This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Kantian Morality Of Action Essay

1062 words - 4 pages

Fatma Nur Koçak 21001447 PHIL244-2 Essay 1st Question: Case Evaluation: 12 Years a Slave
In the book "Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals", Kant questions the morality of an action. He questions the moral bases of actions as well as how one should behave according to which principles. His ethical theory is based on the duty principle which is basically based on the argument that what makes an action good or bad is the intention, in other words the good will, behind it. An action is good or morally wrong if the action is made by the good will. An action is bad or morally wrong if the action is made by bad will or not good will. The consequence of the action is not regarded, main point is the intention. This intention is born by the duty which is a collective summary of human reason. Whether the consequences harmful or good for the society, if one act is duty, one should act in the certain way without considering the end. Ultimate goal is following the duty. Kantian ethics frame that how people should act with which motivation. The duty principle he argues has both pros and cons in terms of universality. On the one hand, consistency in the following duty is the pro part of the theory; on the other hand, absolutist standing and too narrowed point of view are the cons of the Kantian ethical theory.Concurrency is one of the strong principles Kantian ethic follows. The base of the Kantian ethic is the going after the duty consistently. The given worth to an action comes from its accordance with the duty one has. There are two kinds of duties, perfect and imperfect duties. It is people's duty to never tell a lie, always saying the truth. It is regarded as perfect duty. According to Kant, perfect duties contract the core principles of universal moral principles. In the case, as a devout Kantian, woman should tell the truth and hand the escaper in the police soldiers. It is what ought to be done. It is the perfect duty of a moral person. One should behave according to the duty in order to live in a morally straight system. If she will not act morally according to Kantian principles, she will break the universality principle of the maxim. The duty is "One should not tell a lie.", the maxim is "Never tell a lie.", the universal law is "None must not tell a lie.". Again when we think about the case, woman must tell the truth in favor the duty. No matter the consequence would be, the only consideration woman should be the duty. Instead of the telling truth, telling the lie was the duty of the woman, it would be universalized in theory and give harm to current moral system. Justification of the slavery is open to discussion, however if the slavery is a legal norm for the society, It is the reasonable act to tell the truth and to give the guilty person to police soldiers which is based on duty. To sum up, morally right act is foreseen by the duty.In same context, Kant disregards the circumstances...

Find Another Essay On Kantian Morality of Action

Ehtics in ABC Corporation Essay

1180 words - 5 pages , but the project has not gone live. Billy and his team are using Tommy and the company as a means to his and his team ends. However, the Kantian approach relies on the categorical imperative because Kant believed humans should be based on morality. Under the Kantian approach, it is unethical for Tommy to fire Billy and 30 of his people for delaying “Pegasus,” over budget, and errors on the report. As this approach getting too over our decisions

Kantian Ethics vs. Utilitarianism Essay

1184 words - 5 pages situation. Both of these Philosophers are mostly concern with principal of individual action, which is our intent or our acts in general. The difference between them is whether these acts are either right or wrong. While Mill focuses on the consequences of actions, Kant does not, and puts more emphasis on our actions. 1.     To fully explain Onora O’neil’s argument for preferring Kantian ethics to Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism And Kantian Ethics

1178 words - 5 pages impermissible.      The differences in the Utilitarianism and the Kantian views are as different as night and day. Utilitarianism philosophy is that any act can be morally justified if the motive is intended to be for the greater good, but the Kantian theory states that the morality of an act is based on the consequences of that action. In examining the following situation one can obtain an idea of what side to take: A woman

Kantian Ethics

1698 words - 7 pages that young children will learn to make logical decisions that would contribute in a positive way in society. An ethical theory that would best describe people that influence young children would be Kantian`s ethics. His ethical theory elucidates that morality is when we act based on duty for duty`s sake not for self-interest. For this reason in order to respect the law, a sense of duty to one`s actions is necessary (Kant, 287). Based on this

Exploring Whether All Morality Should Reduce to Respecting Autonomy

1684 words - 7 pages Kantian Ethics states that all morality can be reduced to respecting autonomy. This theory has faced criticisms as well as support. Its most plausible idea is that autonomous agents are capable of making their own decisions and even if their choices may not be the best for them, these choices should be respected. However, criticisms of this theory include concerns such as 1) respecting autonomy is not equivalent to respecting the autonomous

Tom and Mary

1726 words - 7 pages with the FUL can be addressed and possibly avoided. In conclusion, Kantian deontology is more useful than the GHP when deciphering between moral and immoral actions. John Stuart Mill’s GHP defines morality as seeking out the greatest pleasure for the greatest number of people while Kantian Deontology is more concerned with the intentions of an action rather than the consequences. The intentions of the action must be willed to be good. If the

Kantian Morality

1056 words - 4 pages , universal morality.      The main issue with these objections seems to be that Kant's theory breaks down to some extent in certain situations. However, it becomes possible that by further analyzing the situation at hand, certain allowances can be made. Perhaps then the most convincing argument for the theory is that on a day-to-day basis. Kantian Ethics provides a method for deciding the best and most moral course of action. Perhaps this is the purpose of moral theory in the first place.      

Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism

1395 words - 6 pages weighed and alternatives proposed before deciding whether or not to perform such an action. Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are similar in the respect that they both attempt to explain how one can go about acting ethically, however they differ in areas of measuring morality and their usage of rules. Both Kant and Mills measure morality in different ways. Kantianism says that an act is deemed moral for two reasons: if it done for the sake

Utilitarianism V. Kantianism

1360 words - 5 pages to perform such an action. Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are similar in the respect that they both attempt to explain how one can go about acting ethically, however they differ in areas of measuring morality and their usage of rules. Both Kant and Mills measure morality in different ways. Kantianism says that an act is deemed moral for two reasons: if it done for the sake of duty and if its maxim can be willed as a universal law. If

Kantian Morality

1063 words - 4 pages Kantian Morality Kant's theory of morality seems to function as the most feasible in determining one's duty in a moral situation. The basis for his theory is perhaps the most noble of any-- acting morally because doing so is morally right. His ideas, no matter how occasionally vague or overly rigid, work easily and efficiently in most situations. Some exceptions do exist, but the strength of those exceptions may be somewhat diminished by looking

Contrasting Kand and Hume on Morality

1852 words - 8 pages Morality is central to all rational beings, whereby a moral action is one determined by reason, rather than our personal desires as suggested by Kant (1785) in contrast to Hume. (1738). Furthermore, Kant suggests that an action is moral only on account of its being reasoned, therefore the moral worth of an action is determined by its motives and not by its consequences. Exploring the works of Hume (1738) and Kant(1785) on morality and ethics, we

Similar Essays

A Critique Of The Categorical Imperative

1890 words - 8 pages ideas solely on a deontological perspective. Teleological ethicists argue that the morality of an action is wholly dependent on the outcome of the aforementioned action. While virtue ethicists argue how the inherent characteristics of the individual rather than anything else matters when evaluating ethical behaviours. According to Kantian view, both these are inherently flawed as they rely on making morality subjective rather than objective, and to

Is It Morally Permissible To Abort A Living Fetus

975 words - 4 pages life of a human. Nevertheless, in both situations under these circumstances, aborting the baby would decrease pain and increase happiness for the baby, the mother and the space exploration group. The opposing view on the subject is that from a Kantian deontological standpoint, one which puts emphasis on the duty of the individual in determining the moral worth of an action. In its most basic form when applied to this argument, the moral duty

Mill And Kant's Efforts To Solve An Ethical Dilemma

1373 words - 6 pages performer happy or not. In deciding the morality of John’s choices using the utilitarian approach, we first need to specify the options available to him. He can either use the money gained from the car sale to support his family of four or donate the money to a veteran’s association. We need to evaluate the consequences of each action and estimate the probability of each of the expected consequences (Wood 54). We should also assess the utility of

Kant On The Locus Of The Moral Worth And Utility

930 words - 4 pages admits that the goodwill can only be good if it is willing. According to Kantian Ethics: Good Will, It is Your Duty! Kant’s ethics moral are based on the unconditional command referred to as the Categorical Imperative. Therefore, Kant states that doing something because it creates a positive feeling of doing it does not make the action good. What matters is the attitude that one builds in doing the job. Kant claims that doing something out of