice