Law Of Evidence Essay

2100 words - 8 pages

After over 100 years the provisions of the Criminal Evidence Act 1898 relating to the cross examination of the accused are set to be fundamentally reconsidered. Three key reports have recommended such action. Lord Justice Auld in the Criminal Court Review, the Government in "The Way Ahead" policy paper and the Law Commission in their report Evidence of Bad Character in Criminal Proceedings have all outlined solutions to solve the problems that allow the current rules for cross examination of defendants under the Criminal Evidence Act 1898 to operate unfairly and distort the process. Although most agree that reform is necessary how this should be done has proved a more difficult question to answer.Broadly speaking the Criminal Evidence Act 1898, sections 1(2) and 1(3) state that an accused cannot be cross-examined on his or her previous misconduct. The main reasons advanced for the rule are that such evidence is generally irrelevant and that, in any event, its prejudicial effect is likely to outweigh its probative effect. However, there are three exceptions to the general rule: first, where it would be admissible to prove he is guilty of the offence charged, in the main similar fact evidence, but also including evidence under various statutes; second, where he has sought to establish that he is of good character or has attacked the character of a prosecution witness or a deceased victim; and third, where he has given evidence against a co-defendant in the proceedings.It has long been acknowledged that the law in this area is highly unsatisfactory in its complexity and uncertainty. The Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1972, and the Runciman Royal Commission in 1973 recommended continuation of the scheme of general exclusion, but subject to slightly different exceptions, the latter also recommending that the Law Commission should consider it. In 1994 the Law Commission was asked to do so; it produced a consultation paper in 1996 prior to publishing its final report in 2001 mentioned above. Before this report the Government, in its policy paper "The Way Ahead", described the present law as a "haphazard collection of exclusionary rules" and mentioned as a possibility for "simplification" of the law, the admission of evidence of previous convictions where relevant, providing that their prejudicial effect does not outweigh their probative value. Ben Fitzpatrick in his article felt that "the assimilation into a single statute of the various principles developed by Parliament and the courts regarding the admissibility of previous misconduct should be welcomed, on the grounds of clarity and accessibility."In the Lord Justice Auld report Auld asserts his long held resistance to putting a defendant's previous convictions before a jury as part of the proof of guilt even under the present statutory regime. He said "It has always seemed to me that it is a poor prosecution case that needs to rely on a man's previous convictions in order to convict him. If the...

Find Another Essay On Law of Evidence

knowledge and evidence Essay

1624 words - 6 pages , or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.” In this example, we can see that the American justice system addresses the problem of subjective evidence. In fact, there are still many other similar rules, not just in the American law codes, but also in the Canadian, British and many other countless nations’ judicial systems that address the same problem of feeble objectivity within evidence

Common Law Civil Law Essay

665 words - 3 pages consideration of evidence. Incivil law system trials using the inquisitorial process, the role of thejudge is elevated.'(Vranken,M.1997). The judge assumes the role ofprincipals' interrogator of witnesses. Conversely, in the common lawsystem the role of the judge as the manager of the trial and lawyersacting in an adversary role, they are the prime players in theprocess.In the civil law system the judge merely applies the applicable codeprovisions

Pros and Cons of Sequestering Trial Juries

1382 words - 6 pages come only from the prosecution and defense. Such evidence is protected by the "Rules of Evidence" enforced by the judge. This case also presents special circumstances due to the "Rape Shield Law" a non-sequestered jury will be exposed to evidence not allowed by law at the trial that could prejudice their verdict. In a trial with the notoriety of the Bryant, trial sequestration also makes sure jurors are not pressured by the views of others they

Processing a Crime Scene

1211 words - 5 pages compromise if entered into evidence at trial. Works Cited Gaensslen, R. E., Harris, H A., & Lee, H. (2008). Introduction to Forensic Science and Criminalistics. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. . National Institute of Justice (2004, June). Crime Scene Investigation: A Reference for Law Enforcement Training. Retrieved June 3, 2011, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/200160.pdf Razzaq, N. Z. (2008). Visual

Does the Rape Shield law support Nesson's View that verdicts are to instill confidence in the public rather than maximizing the truth.

1297 words - 5 pages THE RAPE SHIELD LAWThe Rape Shield Law that limits the use of a victim's prior sexual history as an attempt to undermine the credibility of the victim's testimony supports Charles Nesson's view of verdicts. It supports Nesson's views in the sense that verdicts are not about the evidence but rather by the event. Furthermore the Rape Shield Law promotes public confidence in verdicts because the public especially rape victims, are encouraged to

Criminal Law Basics

1620 words - 6 pages of crime or the evidence of crime, a warrant can be issued allowing the search to be legal. When obtaining a warrant to search a property and detailed report of the area to be searched and the objects being sought has to be made. (Law for All, 2014) Exceptions to having a search and seizure warrant include: • Consent – officers are allowed to search without a warrant if a person agrees to the search. The authorizing person must be capable of

Computer Generated Evidence In Court

4785 words - 19 pages IntroductionWe are living in what is usually described as an 'information society' and as the business community makes ever greater use of computers the courts are going to find that increasingly the disputes before them turn on evidence which has at some stage passed through or been processed by a computer. In order to keep in step with this practice it is vital that the courts are able to take account of such evidence. As the Criminal Law

The Rule of Law is a doctrine that, when followed within a State, provides guarantees that all will be subject to the law, that the law will be enacte

2386 words - 10 pages can be reflected in a number of ways in the UK. One such way is the case of Jeffery Archer who was convicted on two counts of perjury and two counts of perverting the course of justice even though he was a minister. This can be evidence to the fact that even ministers can be convicted and that the law is not arbitrary and therefore the Rule of Law does guarantee that all will be subject to it. Another way that

Evidence Based Practice (EBP) in Juvenile Justice Systems

1164 words - 5 pages Evidence Based Practice emerged in the late 20th century, becoming widespread in the 21st century. According to Research and Practice: The Role of Evidence-Based Program Practices in the Youth Mentoring Field ( 2009) “The concept of Evidence Based Practice (EBP) actually has its roots in the medical field, where the work of Archie Cochrane (1972) and others examined the key role that the substantial body of medical research and literature could

"Throughout web of English criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen, that is a duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt". Woolmington v. DPP (1935) Viscount Shanley.

1616 words - 6 pages implict in the requirement of Art. 38.1 that 'no person shall be tried on any criminal charge save in due course of law'.In the Europenion Convention on Human Rights: 'everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law'#As Ireland and England are parties to the ECHR# the Act 6(2) is relating to it's law.Defendant is presumed innocent until a jury reaches a guilty verdict based on the evidence

Law. An Overview

903 words - 4 pages of integrity. Either have acommitment to comply with morality or completely abstain from ahypocritical form of servicing the law with words and no conformity.Consistency, is an extremely important factor of a system of law.Moynihan argues that the United State has begun to traverse apath leading away from its adherence to international law. 'There isclear evidence that the United States is moving away from its longestablished concern for and

Similar Essays

Evidence L Aw Assignment Paper

1011 words - 5 pages DPP Ex p. Kebilene [2000] 2 A.C. 326. R. v DPP Ex p. Kebilene [2000] 2 A.C. 326 at 381. Johnstone [2003] UKHL 28 ; [2003] 2 Cr. App.R. 493. Dyson LJ, 'Some Thoughts on Judicial Deference' [2006] 103, 103 Ibid. Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman [2001] UKHL 47 [2003] 1 AC 153 at [62] International Transport Roth GmbH v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] 1 C.M.L.R. 52. I Dennis, The Law of Evidence (4th, Sweet & Maxwell, 2010) 475 I Dennis, The Law of Evidence (4th, Sweet & Maxwell, 2010) 476 Lambert [2001] UKHL 37; [2002] 2 A.C. 545

Categories And Types Of Evidence And Their Use In The Courtroom

1551 words - 6 pages , parties and juries give out then closely inspect the different forms of proof ata court trial is all governed by the law of evidence. In a way, evidence forms an extension ofcriminal procedure. It also forms an extension of civil law. In the Unites States, the FederalRules of Evidence (FRE) are the rules the federal courts follow. Most of the laws of evidence areencompassed in the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Federal Rules of Evidence has played

Understanding Relevance Legal Standard Essay

985 words - 4 pages Petitioners claim the procedure was violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (Spencer v. Texas, 1967). One have to ask does the rule for inclusion or exclusion of the majority evidence depends on the wording of the rule? When viewing case law it recognized that some circumstances exclaim for the exclusion of evidence, which is without doubt. The wording of the rules can present a complexity in the process of including or

The Adversarial System Essay

2280 words - 9 pages -Monas states that in a system based on the rule of law and which aspires to ‘truth’, the accuracy and reliability of such information is essential. The mechanisms available to the court to determine the latter, centre on the presentation of evidence under oath, cross-examination and the observation of witness demeanour . The development of specific rules of evidence from the 18th. century onwards were much influenced by the jury system of trial