This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Land Ownership Differences Essay

792 words - 4 pages

How could land be someone's property? The Native Americans believed that there was no such thing as land property. On the other hand, the Europeans claimed land ownership all over the world. The attitudes towards ownership of land differ tremendously. The Europeans believed that a one person had the right to own land, while the Indians had communal property.

The Indians believed that the land was for harvesting and hunting, therefore they didn't have to own the land to be able to use it and share it with the other members of their tribes. Although the Europeans believed the Indians to be savages, the Indians were very civilized people. According to Give Me Liberty by Eric Foner, the Indians ...view middle of the document...

The Dutch West India Company was established specifically for the trade of beaver fur. It monopolized the beaver fur market. The land that the

Indians have been using for harvesting and hunting for years became a major trading post for the Europeans.

Although the Europeans were building their trading empire, the Indians did not take seizing of their land lightly. There many rebellions against the settling Europeans. One famous rebellion would be Pontiac's Rebellion. Pontiac tried to attack a British fort in Detroit. Their effort was unfruitful; they lost the battle against the British. However; after the lost they commenced a siege against the British that lasted for months. While Pontiac and his confederacy fought the British in the lower colonies. There were other tribes plotting and fighting against the British.2 One of the tribes was the Shawnee tribe, who leader was Tecumseh.

Tecumseh grew up while the Indians and the Americans were at war already. During his childhood Tecumseh witness how the Americans intruded on the Indian lands even after he British gave them Ohio. His constant exposure to war gave him a tactical edge. He used what he learned and recruited other tribes to fight against the Americans.3 The battles against the Americans was known as the Tecumseh Rebellion.

Tecumseh Rebellion...

Find Another Essay On Land ownership Differences

Comparison/Contrast Between American Indians and English Settlers of Jamestown

606 words - 2 pages , believing in only one god. The Natives, on the other hand, believed that there were many gods. There were not only differences in their religious beliefs, though. For instance, the Powhatan Indians honored their women and treated them with a high respect. They believed that women were the "giver of life" in society, therefore they were greatly valued. The Colonists, on the other hand, believed that women were property. Land ownership was a conflict as

Robert Nozick's Libertarian Views of Justice in "Anarchy, Stat, And Utopia"

1030 words - 5 pages constitute injustice. Nosick favors a state in which the dominant protection agency as the only form of "government" serves to protect those who chose to freely participate in the service. The individual is free to go about his life so long as he does not violate an individual or worsen the conditions of the land for others. Having the right to ownership does not mean the right to harm, but rather the right to exclude. Just as I would not steal property

Property Rights

1808 words - 8 pages associated with certain objects , things , since no object can not be property, the economic content of the property can not be reduced to its real , property content. Item becomes the property only when people come together in a certain relationship to its subject. The main feature of the property is not something that is assigned to , and who and as assigned . Differences in different forms of ownership are not so much objects of property, as in the

America Colonization Differences

875 words - 4 pages interracial marriages. This created a need for the colonists to homestead there, but they never seemed to establish any form of self government.Holland never had a large land footprint on the New World as some of the other European nations did, but what they started in New Netherlands and New Amsterdam (New York City) helped shape America into the melting pot of the world. The Dutch are greatly responsible for vast culture differences in New

Land Claims

978 words - 4 pages There has been a great deal of contention over Aboriginal Rights in Canada. Much of this conflict can be said to stem from the differences in both the philosophy and cultural systems of Aboriginal and non-aboriginal people, with much of it originating from the time of the original European settlement of Canada (UBC Law, 2009). The focus of this conflict has been primarily on the rights to land, sea and resources, as well as how the law is to

Jean-Jaques Rousseau's "Social Contract"

1091 words - 4 pages . Wealth would be spread fairly even to destroy the artificial differences. There are some similarities between communism and Rousseau's perfect government, like ownership and sharing of wealth evenly.Rousseau once said, "His fellows shall force him to be free." To explain that, Rousseau supported the idea of general will. Now many believe this leaves out minorities. Under Rousseau's beliefs, this is not true. Anyone who doesn't believe the same

Natives and Self-government

4501 words - 18 pages Northern Alberta managed to threaten the negotiation of governance restructuring. On November 14, 1989, the Paddle Prairie Settlement Council, whose land was among the most oil rich of all the Settlements, indicated it would leave the negotiation. This was because the Council felt, among other things, that land ownership should remain with individual Settlements and not, as was indicated in the agreement, with a General Council which would

The Power of Land: Barn Burn by William Faulkner

1855 words - 7 pages The importance of land ownership has been a vital part of modern society due to the many goods and resources one can acquire from it. Because of this, landowners have a distinct advantage over non-land owners when it comes to these resources. Not only are landowners able to use the land themselves, but grant others the ability to use their land for a percentage of the produce. This is known as sharecropping. As seen is William Faulkner’s

Comparative Analysis of Economic and Political Cleavages in South Africa and Zimbabwe

2346 words - 9 pages similar in some respects. It is necessary to briefly review the history of each country in respect to this cleavage to better understand current discontinuities and to note the clear differences in contemporary land reform that are being implemented in the two countries. Both South Africa and Zimbabwe were British colonies. All the land in these colonies was owned by white Europeans and farmed by poor black Africans. In 1980, Rhodesia broke from

Politics and the Reduction of Native American Land

690 words - 3 pages Representatives, and bureaucracies that carryout federal action. Natives on the other hand have never really had large established governments. They have only had tribes that are run by tribal leaders. That is only very local and incredibly small compared to the white man’s structures. The misunderstandings come when the whites have attempted to communicate with the natives on things such as land ownership. In the white man’s mind if someone

Canadian and American History of Relations with Aboriginal Peoples -compare treatment of First Nations by AMerican and Canadians -consider whether either could be considered humane

919 words - 4 pages prospect of starvation because of a rapidly decreasing buffalo population. While the American Natives chose to fight back, the Canadian Indians accepted the offer of treaties. In return for giving up their claim to ownership of land, Natives were given a small piece of their land back as reserves and some government assistance. In 1877 the last of the treaties were negotiated with the Blackfoot Confederacy (Bowers and Garrod 189). They were also

Similar Essays

Native American Vs. European Way Of Life

582 words - 2 pages , exhibited an extensive variation in their ideals. Europeans and Native Americans maintained contradictory social, economic, and spiritual practices. The European social structure was heavily influenced by land ownership, with a land-wealthy elite at its center. Europeans viewed land as a resource to be exploited for human benefit. Property was the basis of independence, material wealth, and political status. Native Americans deemed the exact

Conflicting Conceptions Of Ownership Essay

1249 words - 5 pages granted individual ownership over the portion of land granted to him. The amount and quality of the land granted to each colonist depended on his ability to improve it.Overall, the differences in the use of land and beliefs in the concept of property have led to cultural stereotypes and conflicts. The biggest misconception of the English was that the Native Americans had no private property. Since they did not have a permanent settlement and

English Colonists Vs Native Americans: Property Rights In The New World

1206 words - 5 pages with them for land. This led to conflict for since the Indians believed that they were selling one thing and the English thought that they were buying another. Once the laws were passed that said no English men could buy property from an Indian, only from the Crown, the Native Americans soon lost any ownership over their natural right to the land: “Even by the seventeenth century, Indian lands were regarded as being entirely within English

Europeans Vs. Native Americans Essay

1018 words - 4 pages toward the Native Americans, and also the "clash of cultures" which occurred when Europeans reached America, were the ones I consider most relevant and influential to the inability of stopping "the war".One of the fundamental differences between the two peoples' philosophies lay in the question of land ownership. "The Europeans, taking their preconceived views with them to America, believed in the concept of land ownership. They believed that a