This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

„Knowledge Is Nothing More Than The Systematic Organisation Of Facts.“ Discuss This Statement In Relation To Two Areas Of Knowledge.

1298 words - 5 pages

The given statement is that knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organisation of facts. I absolutely agree with the idea that the knowledge we humans use is based on a systematic organisation of facts. Therefore my answer to this question is “yes” and I am going to show that knowledge is merely based on facts and not intuition or emotions for example.

First I will give a short explanation about the word “knowledge” and the phrase “systematic organisation” and define what a “fact” is, then I will discuss my statement in relation to two areas of knowledge, which are in my example Science and Art. Counter-claims will be given in both areas to my stated thesis and that will lead me to my conclusion in the end.

“Knowledge” in the way it is meant in the statement above is the combination of information, skills, facts and acts one does and has because of experience, education and the ability to draw conclusions.
You should consider that the knowledge you gain is depending on the knowledge the authority, teaching you in terms of education, believes in. So for example 20 years ago a student of the Federal Republic of Germany learnt in history class totally different political issues and facts than students of politics classes of the German Democratical Republic (GDR) studied or gained.
A real life example is the topic “Cuba”. A teacher at a GDR-school would have told that Fidel Castro, the former leader of Cuba, is a brother in political ideas, that the socialistic thinking is better than the democratic one and that if we all pull on one string, we will change the world to a socialistically more suitable one.
A FRG- teacher would have told you that the people of Cuba are without the right to leave the country, to think what they want to, to vote or to have any alternatives.
So we have to reflect that knowledge in some way depends on the authority who is teaching you- and his or her attitude towards the world.

A “systematic organisation” means to me and in my argumentation that one is able to structure the mentioned information, skills, facts and acts to draw logical conclusions, to cope with unexpected situations and to generate ones own intelligence.
Facts are things that really occurred and that are incontestably and already analysed. Facts must be proven and backed up with evidence, scientists usually do that by experiments.
To get a better access to the theme I will focus on two special areas of knowledge, Natural science and art. To me both of these fields are different and so I may get a wider range of ideas and examples to discuss the given statement.
I am starting with the topic Science. The systematic organisation of facts sounds already as if it could be related to this discipline. Science is something that can be usually relied on, because scientists research information over a longer period of time to come to a clear conclusion.
An example for this is: When I was young I thought that leaves just fall down from trees randomly...

Find Another Essay On „Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organisation of facts.“ Discuss this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge.

Can we have beliefs or knowledge which are independent of our culture? Discuss in relation to at least two areas of knowledge

814 words - 4 pages science is important to culture because it helps us figure out why certain people have certain views and what affects those views. Ethics in relation to belief and culture is a little different. In the book “primitive culture” by Edward Burnett Tylor, he states that culture is "that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, law, morals, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society." I believe to a

“Knowledge is generated through the interaction of creative and critical thinking.” Determine the relevance of this statement in two areas of know

842 words - 4 pages interaction vary in areas of knowledge? Is thinking the only way to knowing? In science, in order to make discoveries, scientists used their imagination to discover facts, for example when Newton discovered gravity when an apple fell onto the ground. Instead of critically analyzing how it fell, he thought there was some sort of force that was pulling it down. He couldn’t see it but he believed there was a force. Thinking was not enough here; he

“Historians constantly reinterpret the past”. Discuss this statement in relation to the changing interpretation of Boudicca

1238 words - 5 pages "Historians constantly reinterpret the past". Discuss this statement in relation to the changing interpretation of Boudicca.Throughout the past, historians have been constantly reinterpreting Boudicca's story and relating her significance to events of the time. At several points in history, the image of Boudicca has been glorified and shaped to complement other significant people in society, such as Queen Victoria. Today, the understanding of

"Managers and leaders in contemporary organizations need a knowledge of reframing to effectively manage people". Discuss this statement

1536 words - 6 pages as investing, marketing, financing and operating environment has been changing for organizations.Organizations have to face the changing and deal with the changing to fit with the market trend. The challenge of finding the right way to frame our world or organizations is more difficult than ever before. In order to adapt with the changing world and business environment, organizations have to change and adjust their frames to survive in this

To what extent is faith a legitimate basis for knowledge claims, in religion and different areas of knowledge?

1574 words - 6 pages and there would be no way to construct any sort of knowledge system. My purpose in this essay is to establish the validity of this assertion and to demonstrate that not only is faith a legitimate basis for knowledge claims in religion, but also in all areas of knowledge.To start with, in order to effectively answer a question concerning "religious beliefs", we must first define the term. Obviously, there are many different religions, each with

The Role of Truth in Different Areas of Knowledge

1018 words - 4 pages different cultures and groups of individuals because emotion plays a great role in creating history. History is usually written by winners and is not always the same in different cultures. Historical evidences and facts that builds up history is divided into two sections; primary source and secondary source. Is is very difficult to say primary source is more reliable than secondary source since emotion must have been involved. An American war veteran

Discuss some ways in which statistics are used or misused in different Areas of Knowledge to assist and mislead us

1007 words - 4 pages outside than ever before', assistant professor of psychology, Karen Cogan says. In this case, the statistic is real but our original thinking is wrong, if we didn't realize our mistakes, our understanding would be distort directly by our prior belief.Different areas of knowledge are not only used to help us determine the statistical evidence, but also it could be mislead us. During the Sars period, while Sars occured, we did not really care too

"Necessity is the mother of invention". Evaluate this statement in relation to scientific and technological experimentation

4670 words - 19 pages Introduction Rationale This research topic "necessity is the mother of invention. Evaluate this statement in relation to scientific and technological experiment." was chosen for studying in the area of informatics study. However, the research topic was seemed to be in the philosophical term to understand the basic need of technology more than the informatics subject, which deals with creating and developing of computer study. So that this topic

"Civilisation is a veneer; we are all savages at heart" Discuss this statement in relation to The Lord of the Flies

763 words - 3 pages A veneer is something that hides something unpleasant or unwanted. In this case it is the savagery that is being hidden by civilisation.In The Lord of the Flies this is best seen through the two main characters of Ralph and Jack. Ralph is the elected and respected leader of the boys whereas Jack is his rival who believes that he should be the chief. In my opinion the two boys represent the two competing philosophies of life on the island. Jack

"Patients have the right to say no." Discuss this statement in relation to the adoption of the role of learned helplessness in some individuals experiencing illness

2219 words - 9 pages of living, and those who have an external locus of control, who are more likely to suffer from learned helplessness in a hospital situation, as they feel that the hospital staff know more about their illness than they do, and will know how to deal with it effectively. This learned helplessness is further reinforced by the power of the medical staff, as noted above, who, ostensibly believing they are acting in the patient's best interests, will

To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge?

1471 words - 6 pages theory is correct/ reasonable. In more complex topics such as religion, which relies mainly on faith, emotion and beliefs, evidence plays a very different and often minimal role. This is also often the case with ethics where our morals, and our views of other people are based upon intuition and Perception rather than evidence. In the area of knowledge of mathematics, language allows us to generalize words, equations and ideas to make knowledge in

Similar Essays

“Knowledge Is Nothing More Than The Systematic Organization Of Facts”. Discuss This Statement In Relation To Two Areas Of Knowledge.

901 words - 4 pages “Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts”. Discuss this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge. Knowledge is considered as familiarity with some issue, which includes facts. According to the classical definition of knowledge, there are three criteria that a statement must satisfy in order to be considered as knowledge: it must be true, justified and believed. What is considered as fact? The word itself

“Knowledge Is Nothing More Than The Systematic Organization Of Facts” Discuss This Statement In Relation To Two Areas Of Knowledge

1593 words - 7 pages nothing more than a product of this systematic processing is largely supported by the certainty achieved along the way which allows the facts to be beyond reasonable doubt. I have come to conclude as a knower, an in-depth examination in the areas of knowledge is a result of the systematic organization of undeniable facts. Simply put, the process of using the things we know for sure to gain further knowledge is essential in expanding our overall understanding.

Knowledge Is Nothing More Than The Systematic Organization Of Facts

1387 words - 6 pages The Authenticity of Factual Knowledge Intro The prescribed title ‘‘Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organization of facts.’’ is implying that knowledge is the process by which we acquire knowledge on a given topic, here, on the areas of knowledges mathematics and history. To know the facts we organize them in an orderly fashion. This claim raises the knowledge issue: To what extent is the organization of facts in mathematics and

“Knowledge Takes The Form Of A Combination Of Stories And Facts.” How Accurate Is This Claim In Two Areas Of Knowledge?

1217 words - 5 pages natural science. There is one real life situation which could demonstrate these knowledge issues: history provides the stories but is based on the facts. As one of the most well-known massacres during the Second World War, Nanking Massacre have caused more than 200,000 Chinese civilians’ death in a week due to the Japanese armies’ killing (Wikipedia.com 2014). Multiple evidences have shown how the invaders attacked Nanking and massacred civilians