This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Small Element, Big Difference: A Comparison Of Adam Smith And Karl Marx's View On Labor In A Capitalist Society.

1721 words - 7 pages

Adam Smith and Karl Marx are both considered few of the most influential giants in social and economical history. When viewing their economical standpoints, it is not difficult to recognize the difference in ideas that they have regarding society. Adam Smith is an advocator for capitalism and the wealth that can be accumulated in it, while Karl Marx critiques on the flaws of capitalism and praises communism that will overthrow the capitalist society. However, both of them base their theories on the characteristic of labor. Even though Marx and Smith both point to the significance of one's labor in a capitalist society, Smith views labor as having the potential, in conjunction with the division of labor, to stimulate the public wealth and encourage the growth of an ultimately unregulated opulent commercial society. Marx, while starting at a conceptually similar point, observes that in a capitalist system people cannot acquire the wealth produced by their labor due to the alienation between the laborer and his/her means of production. The result of this alienation is exponential division of wealth between the rich bourgeois and the deprived proletariat, leading to revolution in the capitalist economy.Although ownership of one's own labor is a key element in both Smith and Marx's theories, they have subtle dissimilarities, leading to substantial opposing conclusions about a capitalist society. In a capitalist society, while Smith views labor as the most sanctified property in the laborers disposal to achieve the goals of self-interest, Marx states that with two classes in society, labor is not truly "free" to use since the laborer is forced to work for the capitalist owner in order to survive. This is because of the alienation between the laborer and his means of production. As Marx states, " If the product of work is externalization, production itself must be active externalization" If the worker is alienated from the product, then the worker is alienated from production itself. According to Smith, one's property is determined by his/her labor. He states that, "the property which every man has in his own labor, the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. To hinder a poor man from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property," clearing indicating that one should use his/her labor to act towards his/her self-betterment. He also makes it clear that depriving the use of this labor is clearly an intolerable violation of property. Even though Marx agrees with Smith by stating "labour-power can appear on the market as a commodity only if, and in so far as, it's possessor, the individual whose labour power it is, offers it for sell or sells it as a commodity," he believes that for the proletariat, the freedom of using their labor-power is deprived. When an individual sells his/her labor as a commodity to...

Find Another Essay On Small Element, Big Difference: A comparison of Adam Smith and Karl Marx's view on labor in a capitalist society.

Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marx

562 words - 2 pages Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marx Smith and Marx agree upon the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers. Capitalism is born out of the division of labour... that is, it is made possible by dividing jobs up into simple tasks as a way of increasing efficiency. By increasing efficiency, then everyone can produce more than they personally need. The extra produced can go towards the accumulation of capital, (machines, more land

Political economy is basically a debate between Adam Smith and Karl Marx - International Relations - Essay

3468 words - 14 pages UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM School of Government and Society Student ID No: 1812749 Programme of study: Political Science and International Relations Module title: Understanding Politics Module banner code: POLS 101 Word Count* 2,352 Module leader: Dr. Peter Burnham Seminar Teacher Mattias Hjort Submission date: 4 December 2017 Assignment title: “Political economy is essentially a debate between Adam Smith and Karl Marx”. Discuss. Extension: no

Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx

955 words - 4 pages Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx, living in the typical capitalist community in the United States, it is much easier to relate to the thoughts of Adam Smith. This is not to say that I do not agree with some of the precepts of pure Communism, but like the old adage says, Communism looks good on the outside.Adam Smith states his opinion on the mercantile system and its faults, while he dissected, clarified, and revolutionized the mercantilist economy and

Adam Smith v. Karl Marx

2229 words - 9 pages Opinions About a Common Goal” Adam Smith and Karl Marx use similar methods to convey contrasting views of economics, which they believe to be the controlling factor for all political and social aspects in society. Their work was separated in time by almost a century and in general philosophy by a great difference in the way that each viewed the human condition. Although history may have shown Smith to be right, the seriousness of the argument that

Karl Marx's Contribution to Labor Theory of Value

1263 words - 5 pages , it is noteworthy that Aristotle makes a distinction between use value and exchange value. Larger strides in LTV were made in the 18th century, when Marx would argue that “equality of labor” started to become actualized. This is when Adam Smith, the father of modern capitalism, and David Ricardo, a staple in Classical Economics, further developed the LTV. Adam Smith mentioned the LTV when he analyzed the economic systems of primitive

Adam Smith "Wealth of Nations" The benefit of division of labor to society

694 words - 3 pages Adam Smith is often accused of propounding an economictheory based solely on self-interest and individual welfare,however Smith's own writings indicate that this is not thecase. Smith sees that his ideas surrounding the division oflabor will not only benefit the individuals in control ofproduction, but society as a whole. In Book Three of TheWealth of Nations Smith writes:"The gains of both are mutual and reciprocal,and the division of labor is

Karl Marx's Views on how Industrialization Affected Society

1707 words - 7 pages Karl Marx's Views on how Industrialization Affected Society The Industrial Revolution was the result of many interrelated changes that transformed society from agricultural communities into industrial ones. The most immediate changes on society because of this revolution were on the products that were produced, where, and how. Goods that were traditionally made in homes or small workshops began to be manufactured in large

Ideal Ideal: Comparison, Contrast, and Synthesis of Marxist Socialism and Adam Smith's Capitalist ideals

1801 words - 7 pages position of workers in a post-industrialization capitalist society. Each of these works contain opinions so popular among their followers that the opinions hypothesized with them have sparked interest, thought, debate, revolution, and even war. Adam Smith's praise of the division of labor during the industrial revolution find it's antithesis in The Communist Manifesto, but a synthesis of efficiency and equity could lead to a more just society for

Comparative: Smith and Marx's to Kierkegaard and Dostoevsky's view of god and religion

633 words - 3 pages , along with society's, and obtain salvation through an absolute devotion to faith. However, the works of Smith, Marx, Kierkegaard, and Dostoevsky prove that argument to be ridiculous. There is no "in between" stance; only one or the other.Though Smith and Marx differ greatly in their socioeconomic theories, they are similar in the fact that they are both concerned with our economic society. The two revolutionaries recognize the impact society has on

"Are Marx's views on social class applicable to late 20th century capitalist society?"

1488 words - 6 pages Not a lot has changed since Marx first started expressing his ideas on social class over 150 years ago. Writing during the emergence of Industrial Capitalism, Marx foresaw such concepts as globalisation, multinationalism and privatisation - tools of Capitalist society employed to ensure that the balance of money and power leans heavily towards the Capitalist class, or Bourgeoisie. These concepts have created a world in which economics is far

Economis Theorists- Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes and their contributions to the field of economics

597 words - 2 pages the Father of the Mixed Economy, and is known for Keynesian Economics. Each of them has had a great impact on economic theories of today.Adam Smith, who lived in the 18th century, is known as the Father of Economics. Prior to him, economics wasn't a big issue; either politics or philosophy was studied. No one really explored the issue of economics. Smith then wrote The Wealth of Nations and it was the start of an economic revolution. The book had

Similar Essays

A Comparison Of The Economic Philosophies Of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, And Karl Marx

1811 words - 7 pages As far back as man has been on earth, he has been driven towards building a community among his peers. Whether that is a community of hunters and gatherers who share whatever the day has brought to them within their tribe, or a larger community which within its structure lie the inner dwellings of division of labor and societal classes. Adam Smith (18th Century), John Stuart Mill (19th Century), and Karl Marx (19th Century) are of the same

A Comparison Of The Economic Theories Of Adam Smith And Karl Marx

2467 words - 10 pages There is perhaps not a more famous ongoing dialectic argument in the field of political economy than the one between Adam Smith and Karl Marx in regards to capitalism. The two thinkers, although coming to radically different conclusions about the outcomes of the capitalist system for all parties involved, agree on a surprising number of ideas such as labor being the source of commodities’ value, as well as the fact that the division of labor

Introduction To Philosophy: This Essay Is About My Philosophy Of Human Nature And A Comparison And Contrast With Karl Marx's View Of Human Nature. Essay Includes Resources

1650 words - 7 pages Philosophy of Human NatureMy philosophy of human nature is based on the existence of God. To get a more in depth view of my philosophy, I will explain in detail that I have a theistic view much like the philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas. I was raised in a deeply religious catholic family, who frequented church on a regular basis. This upbringing in the catholic setting has deeply impacted my view of human nature and the existence of God and how he

Viewpoints Of Durkhiem, Karl Marx, And Adam Smith

790 words - 4 pages diversity and division of labor is much less, so individuals share similar views of life and so do not bring different thoughts into society. However nations in organic view points have more diverse occupations therefore people rely on each other more, which results in greater benefits to the society. KARL MARX: Marx viewed the increase in specialization leads workers to be less enthusiastic for their work and leads them to have poor overall skills