This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

King Henry Iv Essay

1164 words - 5 pages

Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part 1, opens in the royal palace in London, where King Henry IV of England is discussing the current state of his country with his councillors. In the three parts of his opening speech, King Henry IV discusses issues surrounding England's political strife and civil turmoil. Recognizing the explanation for the unrest as being his accession to the throne, Henry must face his opposition and attempt to reunite his troubled kingdom. Challenged with choices and decisions, King Henry reveals his intuitive solutions to resolve the instability. Closely emulating propaganda, this figurative passage uncovers King Henry IV's instinctive leadership qualities and his manipulative political strategy. As the play opens, the legitimacy of King Henry's rein is in question. The first part of Henry's speech reveals that England has become plagued with rebellion, treachery, and shifting alliances in the period following the deposition of King Richard II. Addressing Westmoreland and his counsellors, King Henry brings into perspective his guilt towards the crown and his concerns for England. The kingdom's recent instabilities have made him physically "shaken" and psychologically "wan" (l.1) and although he metaphorically reveals that he is exhausted like a horse in battle, Henry quickly shifts the tone of his speech to one full of strength and confidence. Aware of the civil conflicts occurring throughout his country, Henry recommences his speech by recounting the hardships surrounding his countries civil war. It is here we begin to identify components of propaganda in Henry's dissemination of information. His highly suggestive use of dark, figurative language heavily emphasizes the severity of the war: "furious close of civil butchery" (l.13). Yet like a dynamic leader, King Henry speaks with passion and conviction, revealing his goals and presenting his intentions to salvage his country's future. He creates a carnal image personifying England's civil war as a mother drinking the blood of her children, but then vows to rid his country of this thirst. He continues elaborating on his country's sorrows with a stream of very physical images and very powerful words: "those opposed eyes ... like the meteors of a troubled heaven ... Did meet in the intestine shock" (ll. 9,10,12). The deliberateness of his statements emphasizes England's widespread discontent, but more importantly, reveals his own resentments towards the warfare. When comparing war to an "ill-sheathed knife" (l.17), which will no longer "cut his master "(l.18), King Henry makes clear to the audience that ensuring peace within his country is his overriding ambition. Subsequent to his portrayal of civil war, the ruling King diverts the audiences attention towards his future objectives. In this second part of the monarch's speech, elements of propaganda again become very evident. King Henry's words become emotionally charged, refocusing his...

Find Another Essay On King Henry IV

Kingship in King Lear and King Henry IV, Part I

1736 words - 7 pages kingship: King Lear, a tragedy, and King Henry the IV, Part I, a history. In order to deconstruct the complexity of this task, one can say that both perspectives attempt to answer differently for two logically separate questions: who is the rightful ruler and what may a rightful ruler do (Shupack 70). The first perspective states that the rightful ruler is the one chosen by blood and by God, and that he may do anything within the limits of his

Napoleon Bonaparte vs. King Henry IV of France

2788 words - 12 pages Napoleon Bonaparte vs. King Henry IV of France The two notorious men in France, or should I say in history, have played a significant role in the history of France. Napoleon Bonaparte was labeled as a military commander and had significant roles in the government of France that his story is very interesting. King Henry IV of France was a monarch but there is a reason behind why he is a monarch. King Henry IV of France and Napoleon

Analysis of Three Scenes in Shakespeare's King Henry IV Part One

682 words - 3 pages for his upcoming meeting with his father the next morning. Falstaff uses his time in the role of King Henry to praise himself, but Hal interrupts, asserting that his father would not speak in that manner, so they exchange roles. Hal begins playing his father by countering everything that Falstaff has just said about himself. He labels him as a villainous, drunken, gluttonous, and unworthy criminal. He also goes on to characterize Falstaff as an

King Henry IV Part 1 Passage Analysis - Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115-138

1094 words - 4 pages Shakespeare's 'King Henry IV Part I' centres on a core theme of the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal's inner conflict, the country's political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of certain values exists on many levels, and so is

The Moralities of Falstaff and Prince Hal in King Henry IV

783 words - 3 pages Throughout King Henry IV Part 1, Shakespeare consistently contrasts the opposing worldviews of Falstaff and Prince Hal. Shakespeare portrays Falstaff as the old, overweight drunk who lives only to enjoy himself in the present. In contrast, Shakespeare shows Hal to be the sometimes irresponsible, nevertheless, intelligent and heroic prince whose entire life and character is about planning and preparing not only himself, but also others for the

What do you see as the main aspects of Kingship explored in Henry IV Part 2? Explain clearly how the play implies comparisons between King Henry IV and the future King, Hal

1729 words - 7 pages In King Henry IV Part 2, we see the growth and maturation of Prince Hal, from a playful troublemaker “engraffed to Falstaff”, into the great man who will bring order to England and rid the country of injustice and lawlessness. Kingship, along with its qualities and demands, is one of the central themes of the play; skilfully interwoven within the scenes, and developed as a thread that gains momentum during the course of the play

Shakespeare's Henry IV

1652 words - 7 pages leading shareholder and principal playwriter which helped him stay afloat during the rough times of the Black Plague. He had such an amazing group of actors that they were able to work in a theatre and they thrived during the tough times. In the Later 1950's, Shakespeare went on to write a series of historic plays. These included Richard II, Henry IV: Part on and Henry IV: Part Two. These plays are about a king who is not fit for the throne and is

Comedy in I Henry IV and II Henry IV by William Shakespeare

2714 words - 11 pages centre of the plays' comic action, the tavern is Falstaff's court; in it he is both King and court Jester. In pulling back from the rising dramatic action in this way, Shakespeare allows his audience to pause and "catch their breath" after the emotional turmoil created by the scenes involving the court and the rebels' camp. In II Henry IV, the play opens with Northumberland learning of the rebels' failure and his son Hotspur's death; the scene is

Tudor Family

912 words - 4 pages army its leader the king had died in the fight”. (Tudor history.org) Henry VII was one of those people who would not be expected to become king. But when Henry became king people thought it was a miracle; Henry’s father was Edmund Tudor. It was the ancestors of his mother that gave him the right of the throne. “By 1485 the war of the roses had been raging in England for many years between the houses of York and Lancaster”. (Tudor history.org

Henry IV: Appearance vs. Reality

1263 words - 5 pages 1: Henry IV: AAppearance vs. Reality'Shakespeare's play Henry IV begins with a king (King Henry) beginning a pilgrimage after killing King Richard II. Henry believes that by gaining the throne of England he has done an honourable deed, yet he admits that the fighting and bloodshed could continue, A. . . ill sheathed knife . . . @ (I.1.17). He, also, admits that his own son, Prince Hal, is not honourable enough to occupy the throne, Asee riot and

The French Wars of Religion : What were the causes and consequences of King Henry IV's death?

1496 words - 6 pages Aside from the French wars of religion, the assassination of King Henry IV was one of the major events which had left a significant impact onto the French. It was surprising for the mass when the king was murdered because he had already done so much for the country - not only because of his role as a king, but also for the people and the country which he was concerned. But was it really appalling? The Catholics and the Huguenots did not have a

Similar Essays

King Henry Iv Part 1 Essay

1171 words - 5 pages King Henry IV Part 1 Although most people find it hard to climb out of a whole they have dug themselves into, Prince Hal in Henry IV Part I is able to redeem himself even after the English King and nobility view him as a derelict with no future. He proves himself true to the Royal Throne when he defeats his young rival, Henry Percy. Through the exorcism of his immature ways, he earns himself the succession to the throne. In

King Henry Iv Part 1 Essay

1097 words - 4 pages Passage Analysis - Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115-138. Shakespeare’s ‘King Henry IV Part I’ centres on a core theme of the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal’s inner conflict, the country’s political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition

King Henry Iv By William Shakespeare

1201 words - 5 pages King Henry IV by William Shakespeare is a play based on history, a history of a kingdom in midst of war. To single out any one character as the hero would be biased. War is a conflict in which both sides are fighting for their beliefs and a hero of one side would be an enemy of the other. Who is right? Is a question we must ask ourselves but one that has multiple answers.It is important to understand just what constitutes a hero. Is a hero brave

Pope Gregory Ivv And King Henry Iv

720 words - 3 pages judge and dispose other wiser priest, appointed by the royal authority .St peter himself said “Fear god honor the king”, but Gregory had done opposite. He did not fear God and dishonored king whom God established .St pitter told to teach true doctrine, but he was teaching false. Thus the king Henry descend Pop Gregory in his letter. According to those arguments, Emperor Henry IV has the better argument and I would judge him winner of the controversy