Kant And Mac Intyre: What Determines Morality?

1960 words - 8 pages

Can one be moral by merely attempting to be moral? Or must one adhere to strict moral laws at all times in order to be truly moral? Two philosophies on this issue come from Immanuel Kant's writings in "Good Will, Duty, and the Categorical Imperative" and Alasdair MacIntyre's writings in "Tradition and the Virtues". The Kantian approach to morals is one of law. He states:The pre-eminent good which we call moral can therefore consist in nothing else then the conception of law in itself, which certainly is not only possible in a rational being, in so far as this conception, and not the expected effect, determines the will (Kant 167).There are undeniable rules of morality that dictate our actions. To be moral, these laws must be followed always, and not based on the consequences, but on the soul fact of whether or not it can be applicable to all. MacIntyre's works, on the other hand, talk of duty and obligations based on history and roles. It is from the histories and social obligations that a person's morality is shaped. It is the mere attempt to be moral that brings someone to the greater good in life, and it thus makes them a moral being. Both philosophers are convincing in their arguments: Kant's idea of universal laws and MacIntyre's idea "of quest for the good" are both appealing arguments (324). But even so, Kant's theory of universal laws also is not without flaws.According to Kant, moral worth is one of the most important characteristics that a person can possess. It is not merely enough to be intelligent, wise, caring, giving or anything else which traditionally defines someone as "good", instead one must "do right out of principle" (Kant 165). Kant believes that it is not simply enough to do something that is moral if it is done for gratification - it must be done simply because it is the moral law, and doing otherwise would be immoral. In his view there are certain universal principles that must be practiced in order to be considered moral, and can be applied to everyone. These universal principles are called "categorical imperatives" (Kant 165) that demand a certain action out of an individual. This type of imperative is unconditional, and must be followed at all times. The foundation of Kant's beliefs is that in order to truly be considered moral, an individual must do something based on these categorical imperatives. Kant states that, "...the moral worth of an action does not lie in the effect expected from it, nor in any principle of action which requires to borrow its motive from this expected effect" (Kant 167). The consequences of these actions should have no bearing on why the moral path is chosen. For example, suppose that a man were to find a woman's diamond ring, randomly on the side of the road. After his fortunate find, he then noticed that there were flyers that corresponded to that very ring, offering a reward on behalf of its return. This man has two options. He can either bring the ring back to its rightful owner, or her...

Find Another Essay On Kant and MacIntyre: What determines morality?

What determines who Jim and Huck are? Nature or Nurture

662 words - 3 pages good to help Jim. Huck's natural reasoning and his acquiescence to think through a situation on its own entitlement is what leads him to some conclusions that are right in their appurtenance but would clash society. An example is when he meets a group of slave-hunters, that telling a lie is sometimes the right course of action, in other words that sometimes lying is the right thing to do.Because Huck is a child, the world appears to be new to

Should morality be included as an essential part of law? At what point to do we draw the line between what is legally morally acceptable and what is not?

724 words - 3 pages Should morality be included as an essential part of law? At what point to do we draw the line between what is legally morally acceptable and what is not? The moral views of a society should be incorporated into the laws of society to a degree that represents the best interest of the people. It is far fetched to say that we should remove entirely moral views from our legal system, while on the other side of the spectrum it wouldn't seem right to

A Short History of Ethics

1276 words - 5 pages each state. What a Sophist must heed in one state may be completely different in another. With this, MacIntyre exposes the first flaw of Sophism: an individual has not been given a guide to the social conventions of a city-state, and therefore must adapt to the criteria of each state (16). The questions of social action and living need to be defined as non-moral or pre-moral; a tool branded as the natural man. MacIntyre provides the Sophistic

The Intentions and Consequences of an Action

1336 words - 6 pages situation. Even though there are various definitions for morality, it is still seen as the same thing in the end because it involves doing the right thing at any given time. After all, every decision boils down to the distinction between what people want to do and what they ought to do considering most people are willing to tolerate some pain, especially if they believe it will eventually lead to some pleasure. For example, university students will

Comparing David Hume and Immanuel Kant

1386 words - 6 pages other words just do the action out of duty, whether you want to or not. These views led to a set of guidelines or rules Hume and Kant believe governs moral worth or virtue. Hume and Kant devised a set of maxims or rules that determines the essence of moral worth or virtue. Hume believing that morality is founded in individual sentiment he concludes that there are four categories or qualities that constitute moral virtue: “(1) qualities useful to

Can Euthanasia Be Justified Morally?

1152 words - 5 pages "morality" in various ways. Aristotle posits that the highest good is always an end and not the means, whilst Hobbes and Locke refute this concept, stating that what is essentially deemed good is all relative to the desires of the agent (the individual or entity) (Macintyre 1996: 57-157). The universally agreed meaning of morality might never be achieved but we can all consent to the "good" being apparent in all that is presumed to be moral. Euthanasia

Moral Law According To Kant

553 words - 2 pages of the concepts of morality. Therefore, moral actions are thought to be exhibited only through this principle. Kant is not saying, however, that only morally good actions are free actions.      KantÕs view on morality and happiness, I believe are adequate for everybody. Kant believes that every man and woman are entitled to happiness, but without harming others. Everybody is obligated to creating a better world. Society in general needs to help each other and then themselves. MillÕs view of Òdo what feels goodÓ is not adequate for anyone. Every action must be done in a ethical matter, no matter the circumstance.

Separating Morality from Law

1055 words - 4 pages The idea of separating morality from law is problematic. Regardless of anyone’s desire to separate the two, it is impossible. All law is moral or, as the case may be, immoral. The real question of the law is what those morals are. Immanuel Kant seemed unable to define a universal moral, which he indeed tried to define. Kant defined it in three parts. These morals he used to explain the best regime and the duties of citizens within that

Kant's Categorical Imperative

1218 words - 5 pages universal law is twofold, not only does it sustain life, but also it promotes it to a higher level.The second part to Kant?s Categorical Imperative is the End that results from the primary principle of morality is humanity. The example of this is found in the quotation, ?Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means.? (Kant 36). What Kant

Kant's Humanity Formula

1632 words - 7 pages imperative”(Kant, 24). In other words, an imperative is something that a will ought or shall do because the will is obligated to act in a way in which conforms to moral law. Imperatives can also be referred to as the supreme principle of morality. According to Kant, there are two types of imperatives: hypothetical and categorical. Hypothetical imperatives are actions that look for the best means to a goal, however, the goal might not necessarily be

Book Report on Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals by Kant

846 words - 3 pages purposes in the Preface. First, he explains where the idea of morality fits into the three sciences, Physics, Ethics and Logic, of Greek philosophy. Morality the "laws by which everything out to happen"(Kant, 3) is the rational part of ethics. Kant is also careful to differentiate between rational and empirical laws. To Kant, morality can never be based on experience; it is always a priori. Morality exsisted before any event took place. Kant

Similar Essays

Morality Via Kant And Hegel Essay

1505 words - 6 pages rests on one of the most metaphysical and abstract explanations ever given for the common intuitions of morality (Scruton 2001, 73). With the metaphysical dual-ism claimed by his Transcendental Idealism as his cornerstone, Kant argued that Reason – to him a defining and immutable trait of human nature – allows for the derivation of formal and universally valid moral princip-les. His famous derivation of these, the Categorical Imperative, tantalizing

Kant And The Morality Of Anger

4129 words - 17 pages Kant and the Morality of Anger Introduction This essay does not comprise a defence of retributive punishment, neither does it imply a rejection of deterrent punishment. The writer suggests that one possible reason for the tendency to advocate punishment of offenders with ever increasing severity can be discovered in the concept of the 'morality of anger'. It is this explanation of the phenomenon that forms the principal burden of the

The Essay Deals With Kant And How His View On Rationailty Determine's His View On Morality, Referring To His Idea Of Duty

761 words - 3 pages For Kant, the best way to live is the morally good way. This is not because of morality's bestowal to happiness, but because of the intrinsic value and significance of morality.The basic principles of morality are principles of practical reason; and these basic principles of practical rationality are 'a priori': our wisdom of these principles is not based on empirical observation or experience. On the contrary, these principles are in some sense

What Do We Own The Animals And How And Why Do We Owe It To Them? Kant, Singer

542 words - 2 pages What do we own the animals and how and why do we owe it to them?According to Kant we do not owe animals anything as he puts it "Animals... are theremerely as a means to an end. That end is man."(emp130) I think the way he sees it isthat animals do not have the capacity to understand, to make reason. When a dog istaught something like not to urinate in the house, they understand that doing this will getthem in trouble, but do they really don't