Legal Rights During A Trial Essay

993 words - 4 pages

What are my rights if I have to go to trial for a crime that I have been accused of committing? The accused have several legal rights during a trial. The purpose of these rights is to make sure that the accused receive a fair trial. A defendant’s legal rights during a trial include the following: the right to confront a witness, right to compulsory process, the right to counsel and the right to an impartial jury. The one aspect that these rights have in common is outlined in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
According to authors Siegel and Worrall (2013), the right to confront a witness, is in alignment with the Sixth Amendment (p. 388). Defendants have the right to confront anyone that’s accusing them of any illegal or inappropriate behaviors that are a menace in a community. This applies to all defendants in both federal and state courts. Not only does the defendant have the right to confront a witness, put they are also allowed to be active participants in their trial. There is a confrontation clause that restricts and controls the level and mode of evidence. The overall purpose of this clause is to allow the defendant For instance, evidence given at preliminary hearing cannot be used if the witness is not present. However, if it can be proven that the defendant is responsible for the witness’ absence, than the prior testimony given could be used. A trial cannot be based on hearsay evidence. A consequence for not allowing a defendant to confront the witnesses is liable to cause a mistrial. The defendants’ rights have been violated and further action must be taken.
The right to compulsory process correlates to the right to confront a witness. This right is also in alignment with the Sixth Amendment. During this process, defendants have the right to subpoena witnesses to confront. A subpoena is an order to appear in court. Under this process a witness can not only be subpoenaed, but also a bench warrant can be issued. A bench warrant is a written command that gives a law enforcement agency permission to confiscate a witness and transport them to court. This is an indispensible component of the due process. According to the Missouri Bar (2006), both rights are used to assure that the defendant has a way to present favorable evidence (par. 11). All parties, except for the judges, can be required to support the defendant in locating witnesses.
According to the Sixth Amendment, the right to counsel is also an important right during a trial. The purpose of this right is to offer and allow the defendant to be represented. If the defendant cannot afford a lawyer, the government is required to appoint one. According to Reuters (2013), all accused suspects have the right to be counseled in every phase of the criminal process (par. 2). The counsels have many duties that they must perform. The defense counsel plays an advisory role by advising the defendant of available alternatives, which may include the plea bargain....

Find Another Essay On Legal Rights During a Trial

Competency to stand trial in United States Court Cases

1201 words - 5 pages During a criminal proceeding there are many aspects taken into consideration, in order to properly declare someone ‘competent’ to stand trial. Many would mistakenly interpret competency to stand trial as a psychological term, although it is in fact a legal definition. Legal competency consists of many components, which vary from: competency to confess, competency to waive Miranda rights, competency to make decisions over the medication imposed

Inaccurate View of the Legal System

1638 words - 7 pages Although often interpreted differently by individuals, legal rights, human rights and the jury system are essential features of the legal system. Nielsen believes that the main purpose of rights is to protect individuals, while Hajjar portrays the objective of the legal system as recognizing and respecting certain inherent human rights. Further, Dooley understands the jury system as essential for ensuring a democratic and fair trial

Describe what you understand by the terms ‘indemnity’ and ‘compensation’

1018 words - 5 pages case of rare clinical conditions, the compensation is considered as a tool to achieve target recruitment rate from a small number of diseased population. Indemnity and compensation in clinical trials In clinical trials, every effort has been made to protect the rights and well-being of the study participants. In many countries, clinical trial compensation and insurance policy are legal requirements. Indemnity provisions are made to cover the legal

Jury Trial Analysis

1143 words - 5 pages A jury trial is not to be confused with a bench trial as it often times is. While a bench trial takes places only in front of a Judge who is then tasked with coming to a verdict on his/her own, a jury trial is one that is “composed of members of the community present at the trial to act as the finder of fact” (McGuigan, 2014). The constitutional trial rights that are sanctioned throughout a jury trial is called a trial by jury. This is in the

Court Case Number 202: First Degree Murder

1330 words - 6 pages still unsatisfied and, therefore, appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court in 1965. Legal Proceedings: The first ten amendments in the United States Constitution are known as the Bill of Rights. Of these amendments, the fifth calls for due process during trial, outlaws double jeopardy and states that a person cannot be forced to testify as a witness against him or herself. A defendant is allowed to “plea the fifth” and stay silent

THE adversarial nature of the trial provides an effective means of getting to the truth of what happened?. Discuss.

2089 words - 9 pages the much as the justice system is today. Additionally, Hosteller (2008, p. 9) reports that treason and felony cases of those accused were not permitted to have legal council present to support them. He also goes on to state that during this period many trials were, trials by ordeal where by a person was likely to be kill or tortured in a brutal fashion such a trial by fire, water, or battle. However, these forms of the legal system would later be

Legal Process Paper

962 words - 4 pages Legal Process: Filing a Discrimination ComplaintThe Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a federal government agency that was created to enforce the compliance of federal employment discrimination laws (http://www.eeoc.gov). The federal laws implemented by the EEOC are the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Equal Pay Act of 1963, Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, Title I and V of the Americans with Disabilities

Rights of the Criminally Accused

885 words - 4 pages Everyone in the United States have specific rights when they are criminally accused. “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.” This quote was from Thomas Jefferson. Trial by jury goes along with everyone having rights when they are accused, it is one of the basic things in the bill of rights, that when you are accused, you have the right to

Identify and explain how technology was used in each of the following policing eras - Kaplan University, CJ216 - Essay

879 words - 4 pages . (Reuters, T. 2017) After the suspect has been booked, he will be held in custody until his arraignment. An arraignment is a formal reading of the defendant’s charges done by a criminal court judge, where the defendant will verify who he is, and will have a chance to plea "guilty", "not guilty", or "no contest". During this time the defendant can request legal counsel, either from a private attorney, or a public defender. The judge will then announce the

European Convention of Human Rights Analysis

2569 words - 10 pages , because of the existence of different legal systems it will be more difficult to set standards for a human rights guarantee for a fair trial. Article 6 does not allocate a specific content of these rights in the Contracting States legal systems. As Article 6 protects violations of abuses in criminal and civil procedures, a criminal charge must first be established. According to the leading case Engel v Netherlands “Criminal charge has an

special needs prisoner

1400 words - 6 pages TRIAL 1The Process of a Trial by Jury<Your Name><Your School><Course Title><Instructor's Name>January 20, 2013AbstractA trial by jury is a fundamental part of the United States Constitutional justice process. It both establishes and upholds the rights of the accused, and seeks to determine the truth in the matter of guilt or innocence. Ideally this is done both correctly and without bias, however this ideal state cannot

Similar Essays

Constitutional Rights During A State Of Emergency

2402 words - 10 pages Carolina (NC) annually. (Remer and Houston) So, all NC residents should be concerned with the issue of his or her constitutional rights, especially during a state of emergency. Individuals that do not have the means to be able to respond to mandatory martial law could face some serious consequences. Constitutionally, Americans are guaranteed certain individual rights that may not be infringed upon; on the contrary those rights may be violated to

Critical Analytical Argument Constitutional Rights During A State Of Emergency

999 words - 4 pages Background: The design structure of the United States (US) Government works at its peak during times of peace. (Dean) During such stints there is time for the review and debate with the common man’s best interest at the core. James Madison, clearly stated in the Bill of Rights, “The rights of the people to be secured in their persons, their houses, their papers, and their property from all unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated

Critical Analytical Argument Constitutional Rights During A State Of Emergency

806 words - 4 pages Background: The sheer design structure of the United States (US) Government works at its peak during times of peace. (Dean) During such times it works like a well-oiled machine, or so it seems. There is time for the review and debate with the common man’s best interest at the core. (Dean) Things like innocent until proven guilty, a fair trial, and being judged by a jury of unbiased peers. James Madison, clearly stated in The Bill of Rights, “The

This Is A Retorical Persuasive Speech I Had To Do On Cloning Should It Be Banned? Should Legal Rights Over Turn Moral Rights? Please Note, This Was Not Designed To Show A 'christian' Perspective

1139 words - 5 pages no, we can not blame it on God either.A lot of scientist who have been interviewed about human cloning all have one thing in common, they say that with human cloning you will have a perfect match for an organ donation in case you may at sometime in your life need one. Okay, but what about the rights of a clone? What if someone needs a heart transplant? They clone the person and keep the clone in confinement until the heart is ready? Then they