Laissez Faire Approach And Poverty. Essay

1783 words - 7 pages

For better than two decades, the orthodox recipe for global growth has been embodied in the so-called Washington Consensus. This approach, advocated by the United States and enforced by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), holds that growth is maximized when barriers to the free flow of capital and commerce are dismantled and when individual economies are exposed to the discipline, consumer markets, and entrepreneurs of the world economic system. Proponents of this view have contended that the free-market approach to development will also alleviate poverty, both by raising overall growth rates and by bringing modern capitalism to the world's poorest.Yet the actual experience since 1980 contradicts almost every one of these claims. Indeed, the free-trade/free-capital formula has led to slower growth and more vulnerability for poor countries--and to greater income disparity among individuals. In 1980 median income in the richest 10 percent of countries was 77 times greater than in the poorest 10 percent; by 1999 that gap had grown to 122 times. Progress in poverty reduction has been limited and geographically isolated. The number of poor people rose from 1987 to 1998; in many countries, the share of poor people increased (in 1998 close to half the population in many parts of the world were considered poor). In 1980 the world's poorest 10 percent, or 400 million people, lived on the equivalent of 72 cents a day or less. The same number of people had 79 cents per day in 1990 and 78 cents in 1999. The income of the world's poorest did not even keep up with inflation.Why has the laissez-faire approach worsened both world growth and world income distribution? First, the IMF and the World Bank often commend austerity as an economic cure-all in order to reassure foreign investors of a sound fiscal and business climate--but austerity, not surprisingly, leads to slow growth. Second, slow growth itself can mean widening income inequality, since high growth and tight labor markets are what increase the bargaining power of the poor. (Economists estimate that poverty increases by 2 percent for every 1 percent of decline in growth.) Third, the hands-off approach to global development encourages foreign capital to seek regions and countries that offer the cheapest production costs--so even low-income countries must worry that some other, even more desperate workforce will do the same work for a lower wage. Finally, small and newly opened economies in the global free market are vulnerable to investment fads and speculative pressures from foreign investors--factors that result in instability and often overwhelm the putative benefits of greater openness. All of these upheavals disproportionately harm the poorest.Capital and TradeBecause capital controls were reduced or eliminated virtually everywhere over the past 20 years, the flow of capital to developing countries increased rapidly, from $1.9 billion in 1980 to $120.3 billion in 1997 (the...

Find Another Essay On Laissez-faire Approach and Poverty.

Discuss two sociological theories of poverty and why it is important for social workers to develop a sociological approach to practice

2128 words - 9 pages poverty. The Individualistic theory; which blames the responsibility of being poor with the individuals themselves, and the Marxist theory which views poverty as a social problem that has been produced and reproduced by structural forces in society. This assignment shall explain why it is important for social workers to develop a sociologic approach to practice and consider how these two theoretical perspectives contribute to social workers

Laissez- Faire Capitalism vs. Modified Market Capitalism Which has Biblical support?

632 words - 3 pages Over the years capitalism has been influenced by religious and evolutionary thought just as it has taken on different forms and variations. Some forms of capitalism bear absolutely no resemblance to each other while others are quite similar. Two forms that are quite opposite in their approach to capitalism and philosophy are Laissez- Faire capitalism and Modified Market capitalism. Before beginning a discussion of these forms of capitalism

Laissez Faire

1812 words - 7 pages I don't view laissez-faire as the best economic system. In fact, under it the economy would suffer and only the big businesses would thrive. Laissez-faire is an economic theory which states that there is an Invisible Hand guiding the economy, thus there is no need for government involvement. The Invisible Hand refers to uncontrolled competition, with greed as the major factor, in fact it is considered by some to be the purest form of competition

Victorian Attitudes to Poverty - Essay

942 words - 4 pages poverty was that it was the individual’s responsibility to keep out of poverty. If he failed to do this it was assumed that the poverty was the fault of a character defect in the individual rather than as a result of economic forces beyond his control. This was due to the fact that both the Conservative and Liberal governments of the day believed in the policy of Laissez-Faire. Laissez-Faire is the policy of non state intervention. This means

The Enlightenment and a Desire for a Free Market

1769 words - 7 pages , led to the first major economic establishment in the Enlightenment period, laissez faire, which banned the government from interfering with private trade. Adam Smith, its huge supporter, managed to get this concept to disseminate safely with various rules and restrictions attached; otherwise, this method might allow too much freedom. The economy during the Renaissance period, transforming especially with Adam Smith’s innovative theories during

take home essay

1756 words - 8 pages Q2: There are multiple conditions that occurred in the US that aided in the economic downturn leading to the Great Depression. Prior to the stock market crash of 1929, a classical approach, advocated by Adam Smith, was how America felt its political and economic system functioned. Adam Smith’s classical approach is embedded in the concept of a laissez-faire economic market, which suggests that the US would thrive if left alone (lecture). This

Supervision and Management

1224 words - 5 pages employees where it is due. As his is captain, what kind of advice would you give to Gresham? As captain, I would simply approach Sgt. Gresham in a custom professional manner, and advise him to settle into his new position slowly; focus on getting naturally acclimated to this new position, before he decides to get use to any supervising style – especially one such as, Laissez-Faire. His ability to be able to relate to others during his patrol days


2077 words - 8 pages function-oriented. They leave social services in the hands of private sector. Nearly all the social, educational and health services have been cut so the proportion of people living in poverty has increased, the income gap between the rich and the poor widened. The number of homeless and hungry continued to grow.Conclusion As it was seen, I saw two break points in the history of poverty; one is the rise of capitalism (laissez-faire), another is

Laissez-faire vs. Government Intervention

1221 words - 5 pages market power.Laissez-faire is a French expression based upon the theories of Adam Smith, an 18 century Scot political economist, whose writings greatly influenced the growth of capitalism in several parts of the world (Biography). Smith believed that as long as markets were free and competitive, the actions of private individuals, would lead to better social results. The idea behind the concept of Laissez-faire is that economies function more

Weber's Three Types of Leadership

1810 words - 8 pages Throughout history there have always been leaders. Leadership is important in society, although not all leaders are the same. M. Weber described three different types of leaderships, the Authoritarian, Democratic, and Laissez-faire leadership. All of these leaderships tend to have their own advantages and disadvantages. The Authoritarian leadership is a leadership based on an individual’s ideas that controls a group. The leader usually have

To What Extent Did the Government Adhere to the Principles of Laissez Faire from 1865 to 1900

1969 words - 8 pages Laissez faire, meaning "let them do," is a governmental policy i which there is little government intervention. A french philosopher and the finance minister under King Louis XIV's reign, Jean Baptiste Colbert is said to be the first person to disseminate the principles of laissez faire. From 1865 to 1900, the federal government of the United States moderately adopted the laissez faire system. At first, the government did practice laissez

Similar Essays

Dbq: The Federal Government And Laissez Faire, 1865 1900

559 words - 2 pages remain if utilized responsibly.The successful individual enterprises were determined to maintain the Laissez-Faire policy. In Document A, Amasa Walker is quoted saying, "Economically, it will ever remain true, that the government is best which governs least." When the government is too involved in the economy, a great many regulations are set and the corporations become less prosperous because their effective methods are limited. A New York City

Communist Challenge To Classical Liberalism And Laissez Faire

1549 words - 7 pages nature was evidently destined” (Owen, p. 98). The evil that Owen is referring to is the amount of control that the government has on the people. (p. 100). This relates to communist ideals because the concept of communism focuses on the government not being involved in the affairs of the people. This is also a concept behind laissez-faire economy. Owen refers to “men of industry” and encourages them to revolt against the rich elite controlling the

Violations Of Laissez Faire By The U.S Federal Government Between 1865 And 1900

728 words - 3 pages The principle of laissez faire is that the an unobtrusive government is the best government; that the government necessarily only 'maintain domestic tranquillity, defend the people from invasion, and protect them when travelling.' To leave economic workings of the country to the people and let the 'motives for production' be that of the people not the government. Our government took such a stance in its early decades, but as national debt rose

Global Poverty And Philosophy: Why The Capabilities Approach Applies

2362 words - 10 pages Global Poverty and Philosophy: Why the Capabilities Approach Applies Although our world is becoming increasingly more technologically advanced and developed, one billion people are still expected to live in extreme poverty by 2015 (Country Comparisons). As long as humanity has existed, there have been impoverished people left behind in the wake of advancement. Many philosophical theories have been published attempting to solve global poverty