Laissez Faire Vs. Government Intervention Essay

1221 words - 5 pages

Less government intervention in economic affairs means more economic freedom and prosperity. In other words, when people are free to choose and pursue profitable opportunities, the economy of a country runs more efficiently, creating greater wealth and improving the standard of living. While this is a true statement for some people, others argue that government involvement is necessary in order to respond to market failures and limit abuses of market power.Laissez-faire is a French expression based upon the theories of Adam Smith, an 18 century Scot political economist, whose writings greatly influenced the growth of capitalism in several parts of the world (Biography). Smith believed that as long as markets were free and competitive, the actions of private individuals, would lead to better social results. The idea behind the concept of Laissez-faire is that economies function more efficiently when people can pursue their economic activities and interests freely. Laissez-faire opposes governmental regulation and intervention in commerce and states that the government should not interfere with decisions made by individuals. The theory also embodies free trade. It indicates that protectionist measures should not be used.Protectionism is a view that free trade is injurious and should be restricted. Protectionist policies are used in order to protect domestic industries. Protectionism is often criticized by the supporters of free trade as harming economies instead of assisting them (Frank and Bernanke). Tariff is an example of a protectionist measure which the supporters of Laissez-faire view as an obstacle to free trade among nations limiting their opportunities to benefit from exchanging goods and services with one another.People who support a laissez faire system are against minimum wages and any other forms of trade restrictions. They also consider limited government interference in private economic decisions such as pricing and production of goods and/or services as very beneficial, because it strengthens and makes the economies more efficient (Frank and Bernanke). One strong argument against government intervention that the supporters of Laissez-faire often use is the fact that economic freedom has been shown to associate strongly with higher incomes, higher quality of life, and so on. This means that when government limits its participation, the economies run more efficiently making it possible for the countries to improve the standard of living.The supporters of Laissez-faire claim that government does not have any right to accuse thriving companies of having monopoly power. For example, Microsoft Corporation, which is a computer technology corporation with global annual revenue of $44,282 as of July, was accused by the United States of enjoying monopoly power (Income Statement). Many people claim the government is wrongly punishing Microsoft for being productive and successful, arguing that Windows dominates the market because of the...

Find Another Essay On Laissez-faire vs. Government Intervention

Laissez- Faire Capitalism vs. Modified Market Capitalism Which has Biblical support?

632 words - 3 pages Over the years capitalism has been influenced by religious and evolutionary thought just as it has taken on different forms and variations. Some forms of capitalism bear absolutely no resemblance to each other while others are quite similar. Two forms that are quite opposite in their approach to capitalism and philosophy are Laissez- Faire capitalism and Modified Market capitalism. Before beginning a discussion of these forms of capitalism

The Enlightenment and a Desire for a Free Market

1769 words - 7 pages , led to the first major economic establishment in the Enlightenment period, laissez faire, which banned the government from interfering with private trade. Adam Smith, its huge supporter, managed to get this concept to disseminate safely with various rules and restrictions attached; otherwise, this method might allow too much freedom. The economy during the Renaissance period, transforming especially with Adam Smith’s innovative theories during

How far and in which ways do Government/Industry relations evolve as economies develop and mature during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries?

2050 words - 8 pages government interaction with industry was the dominance of the 'laissez-faire' phenomenon. E.J.Hobsbawn describes this period simply; ' The history of government economic policy and theory since the Industrial Revolution is essentially that of the rise and fall of the laissez-faire'. Hobsbawn concedes that total government laissez-faire is impossible. It can be argued that no government can be completely indifferent to the economic stability and

Reflection Paper on the economic roles in the United States

817 words - 3 pages driving force of the economy under the Economic Liberalism system.Also, under this type of system, competition regulates the economy. Businesses compete with one another through the making of new and better products and the selling of already existing products at lower prices than others. Another policy reigns under economic liberalism; that policy is Laissez-faire. Laissez-fair is a policy where there is no government involvement in the economic

Roosevelt Vs. Hoover and the Great Depression

1653 words - 7 pages alternatives. The time when people starting to seek alternatives was at the onset of the depression when America's political views drastically change. As the Great Depression, started in 1929, America began to view conservatives as following the policies of social Darwinism, laissez-faire, and having small governments. In contrast, liberals were seen as following polices of having more government regulation and large governments. Thus because the

President Franklin D. Roosevelt is commonly thought of as a liberal and President Herbert C. Hoover as a conservative. To what extent are these characterizations valid?

877 words - 4 pages Great Depression occurred during the term of Hoover, the public saw him starting his presidency as a liberal and ending it as a conservative. With the end of the Progressive Age in 1910, big businesses were a major success because men like Hoover had kept government from superseding the economy . These laissez-faire policies seemed particularly tolerant to the public, compared to the public-purpose policies sustained by Teddy Roosevelt. The

What is Social Darwinism?

1494 words - 6 pages method or for political doctrine. A 'social Darwinist' could just as well be a defender of laissez-faire as a defender of state socialism, just as much an imperialist as a domestic eugenist (McLean, 490). Social Darwinism was often found in laissez-faire ideologies, which advocated an individualistic order of society, during the XXth century and they were almost always against any type of government intervention. On the other hand, Reform

Laissez Faire

1812 words - 7 pages I don't view laissez-faire as the best economic system. In fact, under it the economy would suffer and only the big businesses would thrive. Laissez-faire is an economic theory which states that there is an Invisible Hand guiding the economy, thus there is no need for government involvement. The Invisible Hand refers to uncontrolled competition, with greed as the major factor, in fact it is considered by some to be the purest form of competition

Final

1262 words - 6 pages other words, the Great Society ended up failing because it was designed to have people dependent on the government forever without people helping themselves. In Conclusion, the key word for government involvement is balance. Our history has seen both ends of the spectrum. During the Gilded age, the government followed the practice of a laissez-faire economics, which meant businesses were free from government intervention. This system posed a

Capitalism: A Superior Economic System

1725 words - 7 pages economic system. This concept is based on laissez-faire, a French phrase that means “let do.” Laissez-faire is a policy where private party transactions have no interference from the government. Although, when this principle is applied to capitalism, there are still taxes, regulations, and tariffs, but they are typically kept to a minimum. In reality, a truly laissez-faire economic system has never existed (“Laissez-faire”). So, with the government

A Comparison of Three Book Resources on Capitalism

1017 words - 5 pages of the boat if she has a better idea. The boat nearing the waterfall can be used as an example of what can happen with laissez-faire economy, where there is no government intervention in the economy. During times of recession in a classical liberalism economy, there is nothing to go back on when you go over the edge. Like the boat when you go over the cliff you hit rock bottom. Like the people standing at the front of the boat doing nothing, in a

Similar Essays

Dbq: The Federal Government And Laissez Faire, 1865 1900

559 words - 2 pages The period of American history from 1865 to 1900 consisted of much controversy concerning economic control. Individual enterprises fought diligently to dominate economic affairs but the government was obligated to intervene when unjust activity was apparent. It was unanimously believed, among businessmen, that the government should have very little say in economic issues, the basis for Laissez-Faire. This policy invited the rights of the public

Violations Of Laissez Faire By The U.S Federal Government Between 1865 And 1900

728 words - 3 pages The principle of laissez faire is that the an unobtrusive government is the best government; that the government necessarily only 'maintain domestic tranquillity, defend the people from invasion, and protect them when travelling.' To leave economic workings of the country to the people and let the 'motives for production' be that of the people not the government. Our government took such a stance in its early decades, but as national debt rose

Exploring Reasons The British Government Abandon The Policy Of Laissez Faire?

2903 words - 12 pages The desertion by the British government of the laissez-faire approach was instigated by a magnitude of rationales that induced this transformation of attitude. Laissez-faire translates from French to denote ‘let do’ or in English terminology to ‘leave alone’. In practice, this perspective meant that the government did not interfere positively or negatively in people’s lives. The belief was that if a person was impoverished they were

To What Extent Did The Government Adhere To The Principles Of Laissez Faire From 1865 To 1900

1969 words - 8 pages Laissez faire, meaning "let them do," is a governmental policy i which there is little government intervention. A french philosopher and the finance minister under King Louis XIV's reign, Jean Baptiste Colbert is said to be the first person to disseminate the principles of laissez faire. From 1865 to 1900, the federal government of the United States moderately adopted the laissez faire system. At first, the government did practice laissez