Leibniz: Animals And Man Essay

1316 words - 5 pages

G.W. Leibniz seems to suggest that humans are superior to all other creatures. Admittedly, Leibniz’s exact ideas on this matter are somewhat ambiguous, making it difficult to ascertain his position. In some instances, within the Discourse on Metaphysics, Leibniz appears to believe that animals do not have souls. On other occasions, however, he seems to express beliefs to the contrary. For example, Leibniz first expresses doubt on this when he questions “if they [animals] have any [souls]” (Leibniz 11). In another example, on the contrary, he asserts that “the souls … of other bodies are entirely different from intelligent souls” (12). Later, however, Leibniz definitively remarks “that animals have souls” (37). In The Monadology, it appears that Leibniz uncertainty about animal souls vanishes. Here, he first remarks that “nature has given heightened perceptions to animals, from the care she has taken to furnish them organs …” and then a few words later vows to explain “how what occurs in the soul represents what occurs in the organs” (71). What, I believe, Leibniz implies here is that animals have souls which are influenced and impacted by sensory perceptions. Then, in XXVI of The Monadology, he explains that “[m]emory provides a kind of sequence in souls, which imitates reason, but which must be distinguished from it” (71). Leibniz goes on to suggest in this section that animals have some form of memory or perception. In arguing as much, Leibniz gives the impression that since animals have memory, they have souls. Although Leibniz believes that they have souls, he, nonetheless, contends, in the Discourse on Metaphysics, that “all other creatures must serve” man (Leibniz, 12). He also claims, in addition, that “all wise persons value a man infinitely more than any other thing” (39).
Leibniz’s view neglects the inherent worth of all creatures and unjustifiably exalts mankind over other beings. In my interpretation of Leibniz, both animal and man have souls. To then suggest that God prefers the souls of man to the souls of other beings seems highly uncharacteristic of a God who “acts in the most perfect manner, not only metaphysically, but also morally speaking” (1). I will argue in the subsequent essay that humans and animals are equal; God, acting in a morally perfect manner, loves all creatures equally.
Leibniz develops both of his aforementioned beliefs on the basis that our “minds are made in” the image of God (40). Given that our minds are alike, Leibniz suggests that humans “alone can serve him [God] freely and act with knowledge in imitation of the divine nature” (39). Leibniz believes furthermore that God can communicate “his views and will in a particular manner” to humans; other creatures, reputed to be inferior to mankind due to their dissimilar mind, cannot enter into communication with nor understand God (39). Because of this, Leibniz then presumes that we humans “must be infinitely nearer to” God (39). It...

Find Another Essay On Leibniz: Animals and Man

Voltaire's Criticism of Leibniz Essay

4148 words - 17 pages of animals (which have simple reason, understanding, and memory) to human monads (which have a developed sense of reflection, self-consciousness, memory, and reason) to God, who is the ultimate monad.   The existence of God is central and crucial to the philosophy of Leibniz, and he gives at least four arguments for the existence of God. One that seems to best fit into the rest of his philosophy is his second argument for the existence of

Essay on Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz.

2087 words - 8 pages ) Leibniz maintained that the divine order of the universe is reflected in each of its parts, each part being called a monad, a term that means 'unit' or 'unity,' or a counterpart of an atom. Monads are incorporeal automata (a bodiless self moving thing) and are called by Leibniz "entelechies": "There is a world of created beings - living things, animals, entelechies and souls - in the least part of matter. Each portion of matter may be conceived as a

Discourse on Metaphysics by Leibniz

848 words - 3 pages actions as well as over all the rest of what happens in the world." With such a reality there would be no use for free will and whatever fate succumbs an individual is the will of the Most High; in other words, being destined. But for Leibniz, this is not the determined reality of humanity. Leibniz asserts, that it is God and only God, who has the insight of mans greatest reality. And man is unable to derive all of what he is, and is to become. For

Rationalism vs. Empiricism

1570 words - 6 pages philosophically. However, the dualist view separated human, animal and vegetative souls into a hierarchy, and so humans were still viewed as being beyond the realm of science. A similar idea to the hierarchy of souls was described by Leibniz (1714) in his Monadology, he described a hierarchy of existence, which placed God at the top of the hierarchy, followed by humans, animals, and microbes. Prior to this period in philosophy, to speak of man in this

Contributions of Isaac Newton

1251 words - 5 pages applied mathematician. Thus, Newton was able to discover and develop calculus and also apply it to scientific experiments. However, Newton was not the only one who developed calculus. Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, a German mathematician, also developed calculus at the same time as Newton. The difference between the two types of calculus is that Leibniz looked at variables as “ranging over sequences of infinitely close values” (“The History of

The Rationalism of Descartes and Leibniz

2257 words - 9 pages and matter. Man, then, partakes of the two relative substances of which all else in the universe is made. Man is of the universe, for Descartes. As part of nature, he is mechanical to the extreme; he is a machine which operates by natural laws just as a watch might operate. These determinist ideas were to have a long influence and were propagated along with a similar dualism in the philosophy of Leibniz. Leibniz was probably the supreme

The Problem of Evil

2030 words - 9 pages evidence to support his argument. Malebranche’s claim that evil is a bi-product of the laws God has set in place doesn’t seem plausible to me. So in conclusion, I find that Leibniz’s solution to the problem of evil to be more plausible and that this world is the best possible world that God could have created. Works Cited Leibniz, Gottfried. Essays on the Justice of God and the Freedom of Man in the Origins of Evil. Malebranche, Nicolas

Voltaire's Candide

3502 words - 14 pages his "enemy" Rousseau: "men, all misfortunes come from you". Candide is the story of a man whose naive soul is born in a world governed by evil and injustice. With experience as his only teacher, reason as his only hope, and action as the only and ultimate solution, this man has to find his place in a world that is made for nobody and in which happiness seems impossible to reach. "Reality is bad, but the denial of it is even worst". This is

Candide: A Critique

913 words - 4 pages Pope, in his Essay on Man, argues that every human being is a part of a greater, rational, grand design of God. Voltaire points out the absurdity of optimism through the use of irony, hyperbole, understatement, and especially flawed logic. Doctor Pangloss, a follower of Leibniz, attempts to use logic to explain the existence of evil, upholding such beliefs to the point of absurdity, justifying all events through cause-and-effect relationships

Idealism and Its Struggles to Exist

2185 words - 9 pages subjects such as science and philosophy to increase. Due to the increase of philosophy idealist such as Gottfreid Leibniz, John Locke, and George Berkeley were able to get people to listen to their ideas and try to follow their ideas through. If the revolution and the increase of learning none of the previously mentioned idealists would have been able to get their ideas across and no one would have tried to execute them. Idealists in History

Newton's Negative Neglect

1154 words - 5 pages time. Another issue Newton faced was false accusations. Newton had a dislike for publishing his works, until it seemed as if others were beginning to reveal the same things he did. For example, a man named Gottfried Leibniz began uncovering things in the field of calculus, a field Newton claimed to discover well before Leibniz had. Newton was then inclined to publish his work in calculus, just before Leibniz did, which led to major controversy

Similar Essays

Animals And Man Essay

1726 words - 7 pages memory, they also have souls. Although Leibniz believes that animals have souls, he, nonetheless, contends, in the Discourse on Metaphysics, that “all other creatures must serve” man (12). He also claims, in addition, that “all wise persons value a man infinitely more than any other thing” and assumes God is of the same opinion (39). I do not believe that other creatures are to serve man, nor can I agree that man has more value than other

Animal Farm By George Orwell. A Satire On The Russian Revolution Through The Eyes Of One Man And This Many Animals That Portray The Many Characters Of His Life And Or Situation

4287 words - 17 pages that Jones (Czar Nicholas II) was losing his "edge". In fact, he and his men had taken up the habit of drinking. Old Major reveals his feelings about Jones and his administration when he says, "Man is the only creature that consumes without producing. He does not give milk, he does not lay eggs, he is too weak to pull the plough, he cannot run fast enough to catch rabbits. Yet he is lord of all the animals. He sets them to work, he gives back to

Leibniz: The Father Of Modern Calculus

1549 words - 6 pages Virgil's 'Aeneid' by heart" (O'Connor and Robertson). He also wrote a book on history. After his thesis was rejected by the University of Leipzig, Leibniz pursued alchemy and magic at Nürnberg. To add to that, Leibniz made an attempt at becoming a diplomat. This ambitious man made several efforts to reunite the Protestant and Catholic Church. He also tried to persuade Louis XIV to attack Egypt instead of German areas. In the end, these

Critique On Gottfried Wilhelm Von Leibniz's Theories On The Mind

1291 words - 5 pages mind to tell it to eat, hunt, sleep, drink, and move. Without the ability to think, actions would be robotic, meaning there would be no need for a preference of food or drink consumption, because we would mindlessly be compelled to refuel –like a car. Instead, Leibniz takes the Occasionalist notion that thoughts are formed from a different substance, with the exception of animals who Leibniz believes can potentially have the ability of thought