Louis Riel Should Not Have Been Hung: Agree Or Disagree?

624 words - 2 pages

Justice is fairness. Justice is equality. Justice is necessary. In today's society, justice isn't always served. Over a hundred years ago, justice wasn't always served. Louis Riel was just one of the many back in the days of John A Macdonald who was discriminated against and treated without respect. He was a Canadian politician, a devoted Métis leader, and most of all, a martyr for his people. Throughout his 41 year life, from 1844 - 1885, he brought Manitoba into Confederation with Canada. During these times, there were many conflicts with the government of Canada. Even at those times, Riel stood his ground and never consented to violence. He was a peaceful spiritual leader and was a role model for his people. Even then, the people of English-speaking Canada treated him without justice. He was falsely accused of murder and high treason, which lead to his death by the gallows. For these reasons, Louis Riel should not have been hung.Manitoba is part of Canada today because of one man's efforts ... and for that reason, Riel should not have been hung. In the late 1860s, many problems arose from the Red River settlement. The Canadian government ignored the Métis in their requests and petitions for education and proper medication in Manitoba. In response, the Métis captured Fort Garry, creating a huge uproar in English speaking Canada. The people of Red River meant to be heard. Under the superb negotiating skills and determination of Riel, the government of Canada and the Red River Settlement came to an agreement on July 15, 1870. Even today, Louis Riel is known as the 'Father of Manitoba' for his unwavering efforts to make his people heard.Though many have accused Riel of being a troublemaker and a murderer, he was actually a peaceful spiritual leader. He was completely devoted to his people...

Find Another Essay On Louis Riel Should not have been Hung: Agree or Disagree?

"Do you think there are any authors or books not listed in the `Chicago Canon` that should definitely not have been omitted? Discuss" Socrates

562 words - 2 pages principles even though they ultimately cost him his life.To my surprise Socrates was not mentioned on the `Chicago Canon` list, while he definitely should not have been omitted, for he was the most mysterious figure in all history of philosophy. Despite having written nothing, Socrates (470 – 399 BC), is considered to be one of the most influential thinkers in Europe. He is customarily regarded as the father of political philosophy and ethics

Agree or Disagree: "President Truman did not take effective action to prevent the spread of Communist influence following World War II."

2328 words - 9 pages After World War II, the Soviet Union emerged as a great Communist Power with wide influences and many people blamed Truman for not taking effective action to prevent the fall of China and Korea to the Communist control. After failed results from appeasing the Soviets, it was understood that communism would expand relentlessly whether Russia was communist or tsarist. Thus Truman formed many alliances and gave aid to the non-communist countries to

Auschwitz: Should It Have Been Bombed?

822 words - 4 pages interpreters did not have the necessary experience in analyzing concentration or labor camps. Photo interpreters were instead specialized in analyzing industrial sites (Downing). On top of all this was the vast number of photographs the Allies had to handle; the average photograph intake per day at the Allied Central Interpretation Unit was 85,000 (Rubinstein, 168). All this means is that it is highly unlikely the photo interpreters would have been

Auschwitz: Should It Have Been Bombed?

2059 words - 8 pages Many debates still arise surrounding the Holocaust. One such debate is whether the Allies could have and should have carried out a bombing on Auschwitz. During WWII, the leaders of the Allied forces were confronted with the decision of whether to bomb the crematoriums at Auschwitz II (Auschwitz-Birkenau). These crematorium were the biggest complex of mass murder the Nazis used during the Holocaust. The decision not to bomb Auschwitz was a hard

Auschwitz: Should It Have Been Bombed?

1166 words - 5 pages Many debates still arise surrounding the Holocaust. One such debate is whether the Allies could have and should have carried out a bombing on Auschwitz. During WWII, the leaders of the allied forces were confronted with the decision of whether to bomb the crematoriums at Auschwitz II (Auschwitz-Birkenau). These crematorium were the biggest complex of mass murder the Nazis used during the Holocaust. The decision not to bomb Auschwitz

Should Augustus Have Been the First Emperor?

787 words - 4 pages set to rule Rome after Caesar, but none of the factors should have led to Antony killing himself. Mark Antony was first became acquaintances with Caesar around 51 B.C. Antony was appointed as one of Caesar’s officers. While Antony was getting close to Caesar, Caesar and Pompey were fighting over who could have complete rule of Rome. Antony was good with his words, and helped with his “benefactor, Caesar, who was being challenged by the Roman

Do You Agree ỏ Disagree With The Follow Statement? Boys And Girls Should Attend Separate Schools

2150 words - 9 pages TASK 2: ARGUMENT ESSAYS - 3 MODELSIn the column next to each paragraph in the 3 essays below, write( if it is neutral (agrees and disagrees - is balanced)( if it agrees with the topic (NOT if you agree)( if it disagrees with the topic (NOT if you disagree).Single-Sex or Co-Ed Schools: Boys and girls SHOULD be educated together. In the UAE, most schools are single-sex. Some people believe that this kind of school offers more benefits for the

Schools Should Not Have Uniforms

1314 words - 5 pages Would anybody want their freedom taken from them? Nobody would willingly give their freedom up. What’s the next thing thats going to happen, will schools having edible food. Hard to see, right? So are uniforms. Schools should not have uniforms for these three reasons: It takes the students freedom of expression away, it’s a bandaid reason to cover up violence, and some parents might not be able to afford the uniforms. It takes freedom of

Australians Never Should Have Been Sent To Fight In Vietnam Because It Just Was Not Our Fight

855 words - 4 pages in the Vietnamese War. So that we could stem the flow of communism around the Asian region that was apparently spreading. Troops went and died for his decision, but still, communism remained. Australians should never have been sent to fight in Viename because it was not our fight. The many protest groups around at the time tried the Government this, but still the government pressed on.Vietnam used to be occupied by the french in the eighteenth

“Monopoly Power Exploits Consumers And Misallocates Resources. Therefore, Natural Monopoly Industries Should Not Have Been Privatised.” Discuss

1722 words - 7 pages efficiency was perfectly capable of happening under government ruling if they wanted to. There is also the line of reasoning that many of the loss-making firms were once profitable as nationalised firms, so they should not have risked privatisation.Now taking the case of the railway network, now run by Railtrack I will state some of the opinions agreeing with the statement in the question that is of the opinion that this industry should never have been

The Title is Antisemitism and the Dreyfus Affair. It answers the question of whether or not Cpt. Dreyfus would have been arrested if he was not a jew. The essay states that he would not have been

2269 words - 9 pages increase in nationalism, an unprecedented love of, and interest in, the Army, and an anti-Semitic revival. If Dreyfus had not been a Jew in the army, the Affair would have been no more than a minor controversy, as many cases after him were. He also might not have been convicted. Anti-Semitism along with chance was the main reason Dreyfus was arrested.Alfred Dreyfus was born in Mulhouse, on October 9, 1859 to a family of Alsatian Jews. As a result of the

Similar Essays

The University Should Not Provide So Much Theoretical Knowledge But Give Students More Practical Training. Do You Agree Or Disagree?

402 words - 2 pages For a long time, there has been arguments about whether university should or should not provide students with practical training while teaching theoreticalknowledge. As to this matter I hold the opinion that it's university's function to provide students theoretical knowledge, but not necessarily it's duty to give them practical training.It is generally considered that university is an institution which concentrate on mainly two tasks: one is

Do You Agree Or Disagree With The Following Statement? “Boys And Girls Should Attend Different Schools”.

690 words - 3 pages to school means much more than just gaining a better understanding of biology or physics or how to do math to a child or teenager. School time overlaps some of the most important stages of every person’s life, for example, puberty and maturation, which is the bridge between childhood and adolescence. First reason I think boys and girls should attend separate schools is the maturation gap between genders. Boys and girls do not reach puberty

The Atomic Bomb Should Not Have Been Dropped

709 words - 3 pages Eric Gallager4/11/10The Atomic Bomb Should Not Have Been DroppedAs President Obama signs new nuclear policy, we are reminded of the longand sordid history of nuclear policy in the United States. We have come a long waysince we decided to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II.It is amazing that we continue debating this initial deployment of nuclear weaponrytoday. The US should not have decided to drop these atomic bombs

Should The American Colonists Have Been Patriots Or Loyalists?

1083 words - 4 pages North America had to make a choice: to become a Patriot, opposing British rule, or a Loyalist, supporting British rule. Patriots protested the fair taxes and policies imposed on them, boycotting goods and committing violence. They used propaganda to feed the public false information. On the other hand, Loyalists felt that they should have been loyal to the mother country and King George III. Consequently, colonial radicals tarred and feathered