The experience we went through at Mount St. Joseph could be said to act as the pinnacle of the theory we studied during the lectures. Actually leading counseling groups requires of you an emulation of the theory and a reflexive attitude. I shall start this essay by providing a detailed description of my experience in leading a group. I shall follow by outlining the group dynamics present at the time. Following would be a detailed hypothesis to why I chose the particular leadership style. Lastly, I shall conclude with a brief summary of the major points.
During the experience as leaders, I and Tiziana decided to lead a group of 11 year old girls who were having difficulty adjusting to the new school. I experienced the group as being quite high in energy, especially when conflict was undergoing between two group members. The attention of the group tended to be quite one sided towards conflict and there were a couple of members who were rarely speaking. It was interesting that I was getting the feeling that the group was effective in reenacting the primary family group (Debattista, 2011). I was getting the feeling that at some point during the conflict there was an attempt to split us as co-leaders and also an ongoing striving by two members for attention.
The high conflict level and the high level of resistance in the group could be a factor which shows that the group is at the Transition stage (Krieg, as cited in Higgs, 1992). Resistance in the group could be said to be rampant. Laughing moments between the members, the conflict between a number of members and a thick silence in the other half of the group which was not fighting are examples of this resistance.
Although we as co-leaders strived to make it plausible that the group was in this stage of development, it could be observed that the initial stage was not enacted in the group, because there was a complete lack of rules and structure that could be built during the initial stage (Corey, 2008). Of course we as leaders did very little to bring structure to the group, because we were caught of guard to the direction that the group took, we really were not expecting that much conflict. Also it is very relevant to say that the group itself was reflecting the leaders themselves (Corey, 2008). The group was split in two; a high-energy clique that could be associated with Tiziana who was taking the reigns of the group and the observant, quite clique who could be associated with me who took a laid back attitude.
Furthermore one can say that this behaviour can be generalized to my leadership style. I took an observant style in the group and it complemented well with the fact that Tiziana took a much more proactive style. I must admit that if I were leading a group alone an observant style is not affective. Moreover Tiziana was getting strained by the whole group on her shoulders and during the middle grounds I started leading much more. This is where my active listening (Corey, 2008) to what...