Kant And Morality Essay

1706 words - 7 pages

Introduction
Many philanthropists come up with their own views and theories about many aspects of life and nature. The conception of happiness is one aspect of nature among human beings that attracted major views by philanthropists. Aristotle, Mill and Bentham are the most notable philanthropists who focused on what happiness is to human beings. Aristotle’s view on happiness is about the good ends that can be achieved from actions. Mills view on happiness is having pleasure and freedom from pain. This paper compares and contrasts Aristotle’s conception of happiness with that of Mill and Bentham. The paper concludes with establishing which concept on happiness, between Aristotle and Mill, is more convincing.
Aristotle’s View on Happiness
In the book Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle, every activity that a person does is usually aimed at some final result, which is considered a good aim (Aristotle 2; bk. 1). Human beings pursue ends for a certain goal that is taken as good. These ends can be products or activities. In most cases, products are usually considered better that the specific activities that produce them. Each and every action that is done usually has ends. For instance, the end of economic activities is wealth while the end medical art is health (Aristotle 2; bk. 1). These ends are examples of aims that have end results that are considered as good.
All human beings believe that the best thing, or the supreme good, in life is happiness. However, there is lots of disagreement on what comprises of happiness. Most people compare happiness with pleasure. However, different people have different views on what is good to them. Some people may take earning honors as their supreme good. However, honors are awarded to recognize goodness. Therefore, there appears to be greater good than honors. Nevertheless, the goods can give rise to problems that harm people. Men have commonly been undone by their own wealth while others have been undone by courage (Aristotle 2; bk. 1).
Happiness can be considered as the highest good. This is because happiness is chosen as an end that is sufficient. Every pursuit and all knowledge aims at some good (Aristotle 2; bk. 1). Thereby, intelligence and virtual may be considered as good by themselves and also because they bring happiness. More so, people can be perceived as good whenever they do their duties by using their knowledge wisely. A person who is perceived as good always behaves in a manner that is virtuous no matter the difficulties he or she may face at one point in life.
People tend to judge things by how they perceive them. A person who is educated in a certain subject can be a good judge in that specific subject (Aristotle 2; bk. 1). This shows that different people may judge different things differently. As such, something that is judged as good by one person may be judged as bad by another person. People may differ with respect to what happiness is (Aristotle 2; bk. 1). This demonstrates that what one...

Find Another Essay On Kant and Morality

The Morality of Lying in Contrast to the Philosophies of Kant

2329 words - 9 pages intentions for the night, despite her knowledge to the contrary. Now, the result of this situation is (typically) one of excitement, joy, and contentment. Very rarely is there any real animosity or harm, so it would not be irrational to state that the lies involved in maintaining the integrity of the surprise are not inherently immoral. Indeed, Kant insists on serving the individual. The lies here service the entire assembled party in addition to

Moral Law According To Kant Essay

553 words - 2 pages . Most significantly, Kant renounces happiness as the principle of morality because it obliterates the specific difference between virtue and vices.      Universality is the form of a moral law whereby all rational beings are subject to the same condition as the basis of morality. Kant argues that there can be principles for action that do not admit of exceptions, and that this occurs through practical reason. In other words, the possibility for

Kant's Categorical Imperative

1218 words - 5 pages Kant?s Categorical Imperatives of the Fundamental Principle of Morality In section one of Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morality, Kant gives us five propositions that he holds to be our common understanding of morality. In the second section he outlines the Categorical Imperative of the fundamental principle of morality to show that it has a particular form and end to it. Kant uses this Categorical Imperative to show that the five examples of

Comparing David Hume and Immanuel Kant

1386 words - 6 pages Comparing David Hume and Immanuel Kant David Hume and Immanuel Kant each made a significant break from other theorists in putting forward a morality that doesn’t require a higher being or god, for a man to recognize his moral duty. Although Hume and Kant shared some basic principals they differed on their view of morality. In comparing the different views on human will and the maxims established to determine moral worth by David Hume and

The Intentions and Consequences of an Action

1336 words - 6 pages addition to Kant’s discussion of people’s character and their intentions, he created the categorical imperative as a way to illustrate his view of morality since he is not concerned with actions or the intended result (Kant, G.M.M. Sec. 2, p. 26). In other words, Kant is more concerned with the obligations that people have towards each other because he views helping others as being superior to improving the self. For instance, some people seem

Book Report on Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals by Kant

846 words - 3 pages purposes in the Preface. First, he explains where the idea of morality fits into the three sciences, Physics, Ethics and Logic, of Greek philosophy. Morality the "laws by which everything out to happen"(Kant, 3) is the rational part of ethics. Kant is also careful to differentiate between rational and empirical laws. To Kant, morality can never be based on experience; it is always a priori. Morality exsisted before any event took place. Kant

Kant on the Locus of the Moral Worth and Utility

930 words - 4 pages one, is required to act on the maxim. Goodwill should be treated as a universal law and every individual has to act on it. Conferring to Kant’s adage, actions that always emerge from the act of goodwill are always a responsibility that anyone is required to accomplish. Anything done to achieve the positive benefit has got no any moral value in it. Denis in his article Kant and Hume on Morality argues that Kant’s emphasis on the need for

Immanuel Kant

1773 words - 7 pages , the originality and uniqueness of Kant's ethical theory is clear from his `Copernican revolution' which includes freedom, autonomy and heteronomy. An understanding of how Kant distinguishes between autonomy and heteronomy helps one in realizing the uniqueness of Kant's ethical theory. "For Kant the term "autonomy" denoted our ability and responsibility to know what morality requires of us and to act accordingly. In a

essay

1274 words - 6 pages had the right to choose if blacks were to be slaves or not. This demonstrates that Douglas speech was also meant to separate politics and morality since his ideals removed the moral condemnation of slavery by its efforts to spread slavery over the new territories of the United States. Therefore, Douglas satisfies Kant’s definitive criteria for perpetual peace. According to Kant, no treaty of peace shall be made if it leaves space for future wars

Immanuel Kant: A Philosopher Who Influenced Society

1018 words - 4 pages quickly as I did with the attractive clerk. Another of Kant works is the theory of Law. It’s helpful to justify the concept that Kant stated that “a good will is essentially good; its value is wholly self-contained and utterly independent of its external relations.” Since it’s appropriate to the development and guidance of a good will than the values and morals of the person view will be acceptable. In his view of morality, self-interest and duty

Kant's Perspective on Crime, Punishment, and Justice

1818 words - 7 pages contains many valuable ideas, however there are many flaws about his theory as well. A good thing about Kant’s doctrine is that fact that he focuses and develops a system for determining his morality, which is the Categorical Imperative. The Categorical Imperative is the idea that “we should not treat other rational beings as mere means to our own purposes” (Sparknotes, 2012). In other words, Kant believes that it is never right to use individuals

Similar Essays

Morality Via Kant And Hegel Essay

1505 words - 6 pages rests on one of the most metaphysical and abstract explanations ever given for the common intuitions of morality (Scruton 2001, 73). With the metaphysical dual-ism claimed by his Transcendental Idealism as his cornerstone, Kant argued that Reason – to him a defining and immutable trait of human nature – allows for the derivation of formal and universally valid moral princip-les. His famous derivation of these, the Categorical Imperative, tantalizing

Kant And Mac Intyre: What Determines Morality?

1960 words - 8 pages else then the conception of law in itself, which certainly is not only possible in a rational being, in so far as this conception, and not the expected effect, determines the will (Kant 167).There are undeniable rules of morality that dictate our actions. To be moral, these laws must be followed always, and not based on the consequences, but on the soul fact of whether or not it can be applicable to all. MacIntyre's works, on the other hand, talk

Kant And The Morality Of Anger

4129 words - 17 pages Kant and the Morality of Anger Introduction This essay does not comprise a defence of retributive punishment, neither does it imply a rejection of deterrent punishment. The writer suggests that one possible reason for the tendency to advocate punishment of offenders with ever increasing severity can be discovered in the concept of the 'morality of anger'. It is this explanation of the phenomenon that forms the principal burden of the

The Essay Deals With Kant And How His View On Rationailty Determine's His View On Morality, Referring To His Idea Of Duty

761 words - 3 pages For Kant, the best way to live is the morally good way. This is not because of morality's bestowal to happiness, but because of the intrinsic value and significance of morality.The basic principles of morality are principles of practical reason; and these basic principles of practical rationality are 'a priori': our wisdom of these principles is not based on empirical observation or experience. On the contrary, these principles are in some sense