This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Kantianism And Act Utilitarianism Essay

1799 words - 7 pages

Both Kantianism and Act Utilitarianism attempt to define our creation of morality and the importance of individual actions. One important aspect of both ideals in philosophy is that of equality. In terms of ethics, in practice and in study, philosophers seek to understand what governs a persons decisions and what motivates them to make those decisions. Ultimately, any action has a positive or negative reaction. This is a simple scientific fact, yet it can be applied to anyone at any place or time. Given this theory, any action a person makes will (directly or indirectly) affect everyone else. This begs the question: How should a person act, and how will it affect not only their life, but the life of everyone else (through the repercussions of their original action). Many philosophers preach about the pursuit of happiness, because let's face it, everyone wants to be happy. But, in this simple want or need, lies a conflict of desires. With the millions of people on this earth, how can one person expect to act in a beneficial manner for both themselves and the world around them? Everyone is different. It is a basic fact of life, something that we learn at an early age. There are different levels of poverty, well-being, etc. The only way that people will truly act beneficially to themselves and others is through equality. No one is truly satisfied unless situations are fair, just and equal. If one group (or even one person) has more power, money, or opportunities, it is natural to assume that the less fortunate would feel unequal, and eventually would act upon their unrest. So, for everyone to be truly happy, everything would have to be equal. There would be no greed, since everyone would have the same amount of money, and assumedly all other "power-struggle" problems would be eliminated. However, it is illogical to assume that everyone can be given the same opportunities, gain the same amount of experience, wealth, and knowledge, at least in the society we live in today. Instead, the best situation, and the moral and ethical choice a man or woman can make is to treat everyone equally. This not only applies to day to day life, but in every decision and action a person may make. Both Kantianism and Act Utilitarianism focus on morality through equality, and the decision-making processes involved with the two theories. In this paper I will explore the positive and negative aspects of Act Utilitarianism and Kantianism, and explain through discussions of both methods of philosophical thought, why Kantianism better illustrates the importance and value of equality in every action and for every individual.Utilitarianism is a theory of morality, in which decisions and actions are supposed to be based upon the total happiness it creates for the most people (which, theoretically implies in one way or another, everyone in the world). This applies twofold with regard to individual actions, as well as the laws a society creates for its people. Jeremy Bentham is...

Find Another Essay On Kantianism and Act Utilitarianism

Explain the Main difference between Act and Rule Utilitarianism (it can also be used to explain the main difference between Bentham and Mill)

2697 words - 11 pages John Stuart Mill have become recognised as the two greatest sponsors of Utilitarianism. Bentham is known for his popularisation of the more traditional version of the theory, know as Act Utilitarianism. Although a student of Bentham, Mill could see problems in what he was being taught and so began to develop his own views on Utilitarianism, which are now known as Rule Utilitarianism.Bentham was a great traditionalist believer in the expression

utilitarianism vs. kantianism Essay

691 words - 3 pages be assessed individually. In rule utilitarianism, the act itself is not the main concern, but the idea that moral rules that bring about the “greatest good” for all should be applied. While utilitarianism utilizes a consequentialist or teleological approach, Kantianism provides a vastly different perspective on ethics and morality (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2011). Kantianism poses a different view in that it does not concern itself with the

Political Philosophy: Kant's Hypothesis

1115 words - 4 pages , while defective obligations are those that one must perform just when the circumstances emerges. Utilitarianism is an alternate hypothesis in which its principle goal is to clarify the way of morals and ethical quality. Utilitarianism is a moral hypothesis which is based upon utility, or doing that which generates the best joy. As indicated by an utilitarian the ethical quality of act is discovered simply if the result prepares the best

Utilitarianism vs. Kantianism

1395 words - 6 pages weighed and alternatives proposed before deciding whether or not to perform such an action. Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are similar in the respect that they both attempt to explain how one can go about acting ethically, however they differ in areas of measuring morality and their usage of rules. Both Kant and Mills measure morality in different ways. Kantianism says that an act is deemed moral for two reasons: if it done for the sake

Kantian Ethics vs. Utilitarianism

1184 words - 5 pages 1.     Explain Onora O’neil’s argument for preferring Kantian ethics to Utilitarianism. 2.     How would Richard Taylor respond to O’neil’s defense of Kantianism? In the following questions, Onora O’neil defends Kantian ethics while Richard Taylor agrees more with the Utilitarian ethics view. To fully understand both views and why each author defends their view, a brief introduction of each

Utilitarianism V. Kantianism

1360 words - 5 pages to perform such an action. Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are similar in the respect that they both attempt to explain how one can go about acting ethically, however they differ in areas of measuring morality and their usage of rules. Both Kant and Mills measure morality in different ways. Kantianism says that an act is deemed moral for two reasons: if it done for the sake of duty and if its maxim can be willed as a universal law. If

Euthanasia: Kantianism vs Utilitarianism

1618 words - 6 pages people who care for the person are both happy and unhappy regardless of whether the person is dead or alive, but the person will only be happy if he/she is dead. Therefore, since euthanasia meets the moral standards set by Utilitarianism, it would support the act of euthanasia as a morally sound action.Unlike Utilitarianism however, Kantianism states that ethics is a purely a priori discipline, thus, independent of experience, and that ethical


1693 words - 7 pages being. As a result, Kant would consider lying to be immoral, even if it is done with good intentions. This is counter-intuitive, and it would seem that utilitarianism makes the most sense here. However, in spite of this conclusion reached, the right theory of morality is still Kantianism. Firstly, there are two issues with utilitarianism: the subjectivity related to measuring happiness (relatively minor), and also its dependence on prediction

What is Kanatianism Theory?

1897 words - 8 pages Utilitarianism, Act Utilitarianism is an ethical theory in contrast to both Rule Utilitarianism and Kantianism as Act Utilitarianism is based on producing the most happiness versus unhappiness through the principle of utility (Page 75…). For example, Act Utilitarianism comes into play whenever an individual is faced with a choice, he or she must first consider the likely consequences of their potential actions. More importantly, is to choose a belief that

comparing hobbes, locke and marx - humanlity - polictal

773 words - 4 pages greater number of people. There is also the distinction between act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism, but I won’t muddy the waters with the differences between those two. In any case, Kant’s view and utilitarianism presuppose a distinction between right and wrong, whereas a philosophy like Nietzsche’s immoralism would dispense with this distinction. The primary difference between Kant’s deontology (the fancy name for his ethical theory) and

effects of AI and AV on society - tcc - blog

576 words - 3 pages ). In construction of an AV the ethical theories I would end up encoding into the software would be utilitarianism, Kantianism and respect for persons. Utilitarianism focuses on a more pleasurable scenario. Since the main principle of utilitarianism is utility, the solution that produces the best outcome becomes favored. In an AV Utilitarianism could be used to ensure the least uneventful accident. If a case study scenario was presented of

Similar Essays

Kantianism And Utilitarianism In A Company´S Lay Off Procedure

1518 words - 6 pages other digital media (Encyclopaedia Britannica 2014). This makes the case of HP’s cloud system leading to unemployment as one of the sample cases of companies trimming down staff due to information systems. While some agree and others disagree on the question posed above, this question can actually be viewed from two different angles, based on ethical theories, namely in the Kantianism way and the Act Utilitarianism way.Kantianism and Act

Critisism For Rule And Act Utilitarianism

1379 words - 6 pages “Utilitarianism is the view that the supreme principle of morality is to act so as to produce as much happiness as possible, each person counting equally” (Mill, 114). By ‘happiness’, this includes anything that is pleasurable and free of pain. Simply put, utilitarianism is the theory that an action is right, as long as it produces the greatest good for the most number of people (Peetush). The central point to this theory is that one must

Utilitarianism: Founding Fathers, Strengths And Weaknesses Of Act Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism, Other Forms Of Utilitarianism, And Recent Philosophers

1528 words - 6 pages are harmonized with some major flaws. I will discuss the founding fathers of utilitarianism, the strengths and weaknesses of act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism, other forms of utilitarianism, and recent philosophers of this school of thought.This idea of the greatest good for the greatest number was developed by Jeremy Bentham. Although the ides of utilitarianism is often traced back to and credited to Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill

What's The Difference Between Act (Au) And Rule Utilitarianism (Ru)? What Are The Strengths And Weaknesses Of Each?

554 words - 3 pages What's the difference between act (AU) and ruleutilitarianism (RU)? What are the strengths andweaknesses of each?In the past Utilitarianism was judged on each individual action, after many years pastedthen Utilitarianism was judge on the consequences of the truth and a lie. Yourconsequences are judged on thoughts such as a promise you made or the truth you wastold. "The new version of the theory Rule Utilitarianism, which is distinguishing it