This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

1531 words - 6 pages

Kant's Categorical Imperative

Deontology is the ethical view that some actions are morally forbidden or permitted regardless of consequences. One of the most influential deontological philosophers in history is Immanuel Kant who developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Kant believed that the only thing of intrinsic moral worth is a good will. Kant says in his work Morality and Rationality “The good will is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes or because of it’s adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of it’s willing, i.e., it is good of itself”. A maxim is the generalized rule that characterizes the motives for a person’s actions. For Kant, a will that is good is one that is acting by the maxim of doing the right thing because it is right thing to do. The moral worth of an action is determined by whether or not it was acted upon out of respect for the moral law, or the Categorical Imperative. Imperatives in general imply something we ought to do however there is a distinction between categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives are obligatory so long as we desire X. If we desire X we ought to do Y. However, categorical imperatives are not subject to conditions. The Categorical Imperative is universally binding to all rational creatures because they are rational. Kant proposes three formulations the Categorical Imperative in his Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Moral, the Universal Law formulation, Humanity or End in Itself formulation, and Kingdom of Ends formulation. In this essay, the viablity of the Universal Law formulation is tested by discussing two objections to it, mainly the idea that the moral laws are too absolute and the existence of false positives and false negatives.

The first formulation of the Categorical Imperative is defined by Kant to "act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”. Good moral actions are those of which are motivated by maxims which can be consistently willed that it’s generalized form be a universal law of nature. These maxims are otherwise known as universilizable maxims. Maxims can then be put through the Categorical Imerative test to determine their universilisablility and thus the premissability the maxim. To test a maxim we must ask ourselves whether we can consistently will for a maxim to be obeyed by everyone all the time. If we can, then the act is permissable but if we will inconsistently then the maxim is not universalisable and the act is forbidden. There are two ways to we can will inconsistently, either the generalized maxim is logically impossible or that what we will contradicts another of our wills. An example of a maxim which would not pass the Categorical Imperative test would be : “Whenever anyone wants money they will make a false promise, borrow the money and never pay the lender back.” This generalized maxim cannot be universalized...

Find Another Essay On Kant's Categorical Imperative

Kant's Critique of Utilitarianism and a Maxim put through the categorical Imperative

544 words - 3 pages Kant's critique of Utilitarianism is that it treats people as a means not as an ends in themselves. Since he is a deontologist he presumes that there is a universal moral imperative, certain ways in which we must act, no matter what our individual desires or needs or utility might be. The Categorical Imperative is an idea of reason. This knowledge is not derived from experience but rather, it is a priori. It also binds us and we all act in a

Kant's Categorical Imperative in Grounding for the Metephysics of Morals

1436 words - 6 pages In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant first introduces his concept of the categorical imperative (CI) as an unconditional moral law. In this paper I will argue that Kant’s categorical imperative succeeds in proving that lying and murder are immoral. First, I will explain moral law and the categorical imperative, and then I will outline Kant’s Formula of Universal Law. Finally, I will evaluate two maxims to determine if the

Kants Fundamental Principles Of The Metaphysics Of Moral

744 words - 3 pages Kant's Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Moral The central concept of Kant's Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals is the categorical imperative. “The conception of an objective principle, in so far as it is obligatory for a will, is called a command (of reason), and the formula of the command is called an Imperative.” (Abbott, 30) An imperative is something that a will ought or shall do because the will is obligated

Kant's caterogorical imperative. Discription of how the c.i works

799 words - 3 pages The central concept of Kant's Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals is the categorical imperative. "The conception of an objective principle, in so far as it is obligatory for a will, is called a command (of reason), and the formula of the command is called an Imperative." (Abbott, 30) An imperative is something that a will ought or shall do because the will is obligated to act in the manner in which it conforms with moral law. The

Kant and the Categorical Imperative

1651 words - 7 pages great deal of stress placed on the intention behind the act, consider giving money to charity for the sake of helping out, without any need for any ego gratification or such self-serving purposes, this is an instance of "good will".Kant's most well known contribution to ethical discussion is the categorical imperative. There are three key propositions that form the basis of Kant's ethics. They are: act only on that maxim (principle) through which you

Philosophy: Emmanuel Kant

1137 words - 5 pages time will that it should become a universal law" ( Kant's examples). This is also believed that "four virtues have been considered foundational or cardinal for all other virtues for that are pointed out to be temperance, courage, justice, and prudence" ( Kant's examples) The second statement that follows the categorical imperative are treat all persons, including oneself, as wends and never as means only( RAE)". In contrast, for Kant the good

Kant’s Moral Philosophy in Readdressing the Is-Ought Problem

1558 words - 7 pages necessary means to the end he wills, and the commands of the CAtegorical Imperative are simply the constraints he himself adopts as a rational and autonomous person. To put the point paradoxically, we could summarize the demands of practical reason by saying, "Do what you will (Hill 450).” Representing a kind of action as fundamentally practically necessary, Kant's categorical imperative is the formula of a principle of choice. Hypothetically

Mill and Kant's Efforts to Solve an Ethical Dilemma

1373 words - 6 pages similar manner. Kantian moral theory is an example of a deontological ethical theory where the moral worth of an action is determined by dedication to moral duty (Wood 31). In choosing whether to use the money to support family or to donate to a veteran’s association, John needs to consider his duty to society as well as duty to family. Kant proposes the categorical imperative as a command that ascertains moral duties irrespective of the

Rousseau and Kant on Law

1007 words - 4 pages Kant and Rousseau share many similar viewpoints regarding how laws should be created, but when it comes to the concept of law itself, they differ greatly. Both Rousseau and Kant agree that laws which are agreed by everyone within the state are the only which can be bound to. However they take very different paths in order to reach this agreement. Kant's universal law is his categorical imperative, whereas Rousseau's uses his general law in his

What is the Connection between Kant's View on Suicide and his Understanding of the Moral Law?

871 words - 3 pages self-preservation.For all the reasons given in Kant's formulation of the categorical imperative, suicide could not be a categorical imperative, but a hypothetical imperative. This means you would not be acting out of duty but only as a way of achieving something else which, according to Kant, goes against our reasoning and against our duties so would not be a moral action. Judged against the categorical imperative and Kant's notion of duty, his ideas on suicide fit in well with his moral law.

Kant's Categorical Argument

1679 words - 7 pages Kant's Categorical Argument Emanuel Kant was a German Philosopher who lived in the late 18th century and was arguably one of the greatest thinkers of all time. He came up with a guide to morals in direct opposition to the ontological theory. Many people use his ethics as a guide to living a moral life. The topic I shall be discussing is Kant's categorical imperative and the utilitarian's greatest happiness idea. There

Similar Essays

Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

851 words - 3 pages Immanuel Kant claims that moral judgments must be based on the categorical imperative. He argues for this claim by first exploring the characteristics of human decisions and actions that would make them distinctly moral. He then argues that the only principle of action that adequately accounts for these characteristics is the categorical imperative. I shall discuss Kant's argument by first explaining the characteristics that he thinks make

Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

1304 words - 5 pages reason should be inclined to do so. It is man's duty to assist others in need based purely on the self-preserving principle of survival. If individuals in society never helped each other, than no one would ever be able to find assistance in a time of need.Kant also comes up with several formulations of the categorical imperative. As stated earlier, Kant's first formulation of the categorical imperative is that man should only act in a manner such

Analysis Of Kant's Categorical Imperative

2079 words - 8 pages owing to that his theory is founded on purely idealism. Mistakes in categorical imperative reveal the inherent contradiction of Kant's theory of motivation. Therefore, from the perspective of categorical imperative and its content and logic, we can better understand Kant's moral thoughts. I. Categorical imperative and its testimony Categorical imperative is a basic concept in Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. Yet, what does categorical

Kant's Categorical Imperative Essay

1218 words - 5 pages Kant?s Categorical Imperatives of the Fundamental Principle of Morality In section one of Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morality, Kant gives us five propositions that he holds to be our common understanding of morality. In the second section he outlines the Categorical Imperative of the fundamental principle of morality to show that it has a particular form and end to it. Kant uses this Categorical Imperative to show that the five examples of