Labeling Theory Essay

3497 words - 14 pages

Deviance, like beauty, is in the eyes of the beholder. There is nothing inherently deviant in any human act, something is deviant only because some people have been successful in labelling it so. J. L Simmons The definition of the situation implies that if you define a situation as real, it is real only in its consequences.INTRODUCTIONLabelling theory, stemming from the influences of Cooley, Mead, Tannenbaum, and Lemert, has its origins somewhere within the context of the twentieth century. However, Edwin Lemert is widely considered the producer and founder of the original version of labelling theory. This paper, not a summary, provides a brief history of labelling theory, as well as, its ...view middle of the document...

They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders. Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling. INFLUENCESLabelling theory was significantly influenced by the Chicago School and Symbolic Interactionism. The sociology department in the University of Chicago is where early labelling theorists received their graduate training. These theorists were trained in terms of symbolic interaction and specific methods of participatory field research. The symbolic interaction theory exposed early theorists to the study of social interaction, as well as, the interpretation of society from the actor's point of view. Everett Hughes and Alvin Gouldner were two of the earliest theorists to train at the Chicago School. However, the foundations of this view of deviance were said to have been first established by Edwin Lemert (1951) and were subsequently developed by Howard S. Becker (1963). As a matter of fact, labelling theory has subsequently become a dominant paradigm in the explanation of deviance. Furthermore, the symbolic interaction perspective was extremely active in the early foundations of labelling theory. Labelling theory is constituted essentially by two propositions. The first is that deviant behaviour is to be seen not simply as the violation of a norm, but as any behaviour which is successfully defined or labelled as deviant. The deviance does not inhere in the act itself but in the response of others to that act. In other words, the deviance is said to be in the eye of the beholder. The second proposition claims that labelling produces or amplifies deviance. The deviant's response to societal reaction leads to secondary deviation by which the deviant comes to accept a self-image or self-definition as someone who is permanently locked within a deviant role. Furthermore, the distinctiveness of the approach is that it draws attention to deviance as the outcome of social imputations and the exercise of social control. Labelling theory is very complex, making it quite different than other theories. Instead of looking at why some social groups commit more crime, labelling theory asks why some people committing some action come to be defined as deviant, while others do not. Labelling theory is also interested in the effect of labelling individuals. As well, labelling theorists note that most people commit crimes at some time in their lives but not everyone becomes...

Find Another Essay On Labeling Theory

A Comparison of Conflict and Labeling Theory in the Context of Youth Gangs

1911 words - 8 pages Sotelo 2004; Sims 1997; Wiley et al. 2013; Yoder et al. 2003). This paper will examine the factors associated with youth gang membership using Karl Marx's conflict theory and labeling theory in comparison. Although conflict theory helps explain why a troublesome economy and coming from a low-socioeconomic status contributes to gang involvement, the theory has its limitations. On the other hand, labeling theory is unable to fully explain youth

Labeling Theory and its Media INfluences

1120 words - 5 pages Labelling theory is how an individual’s behaviour and self-identity maybe determined or influenced by the labels used to classify them. The concepts of the self-fulfilling prophecy and stereotyping can be associated with this theory. This theory focuses on the tendency to label negatively, minority groups or those that are perceived as deviant from cultural norms. Developed in the 1950s and 1960s by sociologists, with Howard Beckers book in

Labeling Theory and Its Effectiveness on Youth Crime and Anti-Social Behavior

989 words - 4 pages Summarise labelling theory and then consider its effectiveness in considering youth crime and anti-social behaviour in contemporary British society Labelling theory is the theory of how applying a label to an individual influences their lifestyle, and how the social reaction to this label influences the individual. "...social groups create deviance by making rules whose infraction creates deviance, and by applying those roles to particular

Do We Need to Label Foods Containing Genetically Modified Organisms?

659 words - 3 pages participants’ cognitive world” (Sénémeaud, C., & Somat, A.,2009). Conclusion The example with the Prop 37 and the GMO labeling reflects on the theory of cognitive dissonance and persuasion. Even strong beliefs can be changed if they are being persuaded in the right way and in the right moment. The persuader will provide all the necessary tools and arguments to prove their point of view. The votes on Proposition 37 were highly persuaded through the

labelling theory

2780 words - 11 pages these imaginary observations (Cooley 1902). The main idea of the looking glass self is that people define themselves according to society's perception of them (www.d.umn.edu ). Cooley's ideas, coupled with the works of Mead, are very important to labeling theory and its approach to a person's acceptance of labels as attached by society. George Mead's theory is less concerned with the micro-level focus on the deviant and more concerned with the macro

Labeling Youths...and The Consequences Thereof

1452 words - 6 pages not they become an outsider. Labeling youths is an unnecessary evil that often times changes children into criminals. To understand labeling we must first look at its definition. Labeling Theory is a theoretical approach to deviant behavior, basically stating that applying formal definitions to an individual results in a negative self-concept that may subsequently provide motivation for further acts of deviance. (Rush 203) Labeling became a

Deviance, Crime, and Punishment - Sociology - Essay

437 words - 2 pages class which could have far more consequences. Feminist perspective highlights the importance of gender equality for crimes against woman and male socialization for the gender difference. Interactionist explains the importance of social interaction in deviance and reactions to deviance, labeling theory assumes the labeling progression ensures that people will continue to commit deviance, based on their appearance, race, social class, and other

Genetically Modified Foods

1742 words - 7 pages I can think of Evan resolving this challenge is to temporarily remove the label of “deontologist” off the table, and answer from the point of view of a person with no preference to any moral theory. Back on topic, this is due in part, to the fact that the general public does not have a legitimate source of information for purchasing foods with GMOs. Some of the governments of the countries with the mandatory labeling laws have run their own

Social Process and Social Learning

841 words - 4 pages Social Process theories are the process of interaction between individuals and society for their explanatory power. In other words a theory in which individuals feel as if society is not helping them leave helpful lives. Some of the theories within Social Process are Social Learning theory, Social Control theory, and Labeling theory. Social Learning theory focuses on what an individual learns from observing others in society. Social Control

Sociological Perspective on Teenage Drug Abuse

965 words - 4 pages . This is simply a theory of how people understand other people. Interaction theory has 3 different sub categories: differential association, labeling theory, and control theory. Differential association is people learn about criminal behavior through association with others who engage in crime. Differential association was proposed by Edwin H. Sutherland. Labeling theory is people become deviant because certain labels are attached to them by

Sociology: Value Conflict

1340 words - 5 pages path of a deviant Behavior and it becomes hard to shake off the deviant label as others see it as a master status of the individual. He points out that when studying deviant people one should not take their deviance for granted, as one cannot assume that these people have actually committed a deviant act or broken some rule, because the process of labeling theory may not be infallible. In other words, to be deviant behavior deviant does not

Similar Essays

Labeling Theory Essay

4032 words - 16 pages given to people of various cultures, races, religions, social status, appearance, intelligence, attitudes, behaviors, and many other ways. This paper will discuss how labeling can affect people, whether it be a positive or negative influence, and in various aspects of their lives, including: criminological, educational, sociological, and psychological. Social Context When looking at any theory it is important to take into consideration the

Labeling Theory Of Deviance Essay

2539 words - 11 pages The Labeling Theory-also referred to as Social Reaction Theory- asserts that crime is a label attached to wrongdoing, and often the label becomes a stigma that increases criminality. The Labeling Theory became most dominant between the early 1960s and the late 1970s. The labeling theory says that deviant individuals are deviant mainly because they are seen deviant by society; individuals who are labeled as deviant may be likely to reject

Sexual Offender Laws And The Labeling Theory

1812 words - 7 pages Many people might think that sex offenders are repugnant to society and that people who commit sex crimes should be removed from our society. The reality is that many people do not know that most people who commit sex offenses are normal people. In most cases, they are hardworking people who got caught doing something our society ‘thinks’ is wrong and get labelled sex offenders. This is where Labeling Theory comes into places, because it focus

The Labeling Theory And Its Effect On Devience

692 words - 3 pages According to labeling theory, deviance is a product of a societal reaction to behaviour. A label is created as a reaction to an isolated incident by agents of social control. The recipient then internalizes the label and absorbs it into their self identity. Once they identify with the label, the individual will act in ways that fulfill the label. The focus of labeling theory is on the process of how the label leads to further delinquent